[#316551] "ensure" hiding actual error — Nit Khair <sentinel.2001@...>

In my main program I have a "begin ensure end".

19 messages 2008/10/01
[#316566] Re: "ensure" hiding actual error — "Robert Klemme" <shortcutter@...> 2008/10/01

2008/10/1 Nit Khair <sentinel.2001@gmx.com>:

[#316570] Re: "ensure" hiding actual error — Nit Khair <sentinel.2001@...> 2008/10/01

Robert Klemme wrote:

[#316579] Re: "ensure" hiding actual error — "Robert Klemme" <shortcutter@...> 2008/10/01

2008/10/1 Nit Khair <sentinel.2001@gmx.com>:

[#316583] Re: "ensure" hiding actual error — Nit Khair <sentinel.2001@...> 2008/10/01

Robert Klemme wrote:

[#316585] Re: "ensure" hiding actual error — "Thomas B." <tpreal@...> 2008/10/01

Nit Khair wrote:

[#316589] Re: "ensure" hiding actual error — "Robert Klemme" <shortcutter@...> 2008/10/01

2008/10/1 Thomas B. <tpreal@gmail.com>:

[#316617] Ordered hash hack for < ruby 1.9? — Ben Johnson <bjohnson@...>

I am having an issue testing my code because hashes don't have a

22 messages 2008/10/01
[#316620] Re: Ordered hash hack for < ruby 1.9? — "Patrick Doyle" <wpdster@...> 2008/10/01

Why not iterate over myhash.keys.sort instead of just myhash.keys?

[#316704] Problem extending (adding methods) to class — Nit Khair <sentinel.2001@...>

I am trying to extend a class developed by someone else (its from the

24 messages 2008/10/02
[#316707] Re: Problem extending (adding methods) to class — Nit Khair <sentinel.2001@...> 2008/10/02

Nit Khair wrote:

[#316723] Is Assignment in a Conditional an Idiom? — worthee@...

Hi

19 messages 2008/10/02

[#316839] class << self — "Patrick Doyle" <wpdster@...>

Sorry if this is a FAQ, but I was just looking at some Ruby code and

14 messages 2008/10/03

[#316847] Making/Compiling Gems on Windows with MinGW — Cayce Balara <house@...>

Whenever I try to install a gem that doesn't have a precompiled binary

11 messages 2008/10/03

[#316907] stream closed (IOError) — "Eric Will" <rakaur@...>

This code:

17 messages 2008/10/05
[#316910] Re: stream closed (IOError) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/10/05

Hi,

[#316920] Re: stream closed (IOError) — "Eric Will" <rakaur@...> 2008/10/05

Line 231 is the @socket.close line. Nothing gets done to the socket

[#316925] Re: stream closed (IOError) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/10/05

Hi,

[#316926] Re: stream closed (IOError) — "Eric Will" <rakaur@...> 2008/10/05

On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#316927] Re: stream closed (IOError) — Iki Baz Castillo <ibc@...> 2008/10/05

El Domingo, 5 de Octubre de 2008, Eric Will escribi=F3:

[#316968] Ruby lacks atfork : The evil that lives in fork... — John Carter <john.carter@...>

Consider this simple usage of Thread and Process....

12 messages 2008/10/06

[#316978] Concurent (using threads) slower than sequential -doubt — Carlos Ortega <caof2005@...>

Hi Folks.

10 messages 2008/10/06

[#316988] Problem with comparing huge amount of strings — Jan Fischer <janfischer@...>

Hello together,

11 messages 2008/10/06

[#317122] Demand that Obama release his college records! Where is the media? — Micky <guuwwe@...>

Why is it important to see Obama's college records? Because the media

11 messages 2008/10/07

[#317126] Ruby with Oracle forward slash error — Sam Sang <younoeme@...>

Hi,

12 messages 2008/10/07

[#317127] Looking for more Ruby-like way to create an array — Steve Nicholson <ssteve@...>

I'm creating an array that is the result of the members of another array

11 messages 2008/10/07

[#317326] Thread: super should be first line or last line? — "christoforever@..." <christoforever@...>

While playing around with ruby threads I noticed that if you dont call

11 messages 2008/10/10

[#317337] Modular Arithmetic (#179) — Matthew Moss <matt@...>

-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D=

15 messages 2008/10/10

[#317395] Automatic ClassLoader (to eliminate 'require') — Alexey Petrushin <axyd80@...>

Hello!

