[#6660] Ruby on Neko ? — Nicolas Cannasse <ncannasse@...>

Hi folks,

14 messages 2005/11/19

[#6672] testing for hardlink with "test(?-, ...)" flawed on Windows — noreply@...

Bugs item #2858, was opened at 2005-11-20 16:35

13 messages 2005/11/20

[#6684] semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...>

Hi all,

81 messages 2005/11/21
[#6685] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Mauricio Fern疣dez <mfp@...> 2005/11/22

On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:22:59AM +0900, Stefan Kaes wrote:

[#6686] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:

[#6687] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/11/22

On Nov 21, 2005, at 4:37 PM, Stefan Kaes wrote:

[#6689] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

Eric Hodel wrote:

[#6693] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/11/22

Hi,

[#6695] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#6718] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — mathew <meta@...> 2005/11/22

[#6722] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

mathew wrote:

[#6707] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/11/22

Hi --

[#6708] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

David A. Black wrote:

[#6714] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/11/22

Hi --

[#6717] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

David A. Black wrote:

[#6798] ruby 1.8.4 preview2 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hi,

37 messages 2005/11/30

Re: 1.8.4 p1, warning roundup

From: Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
Date: 2005-11-02 16:54:49 UTC
List: ruby-core #6549
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Daniel Berger wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Solaris 10
> gcc 3.4.4
> 
> Here's the latest round of warnings from 1.8.4 p1, excluding the "suggested
> parantheses" and "type punned pointer" warnings:
> 
> # Make warnings
> make: Warning: Illegal dependency list for target `.DEFAULT'

Which make are you using?  (Sun, GNU, ...)
        [...]
> # Disturbing linker warnings
> ld: warning: symbol `numcodes' has differing sizes:
> 	(file /opt/csw/lib/libncurses.so value=0xa0; file
        [...]

which ld?
> 
> # More on the make warning, from the make man page:
> .DEFAULT:               If it has an entry in the  makefile,
> 

Do you have a script to collect, and collate, this information?  I
don't mind reproducing this for

gcc (GCC) 3.4.3
GNU Make version 3.79.1, by Richard Stallman and Roland McGrath.
Built for sparc-sun-solaris2.9

if that would help.  
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Dan
> 
        Hugh
> 


In This Thread