[#5524] Division weirdness in 1.9 — "Florian Frank" <flori@...>
Hi,
[#5536] bug in variable assignment — Mauricio Fern疣dez <mfp@...>
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 11:36:22AM +0900, nobuyoshi nakada wrote:
hi,
Hi,
[#5552] Exceptions in threads all get converted to a TypeError — Paul van Tilburg <paul@...>
Hey all,
[#5563] Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>
Lately, I've been thinking about the future of ruby
On 8/19/05, Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@yahoo.com> wrote:
--- Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
Just wanted to add a few things.
On 8/19/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi --
--- "David A. Black" <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
On 8/20/05, Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 8/20/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/19/05, Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@yahoo.com> wrote:
--- Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
On 20 Aug 2005, at 02:05, Eric Mahurin wrote:
Eric Hodel wrote:
Eric Mahurin wrote:
Hi,
--- SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
Hi,
--- SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#5609] Pathname#walk for traversing path nodes (patch) — ES <ruby-ml@...>
Here is a small addition to Pathname against 1.9, probably suited
Evan Webb wrote:
In article <43094510.6090406@magical-cat.org>,
[#5651] File.extname edge case bug? — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#5662] Postgrey — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>
Hi,
[#5676] uri test failures. (Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby/lib, ruby/lib/uri: Lovely RDOC patches from mathew (metaATpoboxDOTcom) on URI/* and getoptlong.rb) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>
In article <20050824050801.5B4E0C671F@lithium.ruby-lang.org>,
[#5680] Problem with mkmf and spaces in directory names? — noreply@...
Bugs item #2308, was opened at 2005-08-25 13:42
[#5685] Wilderness Project — "Charles E. Thornton" <ruby-core@...>
OK - I see where ELTS_SHARED is used to implement COPY-ON-WRITE
Re: Gateway comp.lang.ruby -> ruby-talk
On 28 Aug 2005, at 10:17, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > On Sun, 28 Aug 2005, Shugo Maeda wrote: > > >> Oh, I'm sorry. Postgrey was stopped on Thu Aug 25 for the other >> reason. >> I hope there is no problem now. I'll configure the whitelist before >> restarting postgrey. >> > > I wonder how many months this postgrey thing will stay effective. > Isn't it > easy for spammers to get around it? I bet most spam tools of 2006 will > include the feature of trying every address twice with a delay of N > minutes in between tries... Postgrey has auto-whitelisting where well-behaved hosts will no longer experience a delay. After a month or so the delay could be increased. I use greylisting as a cheap way of allowing less mail to reach a more CPU intensive spam checker. -- Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://segment7.net FEC2 57F1 D465 EB15 5D6E 7C11 332A 551C 796C 9F04