[#27003] [Bug #2422] splat operator fails on array of 1 element — Raul Parolari <redmine@...>

Bug #2422: splat operator fails on array of 1 element

12 messages 2009/12/02

[#27025] [Backport #2431] StringIO#{gets,readlines} with "" (paragraph mode) trims last "\n" — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...>

Backport #2431: StringIO#{gets,readlines} with "" (paragraph mode) trims last "\n"

8 messages 2009/12/04

[#27086] [Feature #2454] OpenSSL has no maintainer — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

Feature #2454: OpenSSL has no maintainer

16 messages 2009/12/07

[#27120] #to_enum ignores block? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Is #to_enum ignoring its block expected?

11 messages 2009/12/09

[#27135] better GC? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Could I put in a small plea for a better GC?

56 messages 2009/12/10
[#27136] Re: better GC? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/12/11

Hi,

[#27476] Re: better GC? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2010/01/07

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:07:16AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#27477] Re: better GC? — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2010/01/07

Excerpts from Paul Brannan's message of Thu Jan 07 21:53:34 +0200 2010:

[#27563] Re: better GC? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2010/01/12

[#27199] [Backport #2488] thread usage can result in bad HANDLE — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Backport #2488: thread usage can result in bad HANDLE

12 messages 2009/12/16

[#27286] [Bug #2515] Array#select! — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #2515: Array#select!

17 messages 2009/12/22

[#27327] [Bug #2531] Ruby 1.8.7-p248 fails to cross-compile same version — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #2531: Ruby 1.8.7-p248 fails to cross-compile same version

9 messages 2009/12/25

[#27360] [Feature #2542] URI lib should be updated to RFC 39886 — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Feature #2542: URI lib should be updated to RFC 39886

15 messages 2009/12/31

[ruby-core:27134] Re: #to_enum ignores block?

From: Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>
Date: 2009-12-10 19:09:55 UTC
List: ruby-core #27134
> http://mamememo.blogspot.com/2009/11/enumerablerrb-enumerable-lazy-version.html
> http://d.hatena.ne.jp/ku-ma-me/20091111/p2 (in Japanese)

Excellent.  I was wondering where those lazy versions of select were...
As a note, though--I think it does use fibers if you do a #next call on one...

> Matz said that these methods are acceptable to be embedded into the
> core, but did not accept their names (selector, mapper, etc.).
> Instead, Matz suggested enum_select, enum_map, etc., but I dislike
> them because they are too verbose.

perhaps select_enum?

>ruby bench.rb
0.078125 # current select
0.515625 # selector

I think we should keep both, since it's such a slowdown (and having to
call #to_a everywhere might be a drag...) :)

> According to the commit log, it seemed to be "an undocumented feature",
> and was removed intentionally.

Ahh ok.
Thanks.
-r

In This Thread