17 messages 2008/10/11
[#317397] Re: Automatic ClassLoader (to eliminate 'require') — Erik Veenstra <erikveen@...> 2008/10/11

module AutoRequire

[#317402] Re: Automatic ClassLoader (to eliminate 'require') — Alexey Petrushin <axyd80@...> 2008/10/11

Thanks! It works! :)

[#317403] Re: Automatic ClassLoader (to eliminate 'require') — "Thomas B." <tpreal@...> 2008/10/11

Alexey Petrushin wrote:

[#317422] Sample for Metaprogramming — relzne@...

Hi.

13 messages 2008/10/11

[#317452] Updating Ruby 1.8.6 to 1.8.6-p287 in Debian 4 — The Neurochild <neurochild@...>

Hi

21 messages 2008/10/12

[#317502] Sorting help — Binh Ly <binh@...>

Hello All,

19 messages 2008/10/12

[#317601] Using DBI and MySQL gems — Owein Herrmann <oherrmann@...>

Quick question:

14 messages 2008/10/13

[#317758] Big endian convention in Ruby — Zangief Ief <z4n9ief@...>

Hello,

18 messages 2008/10/16
[#317767] Re: Big endian convention in Ruby — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2008/10/16

On 16.10.2008 10:26, Zangief Ief wrote:

[#317772] Re: Big endian convention in Ruby — Zangief Ief <z4n9ief@...> 2008/10/16

Thanks you for you answer.

[#317800] Re: Big endian convention in Ruby — Brian Candler <b.candler@...> 2008/10/16

Zangief Ief wrote:

[#317820] Re: Big endian convention in Ruby — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2008/10/16

On 16.10.2008 15:25, Brian Candler wrote:

[#317936] Re: Big endian convention in Ruby — Zangief Ief <z4n9ief@...> 2008/10/17

Thank you all for your help.

[#317759] How to go from a ruby script to a working website? — Ralph Wood <esmero@...>

As you've probably guessed by the title, total newbie here.

12 messages 2008/10/16

[#317769] A Ruby block question — David Trasbo <davidtrasbo@...>

I am in need of making a method that accepts a block. It basicly needs

23 messages 2008/10/16
[#317770] Re: A Ruby block question — Stefano Crocco <stefano.crocco@...> 2008/10/16

Alle Thursday 16 October 2008, David Trasbo ha scritto:

[#317773] Re: A Ruby block question — David Trasbo <davidtrasbo@...> 2008/10/16

Stefano Crocco wrote:

[#317779] Re: A Ruby block question — Stefano Crocco <stefano.crocco@...> 2008/10/16

Alle Thursday 16 October 2008, David Trasbo ha scritto:

[#317780] Re: A Ruby block question — David Trasbo <davidtrasbo@...> 2008/10/16

Stefano Crocco wrote:

[#317776] I found way to protect Source Code! :) — Alexey Petrushin <axyd80@...>

Hello!

34 messages 2008/10/16
[#317859] Re: I found way to protect Source Code! :) — Ade Inovica <adrian.teasdale@...> 2008/10/16

Interesting solution. May I also suggest that you try

[#317869] Re: I found way to protect Source Code! :) — Mike Gold <mike.gold.4433@...> 2008/10/16

Ade Inovica wrote:

[#317886] Re: I found way to protect Source Code! :) — Sasha Bee <rubyman77@...> 2008/10/17

Mike Gold wrote:

[#317956] Re: I found way to protect Source Code! :) — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/10/17

[#317878] instance counter — Pierre Lebrun <anthonylebrun@...>

Please forgive the trite nature of this question, I'm new to ruby and OO

21 messages 2008/10/17
[#317880] Re: instance counter — Tommy Nordgren <tommy.nordgren@...> 2008/10/17

[#317883] Re: instance counter — Mike Gold <mike.gold.4433@...> 2008/10/17

Tommy Nordgren wrote:

[#317903] Re: instance counter — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2008/10/17

