[#6660] Ruby on Neko ? — Nicolas Cannasse <ncannasse@...>

Hi folks,

14 messages 2005/11/19

[#6672] testing for hardlink with "test(?-, ...)" flawed on Windows — noreply@...

Bugs item #2858, was opened at 2005-11-20 16:35

13 messages 2005/11/20

[#6684] semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...>

Hi all,

81 messages 2005/11/21
[#6685] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Mauricio Fern疣dez <mfp@...> 2005/11/22

On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:22:59AM +0900, Stefan Kaes wrote:

[#6686] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:

[#6687] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/11/22

On Nov 21, 2005, at 4:37 PM, Stefan Kaes wrote:

[#6689] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

Eric Hodel wrote:

[#6693] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/11/22

Hi,

[#6695] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#6718] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — mathew <meta@...> 2005/11/22

[#6722] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

mathew wrote:

[#6707] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/11/22

Hi --

[#6708] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

David A. Black wrote:

[#6714] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/11/22

Hi --

[#6717] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

David A. Black wrote:

[#6798] ruby 1.8.4 preview2 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hi,

37 messages 2005/11/30

Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers

From: Stefan Kaes <skaes@...>
Date: 2005-11-22 14:46:58 UTC
List: ruby-core #6710
Ara.T.Howard wrote:

> On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Stefan Kaes wrote:
>
>> URABE Shyouhei wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 22 Nov 2005, at 15:57, Stefan Kaes wrote:
>>>
>>>> This doesn't solve the problem of accessing the hash twice and 
>>>> computing the hash of the lookup key twice. And it's even more text 
>>>> than before.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> f(options.fetch(:x){raise}) rescue nil
>>>
>>> Don't know if it's elegant though
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Neither elegant nor efficient. And don't ask me whether it's 
>> intuitive or understandable.
>
>
> i use this
>
>   harp:~ > cat a.rb
>   options = {:x => 42}
>   alias f puts
>
>   x = options[:x] and f x
>
>   harp:~ > ruby a.rb
>   42
>
> -a

I'm afraid I don't understand what you're driving at, although I have 
read the Hitchhiker's guide.

Maybe there's some fine irony hidden here, but I just don't get it.

Sorry.

-- stefan


In This Thread