[#5563] Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>

Lately, I've been thinking about the future of ruby

44 messages 2005/08/19
[#5564] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/08/19

On 8/19/05, Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@yahoo.com> wrote:

[#5571] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/08/19

--- Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:

[#5574] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — TRANS <transfire@...> 2005/08/20

Just wanted to add a few things.

[#5581] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/08/20

On 8/19/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:

[#5583] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/08/20

Hi --

[#5585] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/08/20

--- "David A. Black" <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:

[#5609] Pathname#walk for traversing path nodes (patch) — ES <ruby-ml@...>

Here is a small addition to Pathname against 1.9, probably suited

20 messages 2005/08/22

Re: [ ruby-Bugs-2301 ] ruby182-15.exe CTD's on installation

From: Tom Copeland <tom@...>
Date: 2005-08-24 20:54:04 UTC
List: ruby-core #5673
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 05:02 +0900, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
> Bugs item #2301, was opened at 2005-08-24 19:55
> You can respond by visiting: 
> http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=2301&group_id=426
> 
> Category: None
> Group: None
> Status: Open
> Resolution: None
> Priority: 3
> Submitted By: Donald Stadler (dstadler66)
> Assigned to: Nobody (None)
> Summary: ruby182-15.exe CTD's on installation
> 
> Initial Comment:
> I have downloaded the Ruby installation program several times and each time I run it it crashes. I have also tried the previous version and that also crashes.
> 
> I believed it might have something to do with hard drive problems so I downloaded to another hard drive. Same result. 
> 
> So I think it's either Windoze or Ruby. Is there any alternate method to install Ruby?

I've closed this with a note to the submitter that he should post this
bug on the "Ruby Installer" project...

Tom



In This Thread

Prev Next