On 17.10.2008 07:19, Mike Gold wrote:

[#317938] Error Exception if script doesn't run — jackster the jackle <johnsheahan@...>

I need to know if my script fails to run for any reason and capture the

20 messages 2008/10/17
[#317941] Re: Error Exception if script doesn't run — Brian Candler <b.candler@...> 2008/10/17

jackster the jackle wrote:

[#317967] Re: Error Exception if script doesn't run — jackster the jackle <johnsheahan@...> 2008/10/17

I notice that any shell commands that I have in the script that fail do

[#317972] Re: Error Exception if script doesn't run — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/10/17

jackster the jackle wrote:

[#317974] Re: Error Exception if script doesn't run — jackster the jackle <johnsheahan@...> 2008/10/17

It seems to work but not for this command, perhaps since scp gets

[#317979] Re: Error Exception if script doesn't run — Tim Hunter <TimHunter@...> 2008/10/18

jackster the jackle wrote:

[#317992] Re: Error Exception if script doesn't run — jackster the jackle <johnsheahan@...> 2008/10/18

Tim Hunter wrote:

[#317966] Counting — Tom Clarke <thomas.clarke08@...>

How would i go about making Ruby count to say 1000 usin only multiples

18 messages 2008/10/17

[#318286] Trollop 1.10 released — William Morgan <wmorgan-ruby-talk@...>

Trollop version 1.10 has been released!

12 messages 2008/10/22

[#318309] Is there a method_eval or similar thing ? — Nit Khair <sentinel.2001@...>

I have a method called askyesno which takes a string and returns whether

13 messages 2008/10/22

[#318323] What exactly does "rubyish" or "ruby way" mean? — Nit Khair <sentinel.2001@...>

Over the last month I have been reading a lot of blogs, searching, going

12 messages 2008/10/22

[#318509] How to tell if two paths point to the same file? — Kenneth McDonald <kenneth.m.mcdonald@...>

I've tried using File.expand_path to normalize path names, but this

12 messages 2008/10/24

[#318523] RubyMacros 0.1.0 Released — "Caleb Clausen" <vikkous@...>

RubyMacros is a lisp-like macro pre-processor for Ruby. More than just a

15 messages 2008/10/24

[#318552] Join all text files in a folder, with a single line of Ruby code — luisbebop <luisbebop@...>

I did a single line of code in Ruby, which joins all text files in a

26 messages 2008/10/25
[#318556] Re: Join all text files in a folder, with a single line of Ruby code — "William James" <w_a_x_man@...> 2008/10/25

luisbebop wrote:

[#318574] Re: Join all text files in a folder, with a single line of Ruby code — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/10/25

William James wrote:

[#318607] Re: Join all text files in a folder, with a single line of Ruby code — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/10/26

Hi,

[#318622] Re: Join all text files in a folder, with a single line of Ruby code — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/10/26

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#318640] Re: Join all text files in a folder, with a single line of Ruby code — luisbebop <luisbebop@...> 2008/10/27

> ruby -pe'1' *

[#318641] Re: Join all text files in a folder, with a single line of Ruby code — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/10/27

luisbebop wrote:

[#318601] Hash.merge_add! extension - how does this code look? — "Greg Hauptmann" <greg.hauptmann.ruby@...>

Hi,

18 messages 2008/10/26
[#318632] Re: Hash.merge_add! extension - how does this code look? — Stefan Rusterholz <apeiros@...> 2008/10/26

Greg Hauptmann wrote:

[#318644] Re: Hash.merge_add! extension - how does this code look? — "Greg Hauptmann" <greg.hauptmann.ruby@...> 2008/10/27

thanks for highlighting this! Is the quickest way to normalise to Array via

[#318655] Re: Hash.merge_add! extension - how does this code look? — Stefan Rusterholz <apeiros@...> 2008/10/27

Greg Hauptmann wrote:

[#318656] Re: Hash.merge_add! extension - how does this code look? — "Greg Hauptmann" <greg.hauptmann.ruby@...> 2008/10/27

I just noticed the code suggested might have a problem when the

[#318721] automatic code conversion from Ruby to C ? — "Axel Etzold" <AEtzold@...>

Dear all,

16 messages 2008/10/27

[#318888] project manager panel in SciTE — Li Chen <chen_li3@...>

Hi all,

14 messages 2008/10/29

[#318896] RubyGems 1.3.1 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

= Announce: RubyGems Release 1.3.1

13 messages 2008/10/29

[#318970] Roguelike project? — Tim Mcd <tmcdowell@...>

Anyone interested in a Roguelike game written in Ruby/Ncurses project?

