[#27003] [Bug #2422] splat operator fails on array of 1 element — Raul Parolari <redmine@...>

Bug #2422: splat operator fails on array of 1 element

12 messages 2009/12/02

[#27025] [Backport #2431] StringIO#{gets,readlines} with "" (paragraph mode) trims last "\n" — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...>

Backport #2431: StringIO#{gets,readlines} with "" (paragraph mode) trims last "\n"

8 messages 2009/12/04

[#27086] [Feature #2454] OpenSSL has no maintainer — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

Feature #2454: OpenSSL has no maintainer

16 messages 2009/12/07

[#27120] #to_enum ignores block? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Is #to_enum ignoring its block expected?

11 messages 2009/12/09

[#27135] better GC? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Could I put in a small plea for a better GC?

56 messages 2009/12/10
[#27136] Re: better GC? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/12/11

Hi,

[#27476] Re: better GC? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2010/01/07

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:07:16AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#27477] Re: better GC? — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2010/01/07

Excerpts from Paul Brannan's message of Thu Jan 07 21:53:34 +0200 2010:

[#27563] Re: better GC? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2010/01/12

[#27199] [Backport #2488] thread usage can result in bad HANDLE — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Backport #2488: thread usage can result in bad HANDLE

12 messages 2009/12/16

[#27286] [Bug #2515] Array#select! — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #2515: Array#select!

17 messages 2009/12/22

[#27327] [Bug #2531] Ruby 1.8.7-p248 fails to cross-compile same version — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #2531: Ruby 1.8.7-p248 fails to cross-compile same version

9 messages 2009/12/25

[#27360] [Feature #2542] URI lib should be updated to RFC 39886 — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Feature #2542: URI lib should be updated to RFC 39886

15 messages 2009/12/31

[ruby-core:27177] [Bug #2484] Neither 1.8.6 or 1.8.7 can serve as base ruby for cross compilation

From: Luis Lavena <redmine@...>
Date: 2009-12-15 12:30:51 UTC
List: ruby-core #27177
Bug #2484: Neither 1.8.6 or 1.8.7 can serve as base ruby for cross compilation
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/2484

Author: Luis Lavena
Status: Open, Priority: Normal
Category: build
ruby -v: ruby 1.8.7 (2009-06-12 patchlevel 174) [i386-darwin9.8.0]

I've originally reported a similar issue in #2464, but was rejected.

He stated the following:

"You seem to use Ruby 1.8.6 for bulding Ruby 1.9.1.
But Ruby 1.9's lib/mkmf.rb can't run with Ruby 1.8.6."

Which in the past worked but randomly failed between patchelevels.

Today, tried to use 1.8.7 as suggested, with a different failure this time:

<pre><code>
compiling bigdecimal
/Users/luis/.rvm/ruby-1.8.7-p174/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:1436:in `dup': can't dup NilClass (TypeError)
	from /Users/luis/.rvm/ruby-1.8.7-p174/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:1436:in `fu_check_options'
	from /Users/luis/.rvm/ruby-1.8.7-p174/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:568:in `rm_f'
	from /Users/luis/.rake-compiler/sources/ruby-1.9.1-p376/lib/mkmf.rb:195:in `rm_f'
	from /Users/luis/.rake-compiler/sources/ruby-1.9.1-p376/ext/extmk.rb:161:in `extmake'
	from /Users/luis/.rake-compiler/sources/ruby-1.9.1-p376/ext/extmk.rb:440
	from /Users/luis/.rake-compiler/sources/ruby-1.9.1-p376/ext/extmk.rb:436:in `each'
	from /Users/luis/.rake-compiler/sources/ruby-1.9.1-p376/ext/extmk.rb:436
make: *** [mkmain.sh] Error 1
</code></pre>

I've also tried to compile 1.9.2dev using 1.8.6, all without issues. So the problem remains in 1.9.1 branch.

Looking at 1.9.1 branch, I don't see any documentation or indication of exact Ruby version required to compile it.


----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next