[#27003] [Bug #2422] splat operator fails on array of 1 element — Raul Parolari <redmine@...>

Bug #2422: splat operator fails on array of 1 element

12 messages 2009/12/02

[#27025] [Backport #2431] StringIO#{gets,readlines} with "" (paragraph mode) trims last "\n" — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...>

Backport #2431: StringIO#{gets,readlines} with "" (paragraph mode) trims last "\n"

8 messages 2009/12/04

[#27086] [Feature #2454] OpenSSL has no maintainer — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

Feature #2454: OpenSSL has no maintainer

16 messages 2009/12/07

[#27120] #to_enum ignores block? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Is #to_enum ignoring its block expected?

11 messages 2009/12/09

[#27135] better GC? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Could I put in a small plea for a better GC?

56 messages 2009/12/10
[#27136] Re: better GC? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/12/11

Hi,

[#27476] Re: better GC? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2010/01/07

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:07:16AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#27477] Re: better GC? — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2010/01/07

Excerpts from Paul Brannan's message of Thu Jan 07 21:53:34 +0200 2010:

[#27563] Re: better GC? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2010/01/12

[#27199] [Backport #2488] thread usage can result in bad HANDLE — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Backport #2488: thread usage can result in bad HANDLE

12 messages 2009/12/16

[#27286] [Bug #2515] Array#select! — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #2515: Array#select!

17 messages 2009/12/22

[#27327] [Bug #2531] Ruby 1.8.7-p248 fails to cross-compile same version — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #2531: Ruby 1.8.7-p248 fails to cross-compile same version

9 messages 2009/12/25

[#27360] [Feature #2542] URI lib should be updated to RFC 39886 — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Feature #2542: URI lib should be updated to RFC 39886

15 messages 2009/12/31

[ruby-core:27248] Re: [Bug #2508] The {n} repetition notation issue in Regexp

From: "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Date: 2009-12-20 14:16:42 UTC
List: ruby-core #27248
Hi --

On Sun, 20 Dec 2009, katz bo wrote:

> Bug #2508: The {n} repetition notation issue in Regexp
> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2508
>
> Author: katz bo
> Status: Open, Priority: Normal
> Category: core
> ruby -v:  ruby 1.9.1p376 (2009-12-07 revision 26041) [i686-linux]
>
> There seems to be a bug in Ruby 1.9 regarding Regular Expression:
>
> /(io){1}x/ =~ 'ioiox' # => 2 #fine
> /(io){2}x/ =~ 'ioiox' # => nil #should be 0
> /(io){2,2}x/ =~ 'ioiox'# => nil #should be 0
> #below are correct
> /(?:io){2}x/ =~ 'ioiox' # => 0
> /(io){2}/ =~ 'ioiox' # => 0
> /(io){2,}x/ =~ 'ioiox' # => 0
> /(io){,2}x/ =~ 'ioiox' # => 0

I would call this a severe bug.


David

-- 
David A. Black
Senior Developer, Cyrus Innovation Inc.
THE COMPLEAT RUBYIST, Ruby training with Black/Brown/McAnally!
January 22-23, Tampa, Florida
Info and registration at http://www.thecompleatrubyist.com

In This Thread