[#5563] Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>

Lately, I've been thinking about the future of ruby

44 messages 2005/08/19
[#5564] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/08/19

On 8/19/05, Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@yahoo.com> wrote:

[#5571] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/08/19

--- Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:

[#5574] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — TRANS <transfire@...> 2005/08/20

Just wanted to add a few things.

[#5581] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/08/20

On 8/19/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:

[#5583] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/08/20

Hi --

[#5585] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/08/20

--- "David A. Black" <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:

[#5609] Pathname#walk for traversing path nodes (patch) — ES <ruby-ml@...>

Here is a small addition to Pathname against 1.9, probably suited

20 messages 2005/08/22

Re: File.extname edge case bug?

From: mathew <meta@...>
Date: 2005-08-23 19:30:08 UTC
List: ruby-core #5656
Daniel Berger wrote:

> Should File.extname("..") return "" or "."?  It currently returns ".".
>
> The comments in the source say that it returns an empty string if the 
> string provided as an argument begins with a "." and is the only "." 
> in the string.
>
> I would argue that any string that begins with a ".", regardless of 
> how many total "." there are in the string, should return an empty 
> string. My opinion is based on years of convention.  I have never, 
> ever seen string that began with "." and had an extension as well.  No 
> one ever does this afaik. 


I agree that extname("..") should return "", but I disagree with the 
rest of your reasoning. As others have mentioned, there are .config.ext 
files around.

I think any string which *ends* with a "." should return "". I don't 
think the start of the string should have anything to do with the output 
of extname.


mathew

In This Thread