[#6660] Ruby on Neko ? — Nicolas Cannasse <ncannasse@...>

Hi folks,

14 messages 2005/11/19

[#6672] testing for hardlink with "test(?-, ...)" flawed on Windows — noreply@...

Bugs item #2858, was opened at 2005-11-20 16:35

13 messages 2005/11/20

[#6684] semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...>

Hi all,

81 messages 2005/11/21
[#6685] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Mauricio Fern疣dez <mfp@...> 2005/11/22

On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:22:59AM +0900, Stefan Kaes wrote:

[#6686] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:

[#6687] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/11/22

On Nov 21, 2005, at 4:37 PM, Stefan Kaes wrote:

[#6689] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

Eric Hodel wrote:

[#6693] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/11/22

Hi,

[#6695] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#6718] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — mathew <meta@...> 2005/11/22

[#6722] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

mathew wrote:

[#6707] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/11/22

Hi --

[#6708] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

David A. Black wrote:

[#6714] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/11/22

Hi --

[#6717] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

David A. Black wrote:

[#6798] ruby 1.8.4 preview2 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hi,

37 messages 2005/11/30

Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2005-11-22 15:08:04 UTC
List: ruby-core #6712
Hi,

In message "Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers"
    on Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:10:32 +0900, Stefan Kaes <skaes@gmx.net> writes:

|I perfectly understand your argument. Anyone writing code like this
|
|x = (
|       line1;
|       line2;
<snip>
|       line29;
|       line30) if expr
|
|should be shot ;-) although it's legal syntax.
|
|Fact is, noone writes it that way.

Because you shoot all who write in that way. ;-)

The current syntax rule is:

  if assignment is done, a right hand side identifier is a local
  variable thereafter.

And your proposed rule is:

  if assignment is done, a right hand side identifier is a local
  variable thereafter.  and assignment in modifier condition affects
  modifying statement as well.

Despite your first impression, it's complex and confusing rule.
Besides that it doesn't help cases like:

  while true
    a
    a = 1
  end

Only alternative reasonable rule I can think of is:

  if there is assignment, a right hand side identifier is a local
  variable in the current scope.

But it's rather drastic change.  I'm not sure if it's a good rule,
or worth the change.

							matz.

In This Thread