[#5563] Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>

Lately, I've been thinking about the future of ruby

44 messages 2005/08/19
[#5564] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/08/19

On 8/19/05, Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@yahoo.com> wrote:

[#5571] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/08/19

--- Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:

[#5574] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — TRANS <transfire@...> 2005/08/20

Just wanted to add a few things.

[#5581] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/08/20

On 8/19/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:

[#5583] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/08/20

Hi --

[#5585] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/08/20

--- "David A. Black" <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:

[#5609] Pathname#walk for traversing path nodes (patch) — ES <ruby-ml@...>

Here is a small addition to Pathname against 1.9, probably suited

20 messages 2005/08/22

Re: Pathname#walk for traversing path nodes (patch)

From: TRANS <transfire@...>
Date: 2005-08-25 12:47:18 UTC
List: ruby-core #5678
On 8/25/05, Tanaka Akira <akr@m17n.org> wrote:
> In article <430BB56D.8010506@magical-cat.org>,
>   ES <ruby-ml@magical-cat.org> writes:
> 
> >> It seems that Pathname#walk doesn't yield the root directory.
> >> Is it intended?  How useful/unuseful with this behavior?
> 
> I'd like to hear your usage of Pathname#walk.
> I want to know at least one usage of the method before I introduce it
> to pathname.rb.

If so, will you also introduce "ascending" version? I can easily think
of a use for that, eg. what rake does when looking for a Rakefile.


( o _  カラチ
 //    trans.
/ \    transfire@gmail.com

In This Thread