[#27003] [Bug #2422] splat operator fails on array of 1 element — Raul Parolari <redmine@...>

Bug #2422: splat operator fails on array of 1 element

12 messages 2009/12/02

[#27025] [Backport #2431] StringIO#{gets,readlines} with "" (paragraph mode) trims last "\n" — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...>

Backport #2431: StringIO#{gets,readlines} with "" (paragraph mode) trims last "\n"

8 messages 2009/12/04

[#27086] [Feature #2454] OpenSSL has no maintainer — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

Feature #2454: OpenSSL has no maintainer

16 messages 2009/12/07

[#27120] #to_enum ignores block? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Is #to_enum ignoring its block expected?

11 messages 2009/12/09

[#27135] better GC? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Could I put in a small plea for a better GC?

56 messages 2009/12/10
[#27136] Re: better GC? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/12/11

Hi,

[#27476] Re: better GC? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2010/01/07

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:07:16AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#27477] Re: better GC? — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2010/01/07

Excerpts from Paul Brannan's message of Thu Jan 07 21:53:34 +0200 2010:

[#27563] Re: better GC? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2010/01/12

[#27199] [Backport #2488] thread usage can result in bad HANDLE — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Backport #2488: thread usage can result in bad HANDLE

12 messages 2009/12/16

[#27286] [Bug #2515] Array#select! — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #2515: Array#select!

17 messages 2009/12/22

[#27327] [Bug #2531] Ruby 1.8.7-p248 fails to cross-compile same version — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #2531: Ruby 1.8.7-p248 fails to cross-compile same version

9 messages 2009/12/25

[#27360] [Feature #2542] URI lib should be updated to RFC 39886 — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Feature #2542: URI lib should be updated to RFC 39886

15 messages 2009/12/31

[ruby-core:27325] Re: [Bug #2530] Future timestamps in 1.8.7-p248 generate recursive compilation process

From: Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
Date: 2009-12-25 16:52:37 UTC
List: ruby-core #27325
2009/12/26 Luis Lavena <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:

> After the announcement of 1.8.7-p248, I've proceeded to download and install it.
>
> During extraction, got several warnings about future timestamps, and ignore them (see attached extract.error.log)
>
> My local clock is 12pm, 2009-12-25, UTC-3

The first two line of extract.error.log is follows.

| [2009-12-16 14:33:29] tar xzf
/home/luis/.rvm/archives/ruby-1.8.7-p248.tar.gz -C /home/luis/.rvm/src
| tar: ruby-1.8.7-p248/bin: time stamp 2009-12-24 06:37:32 is
662642.859822642 s in the future

I guess your clock shows 2009-12-16.

% ruby -e 'p Time.local(2009,12,24,6,37,32) - 662642.859822642'
2009-12-16 14:33:29 +0900

I think Ruby 1.8.7 p248 is not released before 2009-12-16.
-- 
Tanaka Akira

In This Thread