[#6660] Ruby on Neko ? — Nicolas Cannasse <ncannasse@...>

Hi folks,

14 messages 2005/11/19

[#6672] testing for hardlink with "test(?-, ...)" flawed on Windows — noreply@...

Bugs item #2858, was opened at 2005-11-20 16:35

13 messages 2005/11/20

[#6684] semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...>

Hi all,

81 messages 2005/11/21
[#6685] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Mauricio Fern疣dez <mfp@...> 2005/11/22

On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:22:59AM +0900, Stefan Kaes wrote:

[#6686] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:

[#6687] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/11/22

On Nov 21, 2005, at 4:37 PM, Stefan Kaes wrote:

[#6689] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

Eric Hodel wrote:

[#6693] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/11/22

Hi,

[#6695] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#6718] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — mathew <meta@...> 2005/11/22

[#6722] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

mathew wrote:

[#6707] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/11/22

Hi --

[#6708] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

David A. Black wrote:

[#6714] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/11/22

Hi --

[#6717] Re: semenatics of if/unless/while statement modifiers — Stefan Kaes <skaes@...> 2005/11/22

David A. Black wrote:

[#6798] ruby 1.8.4 preview2 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hi,

37 messages 2005/11/30

Re: Socket Documentation

From: Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Date: 2005-11-11 00:31:38 UTC
List: ruby-core #6610
On 11/11/05, H. Yamamoto <ocean@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp> wrote:
>
> >
> >Time to commit is variable.  Docs are regenerated when a few things
> >have changed.
> >
> >Gavin
>
> Gavin, aren't you a commiter? There is you name in CVS log.
>
> Revision : 1.16
> Date : 2003/1/20 7:16:1
> Author : 'gsinclair'
> State : 'Exp'
> Lines : +375 -27
> Description :
> Added RDoc comments.
>
> Maybe you lost CVS account when ruby-cvs was cracked?

Yeah, I was.  When the system changed after the cracks, committers
needed to sort themselves out with some GPG keys or something.  I've
spent about 6 hours trying to do that but am too dense to make it
work.

Methinks it's time to try again :)

Gavin

P.S. Can someone please commit the most recent patch in this thread? 
Zach is planning to do more Socket documentation at some stage, but I
don't think he's likely to begin until this one is committed.


In This Thread