[#28561] Ruby::DL vs Ruby::FFI — Aston <blackapache512-ticket@...>

Ruby.DL and FFI libraries are great for programmers like me who are not internet programmers, but are more interested in scientific and number processing etc.

11 messages 2010/03/08

[#28686] trunk (26947) build fail with msys/mingw/vista — Jon <jon.forums@...>

I get the following build failure when msysgit's "c:\git\cmd" dir is on PATH.

8 messages 2010/03/16

[#28687] [Bug #2973] rb_bug - Segmentation fault - error.c:213 — rudolf gavlas <redmine@...>

Bug #2973: rb_bug - Segmentation fault - error.c:213

10 messages 2010/03/16

[#28735] [Bug #2982] Ruby tries to link with both openssl and readline — Lucas Nussbaum <redmine@...>

Bug #2982: Ruby tries to link with both openssl and readline

16 messages 2010/03/18

[#28736] [Bug #2983] Ruby (GPLv2 only) tries to link to with readline (now GPLv3) — Lucas Nussbaum <redmine@...>

Bug #2983: Ruby (GPLv2 only) tries to link to with readline (now GPLv3)

10 messages 2010/03/18

[#28907] [Bug #3000] Open SSL Segfaults — Christian Höltje <redmine@...>

Bug #3000: Open SSL Segfaults

19 messages 2010/03/23

[#28924] [Bug #3005] Ruby core dump - [BUG] rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — Sebastian YEPES <redmine@...>

Bug #3005: Ruby core dump - [BUG] rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0

10 messages 2010/03/24

[#28954] [Feature #3010] slow require gems in ruby 1.9.1 — Miao Jiang <redmine@...>

Feature #3010: slow require gems in ruby 1.9.1

15 messages 2010/03/24

[#29179] [Bug #3071] Convert rubygems and rdoc to use psych — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>

Bug #3071: Convert rubygems and rdoc to use psych

10 messages 2010/03/31

[ruby-core:29084] Re: [Bug #3000] Open SSL Segfaults

From: Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>
Date: 2010-03-28 12:24:21 UTC
List: ruby-core #29084
Hi,

2010/3/28 NAKAMURA, Hiroshi <nakahiro@gmail.com>:
> There's a ticket that the cause is
> not fully identified yet but someone closed the ticket with a applying
> a workaround patch while I was digging into it by asking the reporter.


Aha, I understand what you mean.


There was certainly a bug at hand.  And I thought the patch worked
out the bug in the short term.  So I committed it and closed this
ticket.

Indeed, the patch may be formally wrong.  The patch might be poking
undocumented feature or bug of openssl.  As you said, ruby-openssl
might need major revamping including its design.


However, such document investigation and major revamping take cost.
Because there is no maintainer for ruby-openssl, we can't help but
do superficial fix, unfortunately.

Hiroshi, please think about becoming maintainer for openssl.  It
will make everybody happy :-)

-- 
Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp>

In This Thread