41 messages 2008/10/30
[#318976] Re: Roguelike project? — Matthew Moss <matt@...> 2008/10/30

> Anyone interested in a Roguelike game written in Ruby/Ncurses project?

[#319050] Re: Roguelike project? — "Michael Fellinger" <m.fellinger@...> 2008/10/31

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 3:42 AM, Matthew Moss <matt@moss.name> wrote:

[#319052] Re: Roguelike project? — Nit Khair <sentinel.2001@...> 2008/10/31

Michael Fellinger wrote:

[#319056] Re: Roguelike project? — "Michael Fellinger" <m.fellinger@...> 2008/10/31

On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 1:46 AM, Nit Khair <sentinel.2001@gmx.com> wrote:

[#319287] Re: Roguelike project? — Nit Khair <sentinel.2001@...> 2008/11/03

Michael Fellinger wrote:

[#319393] Re: Roguelike project? — Nit Khair <sentinel.2001@...> 2008/11/04

Nit Khair wrote:

[#319422] Re: Roguelike project? — Nit Khair <sentinel.2001@...> 2008/11/04

Nit Khair wrote:

[#319021] XML builder performance — Xin Zheng <crazygecko@...>

Hi all,

13 messages 2008/10/31

[#319055] How to access to local variables in enclosing scopes? — Yuh-Ruey Chen <maian330@...>

I'm familiar with other popular scripting languages (JS and Python),

34 messages 2008/10/31

[#319094] FFI 0.1.1 (Foreign Function Interface) for Ruby 1.8.6/7 and 1.9 — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>

The JRuby team is proud to announce the release of FFI for Ruby 1.8.6/7

62 messages 2008/10/31
[#319099] Re: [ANN] FFI 0.1.1 (Foreign Function Interface) for Ruby 1.8.6/7 and 1.9 — Thomas Hurst <tom.hurst@...> 2008/11/01

* Charles Oliver Nutter (charles.nutter@sun.com) wrote:

[#319101] Re: [ANN] FFI 0.1.1 (Foreign Function Interface) for Ruby 1.8.6/7 and 1.9 — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/11/01

Thomas Hurst wrote:

[#319113] Re: [ANN] FFI 0.1.1 (Foreign Function Interface) for Ruby 1.8.6/7 and 1.9 — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/11/01

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#319238] Re: [ANN] FFI 0.1.1 (Foreign Function Interface) for Ruby 1.8.6/7 and 1.9 — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...> 2008/11/03

On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 08:16:39AM +0900, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#319240] Re: [ANN] FFI 0.1.1 (Foreign Function Interface) for Ruby 1.8.6/7 and 1.9 — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/11/03

Sylvain Joyeux wrote:

[#319390] Re: [ANN] FFI 0.1.1 (Foreign Function Interface) for Ruby 1.8.6/7 and 1.9 — Ken Bloom <kbloom@...> 2008/11/04

On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:16:39 -0500, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#319391] Re: [ANN] FFI 0.1.1 (Foreign Function Interface) for Ruby 1.8.6/7 and 1.9 — "Sean O'Halpin" <sean.ohalpin@...> 2008/11/04

On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Ken Bloom <kbloom@gmail.com> wrote:

[#319395] Re: FFI 0.1.1 (Foreign Function Interface) for Ruby 1.8.6/7 and 1.9 — Nit Khair <sentinel.2001@...> 2008/11/04

Sean O'halpin wrote:

[#319428] Re: FFI 0.1.1 (Foreign Function Interface) for Ruby 1.8.6/7 and 1.9 — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/11/04

Nit Khair wrote:

[#319467] Re: FFI 0.1.1 (Foreign Function Interface) for Ruby 1.8.6/7 and 1.9 — "Sean O'Halpin" <sean.ohalpin@...> 2008/11/05

