[#5524] Division weirdness in 1.9 — "Florian Frank" <flori@...>
Hi,
[#5536] bug in variable assignment — Mauricio Fern疣dez <mfp@...>
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 11:36:22AM +0900, nobuyoshi nakada wrote:
hi,
Hi,
[#5552] Exceptions in threads all get converted to a TypeError — Paul van Tilburg <paul@...>
Hey all,
[#5563] Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>
Lately, I've been thinking about the future of ruby
On 8/19/05, Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@yahoo.com> wrote:
--- Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
Just wanted to add a few things.
On 8/19/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi --
--- "David A. Black" <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
On 8/20/05, Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 8/20/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/19/05, Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@yahoo.com> wrote:
--- Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
On 20 Aug 2005, at 02:05, Eric Mahurin wrote:
Eric Hodel wrote:
Eric Mahurin wrote:
Hi,
--- SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
Hi,
--- SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#5609] Pathname#walk for traversing path nodes (patch) — ES <ruby-ml@...>
Here is a small addition to Pathname against 1.9, probably suited
Evan Webb wrote:
In article <43094510.6090406@magical-cat.org>,
[#5651] File.extname edge case bug? — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#5662] Postgrey — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>
Hi,
[#5676] uri test failures. (Re: [ruby-cvs] ruby/lib, ruby/lib/uri: Lovely RDOC patches from mathew (metaATpoboxDOTcom) on URI/* and getoptlong.rb) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>
In article <20050824050801.5B4E0C671F@lithium.ruby-lang.org>,
[#5680] Problem with mkmf and spaces in directory names? — noreply@...
Bugs item #2308, was opened at 2005-08-25 13:42
[#5685] Wilderness Project — "Charles E. Thornton" <ruby-core@...>
OK - I see where ELTS_SHARED is used to implement COPY-ON-WRITE
Wandering in the Wilderness Project
That leaves Question #2 and an Extra Thought
2) 'special_generic_ivar' - a) Is this to trigger Garbage Collection
ONLY for Special Constant Values?
- b) If it is - Is it because there is no real
object in Object Space to trigger GC?
2a) 'Special Constant' Values are defined as?
aa) rb_special_const_p(obj) returns TRUE if 'obj' is
a Special Constant Value:
rb_special_const_p(obj)
VALUE obj
{
if (SPECIAL_CONST_P(obj)) return Qtrue;
return Qfalse;
}
bb) SPECIAL_CONST_P(obj) returns TRUE if
( IMMEDIATE_P(obj) || !RTEST(obj) ) is TRUE
IMMEDIATE_P(obj) is TRUE if ( (obj) & 03 ) is non-zero
!RTEST(obj) is TRUE if obj = is not QNIL & is not QFALSE
Now am I crazy or does "rb_special_const_p(obj)" return TRUE
only if:
1) lsb 0 = 1 (FIXNUM)
2) lsb 1 = 1 (SYMBOL, TRUE, or UNDEF)
3) !RTEST == TRUE if ( not NIL and not FALSE)
WHY are QNIL and QFALSE excluded in a test for
non-reference VALUES??
Did I fail LOGIC 101? (Hope Not, I a Computer Science Degree!)
--
GodFather -- 667 Neighbor of the Beast