[#27003] [Bug #2422] splat operator fails on array of 1 element — Raul Parolari <redmine@...>

Bug #2422: splat operator fails on array of 1 element

12 messages 2009/12/02

[#27025] [Backport #2431] StringIO#{gets,readlines} with "" (paragraph mode) trims last "\n" — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...>

Backport #2431: StringIO#{gets,readlines} with "" (paragraph mode) trims last "\n"

8 messages 2009/12/04

[#27086] [Feature #2454] OpenSSL has no maintainer — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

Feature #2454: OpenSSL has no maintainer

16 messages 2009/12/07

[#27120] #to_enum ignores block? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Is #to_enum ignoring its block expected?

11 messages 2009/12/09

[#27135] better GC? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Could I put in a small plea for a better GC?

56 messages 2009/12/10
[#27136] Re: better GC? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/12/11

Hi,

[#27476] Re: better GC? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2010/01/07

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:07:16AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#27477] Re: better GC? — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2010/01/07

Excerpts from Paul Brannan's message of Thu Jan 07 21:53:34 +0200 2010:

[#27563] Re: better GC? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2010/01/12

[#27199] [Backport #2488] thread usage can result in bad HANDLE — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Backport #2488: thread usage can result in bad HANDLE

12 messages 2009/12/16

[#27286] [Bug #2515] Array#select! — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #2515: Array#select!

17 messages 2009/12/22

[#27327] [Bug #2531] Ruby 1.8.7-p248 fails to cross-compile same version — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #2531: Ruby 1.8.7-p248 fails to cross-compile same version

9 messages 2009/12/25

[#27360] [Feature #2542] URI lib should be updated to RFC 39886 — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Feature #2542: URI lib should be updated to RFC 39886

15 messages 2009/12/31

[ruby-core:27115] Re: [Bug #2449] StringIO#ungetc behavior is contrary to its spec

From: "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...>
Date: 2009-12-09 13:58:21 UTC
List: ruby-core #27115
Hi,

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 08:02, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote=
:
> Spec has changed for 1.9:
>
> =A0call-seq:
> =A0 strio.ungetc(string) =A0 -> nil
>
> =A0Pushes back one character (passed as a parameter) onto *strio*
> =A0such that a subsequent buffered read will return it. =A0There is no
> =A0limitation for multiple pushbacks including pushing back behind the
> =A0beginning of the buffer string.

Yes.

> 1.8.7 inherits the behavior from 1.9, but spec statement has not been
> updated.

Do you mean this IO change (multiple pushbacks and behind the
beginning) should be backported to 1.8?

0% ruby19 -ve 'r,w =3D IO.pipe; r.ungetc(?a); p r.getc'
ruby 1.9.2dev (2009-12-08 trunk 26049) [i686-linux]
"a"
0% ruby -ve 'r,w =3D IO.pipe; r.ungetc(?a); p r.getc'
ruby 1.8.8dev (2009-12-07 revision 25983) [i686-linux]
-e:1:in `ungetc': unread stream (IOError)
	from -e:1
1%

// NaHi

In This Thread