[#27003] [Bug #2422] splat operator fails on array of 1 element — Raul Parolari <redmine@...>

Bug #2422: splat operator fails on array of 1 element

12 messages 2009/12/02

[#27025] [Backport #2431] StringIO#{gets,readlines} with "" (paragraph mode) trims last "\n" — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...>

Backport #2431: StringIO#{gets,readlines} with "" (paragraph mode) trims last "\n"

8 messages 2009/12/04

[#27086] [Feature #2454] OpenSSL has no maintainer — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

Feature #2454: OpenSSL has no maintainer

16 messages 2009/12/07

[#27120] #to_enum ignores block? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Is #to_enum ignoring its block expected?

11 messages 2009/12/09

[#27135] better GC? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Could I put in a small plea for a better GC?

56 messages 2009/12/10
[#27136] Re: better GC? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/12/11

Hi,

[#27476] Re: better GC? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2010/01/07

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:07:16AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#27477] Re: better GC? — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2010/01/07

Excerpts from Paul Brannan's message of Thu Jan 07 21:53:34 +0200 2010:

[#27563] Re: better GC? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2010/01/12

[#27199] [Backport #2488] thread usage can result in bad HANDLE — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Backport #2488: thread usage can result in bad HANDLE

12 messages 2009/12/16

[#27286] [Bug #2515] Array#select! — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #2515: Array#select!

17 messages 2009/12/22

[#27327] [Bug #2531] Ruby 1.8.7-p248 fails to cross-compile same version — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #2531: Ruby 1.8.7-p248 fails to cross-compile same version

9 messages 2009/12/25

[#27360] [Feature #2542] URI lib should be updated to RFC 39886 — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Feature #2542: URI lib should be updated to RFC 39886

15 messages 2009/12/31

[ruby-core:27326] Re: [Bug #2530] Future timestamps in 1.8.7-p248 generate recursive compilation process

From: Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Date: 2009-12-25 17:41:35 UTC
List: ruby-core #27326
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
> 2009/12/26 Luis Lavena <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
>
>> After the announcement of 1.8.7-p248, I've proceeded to download and ins=
tall it.
>>
>> During extraction, got several warnings about future timestamps, and ign=
ore them (see attached extract.error.log)
>>
>> My local clock is 12pm, 2009-12-25, UTC-3
>
> The first two line of extract.error.log is follows.
>
> | [2009-12-16 14:33:29] tar xzf
> /home/luis/.rvm/archives/ruby-1.8.7-p248.tar.gz -C /home/luis/.rvm/src
> | tar: ruby-1.8.7-p248/bin: time stamp 2009-12-24 06:37:32 is
> 662642.859822642 s in the future
>
> I guess your clock shows 2009-12-16.
>

For some weird reason, the clock of the machine has been stuck to that date=
!

I just restarted the system and is back to normal:

Fri Dec 25 14:39:39 ART 2009

> % ruby -e 'p Time.local(2009,12,24,6,37,32) - 662642.859822642'
> 2009-12-16 14:33:29 +0900
>
> I think Ruby 1.8.7 p248 is not released before 2009-12-16.

Thank you, seems I was trying to go back in time and install 1.8.7
ahead of its release.

Will check my other systems and reset the clocks.

Apologies for the noise.
--=20
Luis Lavena
AREA 17
-
Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add,
but rather when there is nothing more to take away.
Antoine de Saint-Exup=E9ry

In This Thread