[#28561] Ruby::DL vs Ruby::FFI — Aston <blackapache512-ticket@...>

Ruby.DL and FFI libraries are great for programmers like me who are not internet programmers, but are more interested in scientific and number processing etc.

11 messages 2010/03/08

[#28686] trunk (26947) build fail with msys/mingw/vista — Jon <jon.forums@...>

I get the following build failure when msysgit's "c:\git\cmd" dir is on PATH.

8 messages 2010/03/16

[#28687] [Bug #2973] rb_bug - Segmentation fault - error.c:213 — rudolf gavlas <redmine@...>

Bug #2973: rb_bug - Segmentation fault - error.c:213

10 messages 2010/03/16

[#28735] [Bug #2982] Ruby tries to link with both openssl and readline — Lucas Nussbaum <redmine@...>

Bug #2982: Ruby tries to link with both openssl and readline

16 messages 2010/03/18

[#28736] [Bug #2983] Ruby (GPLv2 only) tries to link to with readline (now GPLv3) — Lucas Nussbaum <redmine@...>

Bug #2983: Ruby (GPLv2 only) tries to link to with readline (now GPLv3)

10 messages 2010/03/18

[#28907] [Bug #3000] Open SSL Segfaults — Christian Höltje <redmine@...>

Bug #3000: Open SSL Segfaults

19 messages 2010/03/23

[#28924] [Bug #3005] Ruby core dump - [BUG] rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — Sebastian YEPES <redmine@...>

Bug #3005: Ruby core dump - [BUG] rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0

10 messages 2010/03/24

[#28954] [Feature #3010] slow require gems in ruby 1.9.1 — Miao Jiang <redmine@...>

Feature #3010: slow require gems in ruby 1.9.1

15 messages 2010/03/24

[#29179] [Bug #3071] Convert rubygems and rdoc to use psych — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>

Bug #3071: Convert rubygems and rdoc to use psych

10 messages 2010/03/31

[ruby-core:29105] Re: [Bug #3000] Open SSL Segfaults

From: Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>
Date: 2010-03-29 13:15:34 UTC
List: ruby-core #29105
Hi,

2010/3/29 NAKAMURA, Hiroshi <nakahiro@gmail.com>:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 21:24, Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:
>> However, such document investigation and major revamping take cost.
>> Because there is no maintainer for ruby-openssl, we can't help but
>> do superficial fix, unfortunately.
>
> The problem, for me, was closing the ticket without giving a time to
> identify the cost for fix.

Time will not solve a concern unless there is a person who
considers the concern, I think.


>> Hiroshi, please think about becoming maintainer for openssl. ?It
>> will make everybody happy :-)
>
> Becoming a maintainer fixes the 'closing ticket too soon' problem?

I think so.  If you are a maintainer, the ticket can be left
open with assigning to you.  A release manager can ask you
the current status, and can encourage you to address/update
tickets assigned to you :-)


Okay, now I can verbalize more precisely what I really hate.
I hate open and NOT ASSIGNED tickets.  They should be clarifed
where their responsibility lies.  If there is no one who has
responsibility, it is unfortune but unavoidable to close
such tickets as WONTFIX.

-- 
Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp>

In This Thread