From: "Pablo Q." Date: 2008-10-12T01:38:21+09:00 Subject: Re: [ANN] stickler 0.1.0 Released ------=_Part_9593_11502228.1223743254100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi Jeremy, I installed it but I got this error trying to setup the repository. I fixed it just installing progressbar (gem install progressbar). Great work. It seems useful in my case for the company that I work to make deployment in new servers easier. castor@castor-laptop:~$ stickler setup /home/castor/repos/ /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `gem_original_require': no such file to load -- progressbar (LoadError) from /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `require' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/stickler-0.1.0/lib/stickler/source.rb:3 from /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `gem_original_require' from /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `require' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/stickler-0.1.0/lib/stickler.rb:15 from /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `gem_original_require' from /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `require' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/stickler-0.1.0/bin/stickler:8 from /usr/bin/stickler:19:in `load' from /usr/bin/stickler:19 2008/10/10 Ryan Davis > > On Oct 10, 2008, at 13:48 , Jeremy Hinegardner wrote: > > 3.y.z "~> 3.0" >>>> 3.0.z "~> 3.0.0" >>>> 3.5.z to <4.0 "~> 3.5" >>>> 3.5.z to <3.6 "~> 3.5.0" >>>> >>> >>> Which is clearer than my english description, "matches a version from the >>> specified release up to but not including a release with a higher version >>> in the second most specific dot". (Clumsy, yes) >>> >> >> Yes, I understand what it means, and it is always hard to describe. That >> chart >> is a very nice demonstration. I was trying to figure out the best way to >> put it >> concisely and ended up coping the description from >> http://docs.rubygems.org/read/chapter/16#page74, that link is also >> displayed at >> the interactive prompt. >> >> "Approximately greater than" is definitely not what it is. How about >> "Pessimistically Greater Than" or "Greater Than Up to a Point"? Any >> other >> suggestions? >> > > "automatic range"? > > um... in hindsight, why didn't we use range notation? > > 3.y.z "3...4" > 3.0.z "3.0...4" > 3.5.z to <4.0 "3.5...4" > 3.5.z to <3.6 "3.5...3.6" > > or, because the dots are a tad ambiguous, dashes: > > 3.y.z "3-4" > 3.0.z "3.0-4" > 3.5.z to <4.0 "3.5-4" > 3.5.z to <3.6 "3.5-3.6" > > > -- Pablo Q. ------=_Part_9593_11502228.1223743254100--