[#28395] [Bug #2830] Some methods raise ArgumentError instead of TypeError — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>
Bug #2830: Some methods raise ArgumentError instead of TypeError
[#28405] [Feature #2832] Vector#each and Enumerable — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>
Feature #2832: Vector#each and Enumerable
[#28452] Watched issues on redmine — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...>
Is there a page on redmine that will show me the list of issues that
[#28482] Question on scoped constant resolution Class vs Module — Peter McLain <peter.mclain@...>
I asked this on ruby-talk, but didn't get anywhere. Someone suggested
[#28505] [Bug #2838] Ruby 1.8.7 (2009-06-12 patchlevel 174) strange round behaviour — P K <redmine@...>
Bug #2838: Ruby 1.8.7 (2009-06-12 patchlevel 174) strange round behaviour
[#28552] [Bug #2945] Regexp#=== is failed by an exception when the exception is occurred in method_missing — Kenta Murata <redmine@...>
Bug #2945: Regexp#=== is failed by an exception when the exception is occurred in method_missing
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
[#28561] Ruby::DL vs Ruby::FFI — Aston <blackapache512-ticket@...>
Ruby.DL and FFI libraries are great for programmers like me who are not int=
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Aston <blackapache512-ticket@yahoo.com> wro=
(2010/03/09 1:04), Luis Lavena wrote:
[#28576] "rake not found" error on a rubygems test — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>
Hi Eric Hodel,
[#28583] build failure on 26861 using msys/mingw — Jon <jon.forums@...>
Can anyone replicate? I've recently updated both binutils and the mingw runtime so this may very well be my configuration.
[#28602] [Bug #2952] Time.strftime format %N — Russell Penney <redmine@...>
Bug #2952: Time.strftime format %N
[#28643] [Bug #2957] IO.print emits field separator after each object, rather than between — Daniel Kelley <redmine@...>
Bug #2957: IO.print emits field separator after each object, rather than between
[#28665] [ANN] 1.9.2 release plan — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>
Hi,
[#28686] trunk (26947) build fail with msys/mingw/vista — Jon <jon.forums@...>
I get the following build failure when msysgit's "c:\git\cmd" dir is on PATH.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:50 AM, Jon <jon.forums@gmail.com> wrote:
[#28712] When a trace hook raises an exception, should it terminate the program? — Rocky Bernstein <rockyb@...>
In Ruby 1.8 and the Ruby 1.9 trunk when running a trace hook that raises an
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Rocky Bernstein <rockyb@rubyforge.org> wro=
Let me clarify a bit because I think some of the facts (some by me) may hav=
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Rocky Bernstein <rockyb@rubyforge.org> wro=
[#28724] [Feature:trunk] Array#repeated_(permutation|combination) — "KISHIMOTO, Makoto" <ksmakoto@...4u.or.jp>
New methods Array#repeated_(permutation|combination).
[#28735] [Bug #2982] Ruby tries to link with both openssl and readline — Lucas Nussbaum <redmine@...>
Bug #2982: Ruby tries to link with both openssl and readline
Hi,
Issue #2982 has been updated by caleb clausen.
[#28783] [Feature #2065] An ancestors iterator — Simon Chiang <redmine@...>
Issue #2065 has been updated by Simon Chiang.
Hi,
[#28837] [Bug #2993] Module#instance_methods' flag seems to be ignored in singleton classes — Xavier Noria <redmine@...>
Bug #2993: Module#instance_methods' flag seems to be ignored in singleton classes
[#28859] st.c: pool allocator for tables and entries — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Hi all,
[#28865] Can DRb be used across a fork() — Chris Schlaeger <cschlaeger@...>
I'm trying to use DRb to communicate between a parent and child
[#28871] WeakRef extending Delegator is a bug waiting to happen? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
Hopefully this doesn't contradict my other email too much :)
[#28902] [Bug #2998] gets fails in mingw — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Bug #2998: gets fails in mingw
[#28907] [Bug #3000] Open SSL Segfaults — Christian Höltje <redmine@...>
Bug #3000: Open SSL Segfaults
Issue #3000 has been updated by Hiroshi NAKAMURA.
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
[#28924] [Bug #3005] Ruby core dump - [BUG] rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — Sebastian YEPES <redmine@...>
Bug #3005: Ruby core dump - [BUG] rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0
[#28954] [Feature #3010] slow require gems in ruby 1.9.1 — Miao Jiang <redmine@...>
Feature #3010: slow require gems in ruby 1.9.1
[#29019] [Bug #3015] NetBSD vs test/dl — Michael Graff <redmine@...>
Bug #3015: NetBSD vs test/dl
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:49:59AM +0900, Michael Graff wrote:
[#29031] [Feature #1395](Open) Steppable Kernel::eval — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...>
Issue #1395 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#29045] [Feature #3021] Array#product should accept a block. — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>
Feature #3021: Array#product should accept a block.
[#29092] merged psych to trunk — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
Hey everyone,
[#29118] [Bug #3051] psych is too osx-specifc — Michael Graff <redmine@...>
Bug #3051: psych is too osx-specifc
[#29128] [Bug #3052] DRb::start_service fails to detect used port — Chris Schlaeger <redmine@...>
Bug #3052: DRb::start_service fails to detect used port
Issue #3052 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#29131] [trunk:bug] Many rubygems tests fail with psych tests. — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
Many rubygems tests fail with psych tests.
(2010/03/30 17:55), Tanaka Akira wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 07:13:32PM +0900, NARUSE, Yui wrote:
[#29161] [Bug #3058] Inconsistent eol conversion of IO#read on Windows — Heesob Park <redmine@...>
Bug #3058: Inconsistent eol conversion of IO#read on Windows
[#29167] [Feature #3067] complex.c : Question: why Complex#~ is disabled? It's in the doc — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>
Feature #3067: complex.c : Question: why Complex#~ is disabled? It's in the doc
[#29179] [Bug #3071] Convert rubygems and rdoc to use psych — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>
Bug #3071: Convert rubygems and rdoc to use psych
Doesn't this mean the the RubyGems codevase would now be forked
Issue #3071 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#29186] [Bug #3072] Classes Inheriting from Data — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Bug #3072: Classes Inheriting from Data
[ruby-core:29023] Re: [Feature #2542] URI lib should be updated to RFC 3986
Hi, On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:35 AM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote: > 2010/3/25 "Martin J. D=FCrst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>: >> Is there a list of incompatibilities, or can you make one? > > Some structures of the syntax is changed in RFC 3986. > This breaks URI::REGEXP::PATTERN::TOPLABEL and some constants. I would recommend isolating these obsolete constants in a separate file which would, if autoloaded issue a warning that they are obsolete. If an option :TOPLABEL or similar is detected in the constructor of Parser, it would be ignored and a warning would be issued. Maybe someone can explain to me under which circumstances someone would want to use a these Regex or a different parser than the one corresponding to the RFC? Are there any example of actual usage of these? In any case, does the desire to support these Regex/constants that have been obsolete for 5 years supercede the need for the library to parse URIs properly? Are there other incompatibilities?