[#28561] Ruby::DL vs Ruby::FFI — Aston <blackapache512-ticket@...>

Ruby.DL and FFI libraries are great for programmers like me who are not internet programmers, but are more interested in scientific and number processing etc.

11 messages 2010/03/08

[#28686] trunk (26947) build fail with msys/mingw/vista — Jon <jon.forums@...>

I get the following build failure when msysgit's "c:\git\cmd" dir is on PATH.

8 messages 2010/03/16

[#28687] [Bug #2973] rb_bug - Segmentation fault - error.c:213 — rudolf gavlas <redmine@...>

Bug #2973: rb_bug - Segmentation fault - error.c:213

10 messages 2010/03/16

[#28735] [Bug #2982] Ruby tries to link with both openssl and readline — Lucas Nussbaum <redmine@...>

Bug #2982: Ruby tries to link with both openssl and readline

16 messages 2010/03/18

[#28736] [Bug #2983] Ruby (GPLv2 only) tries to link to with readline (now GPLv3) — Lucas Nussbaum <redmine@...>

Bug #2983: Ruby (GPLv2 only) tries to link to with readline (now GPLv3)

10 messages 2010/03/18

[#28907] [Bug #3000] Open SSL Segfaults — Christian Höltje <redmine@...>

Bug #3000: Open SSL Segfaults

19 messages 2010/03/23

[#28924] [Bug #3005] Ruby core dump - [BUG] rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — Sebastian YEPES <redmine@...>

Bug #3005: Ruby core dump - [BUG] rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0

10 messages 2010/03/24

[#28954] [Feature #3010] slow require gems in ruby 1.9.1 — Miao Jiang <redmine@...>

Feature #3010: slow require gems in ruby 1.9.1

15 messages 2010/03/24

[#29179] [Bug #3071] Convert rubygems and rdoc to use psych — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>

Bug #3071: Convert rubygems and rdoc to use psych

10 messages 2010/03/31

[ruby-core:28798] Re: [Feature #2065] An ancestors iterator

From: Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>
Date: 2010-03-19 16:50:43 UTC
List: ruby-core #28798
2010/3/20 Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se>:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 17:40, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 16:45, Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:
>>> I'd like to make up for my stupid suggestion by giving a patch :-)
>>> I can commit this if matz approves.
>
>> If I understood everything so far, we池e talking about 0.05.07
>> seconds per 100 000 calls. n what piece of code is that a
>> bottleneck?

I also want to know.


> I also wonder how much having that extra method slows down method
> lookup overall.

:-)

-- 
Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp>

In This Thread