[#6864] ruby 1.8.4 rc breaks alias_method/rails in bad ways — "Ara.T.Howard" <ara.t.howard@...>

20 messages 2005/12/09
[#6870] Re: ruby 1.8.4 rc breaks alias_method/rails in bad ways — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Florian_Gro=DF?= <florgro@...> 2005/12/12

Ara.T.Howard wrote:

[#6872] Re: ruby 1.8.4 rc breaks alias_method/rails in bad ways — ara.t.howard@... 2005/12/12

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, [ISO-8859-15] Florian Growrote:

[#6873] Re: ruby 1.8.4 rc breaks alias_method/rails in bad ways — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2005/12/12

On Dec 12, 2005, at 1:19 PM, ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:

[#6874] Re: ruby 1.8.4 rc breaks alias_method/rails in bad ways — ara.t.howard@... 2005/12/12

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#6891] Time.utc! and Time.localtime! — Daniel Hobe <hobe@...>

Writing a script yesterday I found out, much to my surprise, that the

16 messages 2005/12/14

[#6918] change to yaml in 1.8.4 — ara.t.howard@...

14 messages 2005/12/16

[#6934] 1.8.x, YAML, and release management — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

I'm concerned that 1.8.3's acceptance of non-backwards-compatible

28 messages 2005/12/18

[#6996] Problems building 1.8.4 with VS8 C++ Express Edition (cl 14.00) — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>

Visual Studio C++ 2005 Express Edition (VS 8.0)

20 messages 2005/12/27

Re: ruby 1.8.4 preview2

From: nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...>
Date: 2005-12-02 02:12:47 UTC
List: ruby-core #6818
Hi,

At Fri, 2 Dec 2005 10:48:01 +0900,
U.Nakamura wrote in [ruby-core:06817]:
> | I don't think so.  Just re-packaging with Bison 1.x, 2.0 or
> | modified 2.1.
> 
> I agree that ruby distribution should be re-packaged with
> another version of Bison.

Or:

  $ bison-2.1 -o parse.c parse.y && sed -i '/^    ;$/d' parse.c

> Of course this aproach doesn't help another non-ansi compilers.
> But telling Bison that VC and BCC are ansi compilers is not
> bad thing, I think.

#ifdef HAVE_PROTOTYPES

-- 
Nobu Nakada

In This Thread