[#6660] Ruby on Neko ? — Nicolas Cannasse <ncannasse@...>

Hi folks,

14 messages 2005/11/19

[#6672] testing for hardlink with "test(?-, ...)" flawed on Windows — noreply@...

Bugs item #2858, was opened at 2005-11-20 16:35

13 messages 2005/11/20

[#6684] semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...>

Hi all,

81 messages 2005/11/21
[#6685] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Mauricio Fern疣dez <mfp@...> 2005/11/22

On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:22:59AM +0900, Stefan Kaes wrote:

[#6686] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:

[#6687] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/11/22

On Nov 21, 2005, at 4:37 PM, Stefan Kaes wrote:

[#6689] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

Eric Hodel wrote:

[#6693] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/11/22

Hi,

[#6695] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#6718] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — mathew <meta@...> 2005/11/22

[#6722] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

mathew wrote:

[#6707] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/11/22

Hi --

[#6708] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

David A. Black wrote:

[#6714] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/11/22

Hi --

[#6717] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

David A. Black wrote:

[#6798] ruby 1.8.4 preview2 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hi,

37 messages 2005/11/30

Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers

From: "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Date: 2005-11-23 14:21:26 UTC
List: ruby-core #6757
Hi --

On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Sean E. Russell wrote:

> On Tuesday 22 November 2005 12:31, Steven Jenkins wrote:
>> It's also valid English, but not what people would typcially say. If the
>> auxiliary phrase needs rhetorical emphasis, however, putting it first
>> makes sense:
>
> 	I'm going to the concert, if I can get the money.
>
> 	I'm going to be a doctor, unless I flunk out of college.
>
> Statements like these are not only valid, but common.  Furthermore,
>
> 	Hammer on that nail until it is flush
>
> It is much less common to hear people construct that sentence as:
>
> 	Until it is flush, hammer on that nail.

Until ready, vamp.  Until golden brown, bake.  'Til you drop, shop.

They're just not the same that way, are they? :-)

> I *like* constructions as:
>
> 	begin
> 		do_something
> 	end until foo
>
> although I'd prefer:
>
> 	loop
> 		...
> 	until foo
>
> What's really interesting is that we're debating the syntax of Ruby WRT
> sentence structures in English and German, when the language author is a
> native speaker of neither.

And Ruby *is* neither :-)  I guess it's a bit of a permathread.


David

-- 
David A. Black
dblack@wobblini.net

In This Thread