[#5563] Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>

Lately, I've been thinking about the future of ruby

44 messages 2005/08/19
[#5564] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/08/19

On 8/19/05, Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@yahoo.com> wrote:

[#5571] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/08/19

--- Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:

[#5574] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — TRANS <transfire@...> 2005/08/20

Just wanted to add a few things.

[#5581] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/08/20

On 8/19/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:

[#5583] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/08/20

Hi --

[#5585] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/08/20

--- "David A. Black" <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:

[#5609] Pathname#walk for traversing path nodes (patch) — ES <ruby-ml@...>

Here is a small addition to Pathname against 1.9, probably suited

20 messages 2005/08/22

Re: Division weirdness in 1.9

From: Jim Freeze <jimfreeze@...>
Date: 2005-08-03 23:30:27 UTC
List: ruby-core #5526
On 8/3/05, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/3/05, Florian Frank <flori@nixe.ping.de> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > p [ 1 / 3.0, 1.0 / 3 ] # => [0, 0.333333333333333]

[Not sure if the previous message got thru]

1.8.x doesn't behave this way.
This goes against a long legacy of how typecasting is applied in algebraic
equations.
I would say this is most certainly a bug.


-- 
Jim Freeze


In This Thread