[#27003] [Bug #2422] splat operator fails on array of 1 element — Raul Parolari <redmine@...>

Bug #2422: splat operator fails on array of 1 element

12 messages 2009/12/02

[#27025] [Backport #2431] StringIO#{gets,readlines} with "" (paragraph mode) trims last "\n" — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...>

Backport #2431: StringIO#{gets,readlines} with "" (paragraph mode) trims last "\n"

8 messages 2009/12/04

[#27086] [Feature #2454] OpenSSL has no maintainer — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

Feature #2454: OpenSSL has no maintainer

16 messages 2009/12/07

[#27120] #to_enum ignores block? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Is #to_enum ignoring its block expected?

11 messages 2009/12/09

[#27135] better GC? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Could I put in a small plea for a better GC?

56 messages 2009/12/10
[#27136] Re: better GC? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/12/11

Hi,

[#27476] Re: better GC? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2010/01/07

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:07:16AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#27477] Re: better GC? — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2010/01/07

Excerpts from Paul Brannan's message of Thu Jan 07 21:53:34 +0200 2010:

[#27563] Re: better GC? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2010/01/12

[#27199] [Backport #2488] thread usage can result in bad HANDLE — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Backport #2488: thread usage can result in bad HANDLE

12 messages 2009/12/16

[#27286] [Bug #2515] Array#select! — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #2515: Array#select!

17 messages 2009/12/22

[#27327] [Bug #2531] Ruby 1.8.7-p248 fails to cross-compile same version — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #2531: Ruby 1.8.7-p248 fails to cross-compile same version

9 messages 2009/12/25

[#27360] [Feature #2542] URI lib should be updated to RFC 39886 — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Feature #2542: URI lib should be updated to RFC 39886

15 messages 2009/12/31

[ruby-core:26982] Re: [Bug #2418] method_missing (assignment) returns args instead of return value

From: Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>
Date: 2009-12-01 19:49:44 UTC
List: ruby-core #26982
Any method ending in =3D ignores the result and returns the right-side.

//Magnus Holm



On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 20:41, Dave B <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> Bug #2418: method_missing (assignment) returns args instead of return val=
ue
> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2418
>
> Author: Dave B
> Status: Open, Priority: Low
> Category: core
> ruby -v: ruby 1.8.6 (2008-08-11 patchlevel 287) [i386-mswin32]
>
> 'missing_meth =3D value' returns 'value' from method_missing
> even though I return 999.
>
> If this is intentional, I can't understand why from the docs.
>
> Occurs on 1.8.6 -> 1.9.2 + JRuby + others?
>
> class Roo
> =C2=A0def method_missing(meth, *args)
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0puts 'method missing for %p %p' % [meth, args]
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0999
> =C2=A0end
> end
>
> r =3D Roo.new
> p =C2=A0r.roo
> p =C2=A0r.roo =3D 42
> p =C2=A0r.roo
>
> =3Dbegin (output)
>
> method missing for :roo []
> 999
> method missing for :roo=3D [42]
> 42
> method missing for :roo []
> 999
>
> =3Dend
>
>
> daz
>
>
> ----------------------------------------
> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org
>
>

In This Thread