[#28561] Ruby::DL vs Ruby::FFI — Aston <blackapache512-ticket@...>

Ruby.DL and FFI libraries are great for programmers like me who are not internet programmers, but are more interested in scientific and number processing etc.

11 messages 2010/03/08

[#28686] trunk (26947) build fail with msys/mingw/vista — Jon <jon.forums@...>

I get the following build failure when msysgit's "c:\git\cmd" dir is on PATH.

8 messages 2010/03/16

[#28687] [Bug #2973] rb_bug - Segmentation fault - error.c:213 — rudolf gavlas <redmine@...>

Bug #2973: rb_bug - Segmentation fault - error.c:213

10 messages 2010/03/16

[#28735] [Bug #2982] Ruby tries to link with both openssl and readline — Lucas Nussbaum <redmine@...>

Bug #2982: Ruby tries to link with both openssl and readline

16 messages 2010/03/18

[#28736] [Bug #2983] Ruby (GPLv2 only) tries to link to with readline (now GPLv3) — Lucas Nussbaum <redmine@...>

Bug #2983: Ruby (GPLv2 only) tries to link to with readline (now GPLv3)

10 messages 2010/03/18

[#28907] [Bug #3000] Open SSL Segfaults — Christian Höltje <redmine@...>

Bug #3000: Open SSL Segfaults

19 messages 2010/03/23

[#28924] [Bug #3005] Ruby core dump - [BUG] rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — Sebastian YEPES <redmine@...>

Bug #3005: Ruby core dump - [BUG] rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0

10 messages 2010/03/24

[#28954] [Feature #3010] slow require gems in ruby 1.9.1 — Miao Jiang <redmine@...>

Feature #3010: slow require gems in ruby 1.9.1

15 messages 2010/03/24

[#29179] [Bug #3071] Convert rubygems and rdoc to use psych — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>

Bug #3071: Convert rubygems and rdoc to use psych

10 messages 2010/03/31

[ruby-core:29124] Re: [Bug #3000] Open SSL Segfaults

From: "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...>
Date: 2010-03-30 01:25:57 UTC
List: ruby-core #29124
Hi,

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 22:15, Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:
>> The problem, for me, was closing the ticket without giving a time to
>> identify the cost for fix.
>
> Time will not solve a concern unless there is a person who
> considers the concern, I think.

Even though I'd posted a question before closing? You don't allow
non-maintainer's contribution? I don't think you don't.

> Okay, now I can verbalize more precisely what I really hate.
> I hate open and NOT ASSIGNED tickets. hey should be clarifed
> where their responsibility lies. f there is no one who has
> responsibility, it is unfortune but unavoidable to close
> such tickets as WONTFIX.

I prefer to keep those tickets untouched or label 'Information Needed'
status.  Closing ticket too soon sometimes leads "Out of sight, out of
mind."  It's good to let issue tracker express the project status as
it is.

Regards,
// NaHi

In This Thread