From: Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>
Date: 2010-03-11T11:32:37+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:28600] Re: Question on scoped constant resolution 	Class vs Module

Hi,

Sorry for the delay.
I missed this thread.

2010/3/7 Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp>:
>> 4: Is the draft ruby spec correct, or MRI behavior correct, or did I miss
>> something in the following:
>
> Good point. �I bet the draft is wrong.

I agree with you, and will fix the draft.
Is it enough to fix 11.4.3.2 c)-3) as follows?

i) Let L be the included module list of C. Search each element of L in
the reverse order for a binding of a constant with name N.
ii) If the binding is found, the value of the
scoped-constant-reference is the value of the binding.
iii) Otherwise, if C is an instance of the class Class, search for a
binding of a constant with name N from Step e of �11.4.3.1.
iv) Otherwise, create a direct instance of the class Symbol with name
N, and let R be that instance. Invoke the method const_missing on C
with R as the only argument.

-- 
Shugo Maeda