[#28561] Ruby::DL vs Ruby::FFI — Aston <blackapache512-ticket@...>

Ruby.DL and FFI libraries are great for programmers like me who are not internet programmers, but are more interested in scientific and number processing etc.

11 messages 2010/03/08

[#28686] trunk (26947) build fail with msys/mingw/vista — Jon <jon.forums@...>

I get the following build failure when msysgit's "c:\git\cmd" dir is on PATH.

8 messages 2010/03/16

[#28687] [Bug #2973] rb_bug - Segmentation fault - error.c:213 — rudolf gavlas <redmine@...>

Bug #2973: rb_bug - Segmentation fault - error.c:213

10 messages 2010/03/16

[#28735] [Bug #2982] Ruby tries to link with both openssl and readline — Lucas Nussbaum <redmine@...>

Bug #2982: Ruby tries to link with both openssl and readline

16 messages 2010/03/18

[#28736] [Bug #2983] Ruby (GPLv2 only) tries to link to with readline (now GPLv3) — Lucas Nussbaum <redmine@...>

Bug #2983: Ruby (GPLv2 only) tries to link to with readline (now GPLv3)

10 messages 2010/03/18

[#28907] [Bug #3000] Open SSL Segfaults — Christian Höltje <redmine@...>

Bug #3000: Open SSL Segfaults

19 messages 2010/03/23

[#28924] [Bug #3005] Ruby core dump - [BUG] rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — Sebastian YEPES <redmine@...>

Bug #3005: Ruby core dump - [BUG] rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0

10 messages 2010/03/24

[#28954] [Feature #3010] slow require gems in ruby 1.9.1 — Miao Jiang <redmine@...>

Feature #3010: slow require gems in ruby 1.9.1

15 messages 2010/03/24

[#29179] [Bug #3071] Convert rubygems and rdoc to use psych — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>

Bug #3071: Convert rubygems and rdoc to use psych

10 messages 2010/03/31

[ruby-core:29164] Re: [Feature #3021] Array#product should accept a block.

From: Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>
Date: 2010-03-31 13:50:48 UTC
List: ruby-core #29164
Hi,

2010/3/31 Yusuke Endoh <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
> 2010/3/27 Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
>> Array#permutation and #combination will yield to the given block, or else return an enumerator.
>>
>> I believe Array#product should have been designed the same way.
>>
>> Returning an enumerator today would break compatibility though.
>>
>> I suggest that Array#product(&block) yields to the block and returns self. This maintains compatibility while making it possible to produce an enumerable with my_array.to_enum(:product, ...) or to avoid building an intermediate array.
>
>
> Agreed!
>
> In fact, I suggested the similar change to let Array#product
> return an Enumerator. ?[ruby-dev:39277]
>
> Of course, it has a compatibility problem, and matz himself
> suggested exactly the same change as you. ?[ruby-dev:39306]


Matz agreed with this feature in [ruby-dev:40867].  Thanks!

-- 
Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp>

In This Thread