On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter

[#319468] Re: FFI 0.1.1 (Foreign Function Interface) for Ruby 1.8.6/7 and 1.9 — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/11/05

Sean O'Halpin wrote:

[#319535] Re: FFI 0.1.1 (Foreign Function Interface) for Ruby 1.8.6/7 and 1.9 — "Sean O'Halpin" <sean.ohalpin@...> 2008/11/05

On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:34 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter

[#319538] Re: FFI 0.1.1 (Foreign Function Interface) for Ruby 1.8.6/7 and 1.9 — Nit Khair <sentinel.2001@...> 2008/11/05

Sean O'halpin wrote:

[ANN] RubyMacros 0.1.0 Released

From: "Caleb Clausen" <vikkous@...>
Date: 2008-10-24 20:23:31 UTC
List: ruby-talk #318523
RubyMacros is a lisp-like macro pre-processor for Ruby. More than just a
purely textual substitution scheme, RubyMacros can manipulate and morph
Ruby parse trees (in the form of RedParse Nodes) at parse time in just about
any way you see fit.

Macros are programmed in ruby itself. And since parse trees are represented
in RedParse format, they're easier to use (programatically) and more object-
oriented than other available ruby parsetree formats. (RedParse Node format
is actually designed to be straightforward to use and to represent the
structure of ruby source code very closely.)

== Benefits:
 * Powerful and easy metaprogramming
 * Create better DSLs
 * Manipulate syntax trees to suit yourself
 * Access local variables and other caller context unavailable to methods
 * Macros as inline methods: should be slightly faster than equivalent methods

== Drawbacks:
Although in theory already as powerful as lisp macros, the current
implementation has a number of problems which added together make it merely
a proof of concept or toy at this point:
 * pre-processing is very, very slow (because of RedParse)
 * macro calls must be inside some sort of method;
 * straight out macro calls at the top level won't work
 * macros can't have blocks or receivers
 * some ruby syntax is unsupported in files using macros
 * files using macros must be loaded via Macro.require;
 * Kernel#require will not recognize macros
 * RedParse Node tree format will be changing slightly
 * macros cannot be scoped
 * no variable (or other) hygiene

== Requirements:
  RubyMacros requires RedParse.

== Install:
  gem install rubymacros

== Examples:
  macro simple(a,b)
    :(^a+^b)
  end
  def simple_user
    p simple(1,2)  #prints 3
  end

  #loop as a macro, should be a bit faster than the #loop method
  macro loop(body)
    :(while true
        ^body
      end
    )
  end

  #for more examples, see the examples/ directory

== New Syntax:
I have invented 3 new syntactical constructions in order to allow reasonably
easy to use macros. Macros themselves look just like methods except that
'macro' instead of 'def' is used to start the macro definition off. A form
literal is an expression surrounded by ':(' and ')'. The form escape operator
is '^'. '^' is a unary operator of fairly high precedence.

== Forms and Form Escapes:
Forms are an essential adjunct to macros. Forms represent quoted source
code, which has been parsed but not evaled yet. When a form literal is
executed, it returns a RedParse::Node representing the parse tree for the
enclosed source code. Within a form literal, a ^, used as a unary operator,
will escape the expression it controls, so that instead of being part of the
form's data, it is executed at the same time as the form literal, and the
result of an escaped expression (which should be a Node) is interpolated
into the form at that point. The whole effect is much like that of string
interpolations (#{}) inside string literals.

== How Macros Work
Typically, macros return a single form literal, which contains form escape
expressions within it which make use of the macro's parameters. However,
macro bodies may contain anything at all; more complicated macros will
likely not contain any forms. (Likewise, form literals may be used outside
macros, but the utility of doing so may be minimal.)

At parse time (well, really at method definition time, but in effect it's
much the same thing) method bodies are scanned for callsites which have the
names of known macros. When such a call is found, it is expanded as follows.
The parsetrees for the arguments to the callsite are passed as arguments to
the macro. The macro is expected to return a parsetree, which replaces the
macro callsite in the parsetree which contained it.

== License:
   LGPL

In This Thread

Prev Next