[#6660] Ruby on Neko ? — Nicolas Cannasse <ncannasse@...>

Hi folks,

14 messages 2005/11/19

[#6672] testing for hardlink with "test(?-, ...)" flawed on Windows — noreply@...

Bugs item #2858, was opened at 2005-11-20 16:35

13 messages 2005/11/20

[#6684] semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...>

Hi all,

81 messages 2005/11/21
[#6685] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Mauricio Fern疣dez <mfp@...> 2005/11/22

On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:22:59AM +0900, Stefan Kaes wrote:

[#6686] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:

[#6687] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/11/22

On Nov 21, 2005, at 4:37 PM, Stefan Kaes wrote:

[#6689] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

Eric Hodel wrote:

[#6693] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/11/22

Hi,

[#6695] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#6718] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — mathew <meta@...> 2005/11/22

[#6722] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

mathew wrote:

[#6707] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/11/22

Hi --

[#6708] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

David A. Black wrote:

[#6714] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/11/22

Hi --

[#6717] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

David A. Black wrote:

[#6798] ruby 1.8.4 preview2 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hi,

37 messages 2005/11/30

Re: Wildness: Purpose of NOEX_PUBLIC Flag in rb_add_method?

From: "Charles E. Thornton" <ruby-core@...>
Date: 2005-11-15 03:21:16 UTC
List: ruby-core #6624
Nikolai Weibull wrote:

>Charles E. Thornton wrote:
>
>  
>
>>What does NOEX_NOSUPER Represent?
>>    
>>
>
>It seems to mean that super can't be called from this method.
>NOEX_UNDEF does the same thing, does it seems to imply that the
>superclass won't be searched for a method definition either..  Check out
>rb_undef_method in class.c (line 757).
>
>You know of grep, right? ;-)
>
>  
>
>>HERE I get confused AGAIN -- We have already ADDED THE METHOD
>>and now WE ADD a second one?    What is  SCOPE_MODFUNC represent?
>>
>>       if (scope_vmode == SCOPE_MODFUNC) {
>>       rb_add_method(rb_singleton_class(ruby_class),
>>                 node->nd_mid, defn, NOEX_PUBLIC);
>>       }
>>    
>>
>
>Is it a module function, perchance?
>
>        nikolai
>
>  
>
Thanks again --- Seems Simple when you describe it --- I am beginning to
feel like Homer Simpson :-) -- DUH !!!

                 Chuck

-- 
GodFather -- 667 Neighbor of the Beast


In This Thread

Prev Next