[#5563] Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>

Lately, I've been thinking about the future of ruby

44 messages 2005/08/19
[#5564] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/08/19

On 8/19/05, Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@yahoo.com> wrote:

[#5571] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/08/19

--- Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:

[#5574] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — TRANS <transfire@...> 2005/08/20

Just wanted to add a few things.

[#5581] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/08/20

On 8/19/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:

[#5583] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/08/20

Hi --

[#5585] Re: Non-overridable and non-redefinable methods — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...> 2005/08/20

--- "David A. Black" <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:

[#5609] Pathname#walk for traversing path nodes (patch) — ES <ruby-ml@...>

Here is a small addition to Pathname against 1.9, probably suited

20 messages 2005/08/22

Re: Gateway comp.lang.ruby -> ruby-talk

From: Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>
Date: 2005-08-28 12:52:34 UTC
List: ruby-core #5699
Hi,

daz wrote:
> It is very /unlikely/ that the gateway software will respond to
> 45x SMTP error codes and retry delivery of posts because it is
> almost completely dumb ;)
>
> As you may know, the gateway (from your point-of-view) is just
> another ruby-talk ML subscriber posting from a single account.
>
> According to the reference in your post and this link, :
> http://www.greylisting.org/whitelisting.shtml , a whitelisting
> facility is provided.

Oh, I'm sorry.

Postgrey was stopped on Thu Aug 25 for the other reason.  I hope
there is no problem now.

I'll configure the whitelist before restarting postgrey.

Thanks a lot,
Shugo

In This Thread