[#27003] [Bug #2422] splat operator fails on array of 1 element — Raul Parolari <redmine@...>

Bug #2422: splat operator fails on array of 1 element

12 messages 2009/12/02

[#27025] [Backport #2431] StringIO#{gets,readlines} with "" (paragraph mode) trims last "\n" — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...>

Backport #2431: StringIO#{gets,readlines} with "" (paragraph mode) trims last "\n"

8 messages 2009/12/04

[#27086] [Feature #2454] OpenSSL has no maintainer — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

Feature #2454: OpenSSL has no maintainer

16 messages 2009/12/07

[#27120] #to_enum ignores block? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Is #to_enum ignoring its block expected?

11 messages 2009/12/09

[#27135] better GC? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Could I put in a small plea for a better GC?

56 messages 2009/12/10
[#27136] Re: better GC? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/12/11

Hi,

[#27476] Re: better GC? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2010/01/07

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:07:16AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#27477] Re: better GC? — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2010/01/07

Excerpts from Paul Brannan's message of Thu Jan 07 21:53:34 +0200 2010:

[#27563] Re: better GC? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2010/01/12

[#27199] [Backport #2488] thread usage can result in bad HANDLE — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Backport #2488: thread usage can result in bad HANDLE

12 messages 2009/12/16

[#27286] [Bug #2515] Array#select! — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #2515: Array#select!

17 messages 2009/12/22

[#27327] [Bug #2531] Ruby 1.8.7-p248 fails to cross-compile same version — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #2531: Ruby 1.8.7-p248 fails to cross-compile same version

9 messages 2009/12/25

[#27360] [Feature #2542] URI lib should be updated to RFC 39886 — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Feature #2542: URI lib should be updated to RFC 39886

15 messages 2009/12/31

[ruby-core:27168] Re: [Bug #2475] InstructionSequence#to_a fails for duparray

From: Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>
Date: 2009-12-14 17:43:56 UTC
List: ruby-core #27168
> This is already fixed in p376, isn't it?


C:\dev\digitalarchive_trunk>ruby -v
ruby 1.9.1p376 (2009-12-07 revision 26041) [i386-mingw32]

C:\dev\digitalarchive_trunk>irb
>> i = RubyVM::InstructionSequence.compile("a = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; foo(a)")
>> i.to_a
NotImplementedError: method `inspect' called on terminated object (0x157cd20)
        from C:/installs/ruby19_mingw/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb.rb:310:in `inspect'
        from C:/installs/ruby19_mingw/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb.rb:310:in `inspect'
        from C:/installs/ruby19_mingw/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb.rb:310:in `inspect'
        from C:/installs/ruby19_mingw/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb.rb:310:in
`output_value'
        from C:/installs/ruby19_mingw/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb.rb:158:in
`block (2 levels) in eval_input'
        from C:/installs/ruby19_mingw/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb.rb:271:in
`signal_status'
        from C:/installs/ruby19_mingw/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb.rb:154:in
`block in eval_input'
        from C:/installs/ruby19_mingw/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb/ruby-lex.rb:244:in
`block (2 levels) in each_top_level_statement'
        from C:/installs/ruby19_mingw/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb/ruby-lex.rb:230:in
`loop'
        from C:/installs/ruby19_mingw/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb/ruby-lex.rb:230:in
`block in each_top_level_statement'
        from C:/installs/ruby19_mingw/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb/ruby-lex.rb:229:in
`catch'
        from C:/installs/ruby19_mingw/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb/ruby-lex.rb:229:in
`each_top_level_statement'
        from C:/installs/ruby19_mingw/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb.rb:153:in `eval_input'
        from C:/installs/ruby19_mingw/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb.rb:70:in
`block in start'
        from C:/installs/ruby19_mingw/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb.rb:69:in `catch'
        from C:/installs/ruby19_mingw/lib/ruby/1.9.1/irb.rb:69:in `start'
        from C:/installs/ruby19_mingw/bin/irb:12:in `<main>'Maybe IRB bug!!

In This Thread