From: Redd Vinylene <reddvinylene@...>
Date: 2008-10-21T15:32:30+09:00
Subject: Re: I found way to protect Source Code! :)

------=_Part_1004_29119455.1224570825176
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I don't always trust my ISPs so I'd very much like to run my Rails apps
encrypted.

On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:24 AM, |||=[Mathspeedy]=||| |||=[Z3d0clan]=||| <
mathspeedy@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 05:07:59AM +0900, Alexey Petrushin wrote:
> > > Thanks for advices :)
> > >
> > > So, as I understood, there are:
> > >
> > > - Software as a Service, with owned hosting.
> > > Yes! This is the best one, but sometimes clients wants something
> > > 'physically' tangible :).
> > >
> > > - JRuby Compiler (http://wiki.jruby.org/wiki/JRuby_Compiler)
> > > It's fully finished and ready to use.
> > >
> > > Translates <name>.rb => <name>.class and because it's not one to one
> > > mapping there is an information lost, that can be seen as the
> > > obfuscation.
> > >
> > > There is no .class to .rb decompiler, and (though, I'm not sure) these
> > > .class files cannot be decompiled even to .java ones.
> > >
> > > - Zenobfuscate (http://blog.zenspider.com/zenobfuscate/)
> > > Has some limitations.
> > > I've choose Ruby for all it's goodnesses, and don't want to give back
> > > any of it. I'll better leave the product open than will agree to any
> > > limitation.
> > >
> > > - rubyencoder (rubyencoder.com)
> > > Somehow they do it, don't know though how.
> >
> > . . . or come up with a business model that doesn't rely on the
> > government trying to subvert natural laws.
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > It seems, that JRuby Compiler is really what i need :).
> > >
> > > I just want to rise barrier, to buy time if some company will try to
> > > build a copy-product. For sure they'll can reverse engineer it, but not
> > > so fast as if they will have original sources.
> > > There is no need to protect from hackers & cracks, my product will be
> > > free (but not open).
> >
> > So . . . what's the point of obscuring the code?
> >
> > --
> > Chad Perrin [ content licensed PDL: http://pdl.apotheon.org ]
> > Just tao it.  http://tao.apotheon.org
> >
>
>
> This language is opensource I think if everyone use it with closed source
> it
> will be like the C language not open source, just, encrypt it and
> send the decrypt key to the peoples that ask you for it, and make the key
> only work for X days or X ... (corrupt it) like with the GPG option ...
> --
> --
> --mathspeedy-1337_programer--
>



-- 
http://www.home.no/reddvinylene

------=_Part_1004_29119455.1224570825176--