[#26972] How to — HackerGene <hackergene@...>
Hi , I'm new to ruby programming language located in China.
[#26981] [Bug #2418] method_missing (assignment) returns args instead of return value — Dave B <redmine@...>
Bug #2418: method_missing (assignment) returns args instead of return value
[#27003] [Bug #2422] splat operator fails on array of 1 element — Raul Parolari <redmine@...>
Bug #2422: splat operator fails on array of 1 element
[#27014] possible bug in Method#source_location — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>
It appears that Method#source_location returns different values for
[#27025] [Backport #2431] StringIO#{gets,readlines} with "" (paragraph mode) trims last "\n" — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...>
Backport #2431: StringIO#{gets,readlines} with "" (paragraph mode) trims last "\n"
Issue #2431 has been updated by Vladimir Sizikov.
2009/12/7 Vladimir Sizikov <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
Hi,
Hi Vladimir,
[#27031] [Bug #2433] Ruby gem update --system /gem install [any_gem_name] ERROR — Sergueï Cambour <redmine@...>
Bug #2433: Ruby gem update --system /gem install [any_gem_name] ERROR
[#27036] Ruby causes nearly as much cpu wakeups as firefox — Christoph Kappel <unexist@...>
> =A020.5% (133.5) =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 firefox : hrtimer_start_range_ns (hr=
>> =A020.5% (133.5) =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 firefox : hrtimer_start_range_ns (h=
Hi,
[#27060] [Bug #2443] {Object,BasicObject}.clone — Shugo Maeda <redmine@...>
Bug #2443: {Object,BasicObject}.clone
[#27074] [Bug #2449] StringIO#ungetc behavior is contrary to its spec — Vladimir Sizikov <redmine@...>
Bug #2449: StringIO#ungetc behavior is contrary to its spec
Issue #2449 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
Hi,
[#27086] [Feature #2454] OpenSSL has no maintainer — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>
Feature #2454: OpenSSL has no maintainer
Issue #2454 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#27103] [Bug #2464] cross-compile Ruby patchlevel 376 fails — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>
Bug #2464: cross-compile Ruby patchlevel 376 fails
[#27120] #to_enum ignores block? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>
Is #to_enum ignoring its block expected?
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Roger Pack <rogerdpack@gmail.com> wrote:
> The whole purpose of to_enum is to return an Enumerator instance.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Roger Pack <rogerdpack@gmail.com> wrote:
[#27135] better GC? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>
Could I put in a small plea for a better GC?
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:07:16AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Excerpts from Paul Brannan's message of Thu Jan 07 21:53:34 +0200 2010:
Eero Saynatkari wrote:
> Rubinius is also compatible with existing extensions*
Excerpts from rogerdpack2's message of Fri Jan 08 18:41:18 +0200 2010:
>> I wonder if its GC could be merged into MRI :)
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Evan Phoenix <evan@fallingsnow.net> wrote=
Paul Brannan wrote:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 07:37:40AM +0900, Kurt Stephens wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Brent Roman <brent@mbari.org> wrote:
> Toshio Endo and Kenjiro Taura adapted the Boehm conservative GC
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 15:06, Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@gmail.com> wrote:
[#27142] Ruby's GC — Gon軋lo Silva <goncalossilva@...>
Hi there,
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wr=
[#27151] [Bug #2475] InstructionSequence#to_a fails for duparray — Paul Brannan <redmine@...>
Bug #2475: InstructionSequence#to_a fails for duparray
[#27169] [Feature #2480] request to add GC::Profiler.time method — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Feature #2480: request to add GC::Profiler.time method
[#27189] [ANN] openssl-nonblock 0.2.1: moving towards compatibility with Ruby 1.9.2 — Tony Arcieri <tony@...>
openssl-nonblock is a gem which enables non-blocking support in Ruby's
[#27198] [PATCH] fix CGI::escape to work with blocks, avoid dollar variables — Gaston Ramos <ramos.gaston@...>
Hi Ruby-Core, I attach a path that solve this problem:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Gaston Ramos <ramos.gaston@gmail.com>wrote:
El Thu, 17 de Dec de 2009, a las 11:20:32AM +0900, NARUSE, Yui dijo:
(2009/12/17 21:16), Gaston Ramos wrote:
[#27199] [Backport #2488] thread usage can result in bad HANDLE — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Backport #2488: thread usage can result in bad HANDLE
Issue #2488 has been updated by _ wanabe.
