[#27003] [Bug #2422] splat operator fails on array of 1 element — Raul Parolari <redmine@...>

Bug #2422: splat operator fails on array of 1 element

12 messages 2009/12/02

[#27025] [Backport #2431] StringIO#{gets,readlines} with "" (paragraph mode) trims last "\n" — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...>

Backport #2431: StringIO#{gets,readlines} with "" (paragraph mode) trims last "\n"

8 messages 2009/12/04

[#27086] [Feature #2454] OpenSSL has no maintainer — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

Feature #2454: OpenSSL has no maintainer

16 messages 2009/12/07

[#27120] #to_enum ignores block? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Is #to_enum ignoring its block expected?

11 messages 2009/12/09

[#27135] better GC? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Could I put in a small plea for a better GC?

56 messages 2009/12/10
[#27136] Re: better GC? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/12/11

Hi,

[#27476] Re: better GC? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2010/01/07

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:07:16AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#27477] Re: better GC? — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2010/01/07

Excerpts from Paul Brannan's message of Thu Jan 07 21:53:34 +0200 2010:

[#27563] Re: better GC? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2010/01/12

[#27199] [Backport #2488] thread usage can result in bad HANDLE — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Backport #2488: thread usage can result in bad HANDLE

12 messages 2009/12/16

[#27286] [Bug #2515] Array#select! — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #2515: Array#select!

17 messages 2009/12/22

[#27327] [Bug #2531] Ruby 1.8.7-p248 fails to cross-compile same version — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #2531: Ruby 1.8.7-p248 fails to cross-compile same version

9 messages 2009/12/25

[#27360] [Feature #2542] URI lib should be updated to RFC 39886 — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Feature #2542: URI lib should be updated to RFC 39886

15 messages 2009/12/31

[ruby-core:27327] [Bug #2531] Ruby 1.8.7-p248 fails to cross-compile same version

From: Luis Lavena <redmine@...>
Date: 2009-12-25 18:54:12 UTC
List: ruby-core #27327
Bug #2531: Ruby 1.8.7-p248 fails to cross-compile same version
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2531

Author: Luis Lavena
Status: Open, Priority: Normal
Category: build
ruby -v: ruby 1.8.7 (2009-12-24 patchlevel 248) [i686-linux]

Hello,

I was informed before in #2485 (backport) that same version and patchlevel is required to perform a cross-compilation targeting MinGW.

Using latest 1.8.7 as base, tried to cross-compile same patchlevel version, but it failed due missing ruby.h file:

<pre><code>
compiling dl
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/luis/.rake-compiler/builds/ruby-1.8.7-p248/ext/dl'
Generating callback.func
mkmf.rb can't find header files for ruby at /home/luis/.rvm/ruby-1.8.7-p248/lib/ruby/ruby.h
make[1]: *** [callback.func] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/luis/.rake-compiler/builds/ruby-1.8.7-p248/ext/dl'
make: *** [all] Error 1
</code></pre>

From what I see, seems mkmf is expecting the headers files in the wrong directory, as it needs to append the version (1.8) and the platform (i686-linux) to properly find them.

Find attached the config.status, config.log and rbconfig.rb generated.

My interest in the success of the cross compilation process is associated with rake-compiler project to allow Linux/OSX developers build and ship functional gems and projects for Windows users.

Thank you.


----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next