[#5524] Division weirdness in 1.9 — "Florian Frank" <flori@...>
Hi,
[#5536] bug in variable assignment — Mauricio Fern疣dez <mfp@...>
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 11:36:22AM +0900, nobuyoshi nakada wrote:
hi,
Hi,
[#5552] Exceptions in threads all get converted to a TypeError — Paul van Tilburg <paul@...>
Hey all,
[#5563] Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>
Lately, I've been thinking about the future of ruby
On 8/19/05, Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@yahoo.com> wrote:
--- Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
Just wanted to add a few things.
On 8/19/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi --
--- "David A. Black" <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
On 8/20/05, Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 8/20/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/19/05, Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@yahoo.com> wrote:
--- Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
On 20 Aug 2005, at 02:05, Eric Mahurin wrote:
Eric Hodel wrote:
Eric Mahurin wrote:
Hi,
--- SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
Hi,
--- SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#5609] Pathname#walk for traversing path nodes (patch) — ES <ruby-ml@...>
Here is a small addition to Pathname against 1.9, probably suited
Evan Webb wrote:
In article <43094510.6090406@magical-cat.org>,
[#5651] File.extname edge case bug? — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#5662] Postgrey — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>
Hi,
[#5676] uri test failures. (Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby/lib, ruby/lib/uri: Lovely RDOC patches from mathew (metaATpoboxDOTcom) on URI/* and getoptlong.rb) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>
In article <20050824050801.5B4E0C671F@lithium.ruby-lang.org>,
[#5680] Problem with mkmf and spaces in directory names? — noreply@...
Bugs item #2308, was opened at 2005-08-25 13:42
[#5685] Wilderness Project — "Charles E. Thornton" <ruby-core@...>
OK - I see where ELTS_SHARED is used to implement COPY-ON-WRITE
Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods
On 19 Aug 2005, at 10:03, Eric Mahurin wrote:
> Another thing that hinders performance optimizations is the
> lack of the ability to say that a method is not overridable in
> any derived classes. This mostly applies to many methods in
> Object and Kernel (because everything gets those methods), but
> could apply elswhere if the VM/compiler couldn't determine the
> exact class but possibly the kind_of. Here are methods in
> Object that would be advantageous to inline (and not allow to
> be overridden) for performance:
>
> __id__ __send__ class equal? extend freeze frozen?
> id instance_eval instance_of? instance_variable_get
> instance_variable_set instance_variables is_a? kind_of?
> method methods nil? object_id private_methods
> protected_methods public_methods remove_instance_variable
> respond_to? send singleton_method_added
> singleton_method_removed singleton_method_undefined
> singleton_methods taint tainted? untaint
I either never call these methods, or would use them for making proxy
objects.
send can be quite useful to override, and respond_to? pairs with
method_missing, so it can't be in the list. id is used extensively
by Rails, and is deprecated anyhow.
I don't see why remove_instance_variable is on the list. I may *not*
want to remove certain instance variables.
Also, we couldn't make dead-simple proxies like this:
class BlankSlate
instance_methods.each { |m| undef_method m unless m =~ /^__/ }
end
class Proxy < BlankSlate
def initialize(obj)
@obj = obj
end
def method_missing(sym, *args, &block)
@obj.__send__(sym, *args, &block)
end
end
class Foo
def x; y; end
protected
def y; @y = :stuff; end
end
foo = Foo.new
dfoo = Proxy.new foo
p foo.protected_methods
p dfoo.protected_methods
p dfoo.send :x
p dfoo.instance_variables
--
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://segment7.net
FEC2 57F1 D465 EB15 5D6E 7C11 332A 551C 796C 9F04