[#6660] Ruby on Neko ? — Nicolas Cannasse <ncannasse@...>

Hi folks,

14 messages 2005/11/19

[#6672] testing for hardlink with "test(?-, ...)" flawed on Windows — noreply@...

Bugs item #2858, was opened at 2005-11-20 16:35

13 messages 2005/11/20

[#6684] semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...>

Hi all,

81 messages 2005/11/21
[#6685] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Mauricio Fern疣dez <mfp@...> 2005/11/22

On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:22:59AM +0900, Stefan Kaes wrote:

[#6686] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:

[#6687] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/11/22

On Nov 21, 2005, at 4:37 PM, Stefan Kaes wrote:

[#6689] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

Eric Hodel wrote:

[#6693] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/11/22

Hi,

[#6695] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#6718] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — mathew <meta@...> 2005/11/22

[#6722] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

mathew wrote:

[#6707] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/11/22

Hi --

[#6708] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

David A. Black wrote:

[#6714] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/11/22

Hi --

[#6717] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

David A. Black wrote:

[#6798] ruby 1.8.4 preview2 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hi,

37 messages 2005/11/30

Re: 1.8.4 p1, warning roundup

From: Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
Date: 2005-11-02 17:13:43 UTC
List: ruby-core #6551
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Daniel Berger wrote:

> Hugh Sasse wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Daniel Berger wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > Solaris 10
> > > gcc 3.4.4
> > > 
> > > Here's the latest round of warnings from 1.8.4 p1, excluding the
> > > "suggested
> > > parantheses" and "type punned pointer" warnings:
> > > 
> > > # Make warnings
> > > make: Warning: Illegal dependency list for target `.DEFAULT'
> > 
> > 
> > Which make are you using?  (Sun, GNU, ...)
> 
> Sun.

GNU make may cope better
> 
> > which ld?
> 
> Sun.
> 
> djberge@~-866>ld -V
> ld: Software Generation Utilities - Solaris Link Editors: 5.10-1.479

I don't know how gnu ld will compare...
> 
> > > # More on the make warning, from the make man page:
> > > .DEFAULT:               If it has an entry in the  makefile,
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > Do you have a script to collect, and collate, this information?
> 
> No.  I'm not sure what you mean.

I assumed you'd done the build in a shell or ruby script and grepped
for the warnings, sorted them by type.  It would save me having to
write one to reproduce your results.  For if the maintainers are to
compare between platforms it would be useful to be able to diff
them.  I'll probably try to throw something together to do this but
will probably be beaten to it.
        [...]
> Regards,
> 
> Dan
> 
        Thank you
        Hugh
> 
> 


In This Thread