[#5524] Division weirdness in 1.9 — "Florian Frank" <flori@...>
Hi,
[#5536] bug in variable assignment — Mauricio Fern疣dez <mfp@...>
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 11:36:22AM +0900, nobuyoshi nakada wrote:
hi,
Hi,
[#5552] Exceptions in threads all get converted to a TypeError — Paul van Tilburg <paul@...>
Hey all,
[#5563] Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>
Lately, I've been thinking about the future of ruby
On 8/19/05, Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@yahoo.com> wrote:
--- Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
Just wanted to add a few things.
On 8/19/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi --
--- "David A. Black" <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
On 8/20/05, Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 8/20/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/19/05, Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@yahoo.com> wrote:
--- Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
On 20 Aug 2005, at 02:05, Eric Mahurin wrote:
Eric Hodel wrote:
Eric Mahurin wrote:
Hi,
--- SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
Hi,
--- SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#5609] Pathname#walk for traversing path nodes (patch) — ES <ruby-ml@...>
Here is a small addition to Pathname against 1.9, probably suited
Evan Webb wrote:
In article <43094510.6090406@magical-cat.org>,
[#5651] File.extname edge case bug? — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#5662] Postgrey — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>
Hi,
[#5676] uri test failures. (Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby/lib, ruby/lib/uri: Lovely RDOC patches from mathew (metaATpoboxDOTcom) on URI/* and getoptlong.rb) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>
In article <20050824050801.5B4E0C671F@lithium.ruby-lang.org>,
[#5680] Problem with mkmf and spaces in directory names? — noreply@...
Bugs item #2308, was opened at 2005-08-25 13:42
[#5685] Wilderness Project — "Charles E. Thornton" <ruby-core@...>
OK - I see where ELTS_SHARED is used to implement COPY-ON-WRITE
Re: File.extname edge case bug?
Hi --
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Daniel Berger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Ruby 1.8.2
> Solaris 10
>
> Should File.extname("..") return "" or "."? It currently returns ".".
>
> The comments in the source say that it returns an empty string if the string
> provided as an argument begins with a "." and is the only "." in the string.
>
> I would argue that any string that begins with a ".", regardless of how many
> total "." there are in the string, should return an empty string. My opinion
> is based on years of convention. I have never, ever seen string that began
> with "." and had an extension as well. No one ever does this afaik.
>
> Am I wrong? Thoughts?
I see a number of them in my home directory, including:
./.mime.types
./.lynx.cfg
./.ruby.vim
./ruby/.rbconfig.time
./rubycentral/html/.index.html.swp
and a ton of Emacs and svn save files of various kinds.
David
--
David A. Black
dblack@wobblini.net