[#27205] unable to send signal "EXIT" — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>
Is this expected? (all versions of ruby...)
Hello,
[#27223] [Bug #2495] Matrix: Vector#each2 should check its argument — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>
Bug #2495: Matrix: Vector#each2 should check its argument
[#27224] [Bug #2496] Delegate: #methods and #public_methods should return delegated methods too — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>
Bug #2496: Delegate: #methods and #public_methods should return delegated methods too
Issue #2496 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#27230] [Bug #2502] strange behavior of anonymous class inside a proc — caleb clausen <redmine@...>
Bug #2502: strange behavior of anonymous class inside a proc
[#27238] Why doesn't Array include Comparable? — Martin DeMello <martindemello@...>
Array already defines <=>, why not include Comparable as well?
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Martin DeMello <martindemello@gmail.com>wrote:
[#27242] select! — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>
Forwarded from ruby-talk:
Hi,
[#27244] [Bug #2505] Threads behave inconsistently across platforms. — Christian Höltje <redmine@...>
Bug #2505: Threads behave inconsistently across platforms.
[#27256] [Feature #2509] Recursive freezing? — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>
Feature #2509: Recursive freezing?
[#27270] rb_eql, rb_equal — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>
would it be more efficient to add an extra == in there for these
[#27275] [Bug #2511] irb exits unexpectedly windows — Vlad Why <redmine@...>
Bug #2511: irb exits unexpectedly windows
[#27286] [Bug #2515] Array#select! — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Bug #2515: Array#select!
Issue #2515 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#27304] Ruby 1.8: Improved Rational performance by 10% — Kurt Stephens <ks@...>
http://kurtstephens.com/node/105
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Kurt Stephens <ks@kurtstephens.com> wrote:
[#27324] [Bug #2530] Future timestamps in 1.8.7-p248 generate recursive compilation process — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>
Bug #2530: Future timestamps in 1.8.7-p248 generate recursive compilation process
[#27360] [Feature #2542] URI lib should be updated to RFC 39886 — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>
Feature #2542: URI lib should be updated to RFC 39886
Issue #2542 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[ruby-core:27252] Re: [Bug #2505] Threads behave inconsistently across platforms.
Hi,
2009/12/21 Christian Holtje <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
> Issue #2505 has been updated by Christian Holtje.
>
>
>> > Some examples:
>> > priority doesn't do the same thing on Solaris than Linux.
>> > loop{} will lock the process up in Solaris, but not Linux.
>>
>> They may true. If a difference cause a practical problem, please report=
it.
>
> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/1169 - priority
It is duplicated not only in Solaris but also in Linux. It is
difficult to support thread priority. IMO, we should think that
Thread#priority=3D is already deprecated.
> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2359 - loop{}
Not duplicated.
> These are just two examples. Threading across platforms is very differen=
t. Heck, some platforms have multiple versions of threads.
You are right. Could you please report individually?
>> These two are wrong.
>> Ruby 1.9 uses native threads but still use GIL just because of the probl=
em you pointing out.
>
> I know that the GIL is still being used, but this still doesn't protect d=
ata-structures that aren't ready for native threads. A C extension can sti=
ll be thread-unsafe and fail in hard to understand and debug ways.
I cannot get your point. GIL locks not only code of Ruby but also
code of C extension. IWO, an execution of code in C extension is
not interrupted (unless you use BLOCKING_REGION or create new thread
explicitly). Even so, it can be thread-unsafe so easily?
> Having a new class that uses the native threads without the GIL everyplac=
e would have been a better solution than potentially breaking.
It might be something that is currently developped, called MVM.
> Or using something that is completely data safe, like using erlang style =
message passing with processes, would be even better and more platform inde=
pendent; C extensions wouldn't have to worry about being thread safe and lo=
cks wouldn't be needed for passing information around.
It is not Ruby :-(
--=20
Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp>