[#27003] [Bug #2422] splat operator fails on array of 1 element — Raul Parolari <redmine@...>

Bug #2422: splat operator fails on array of 1 element

12 messages 2009/12/02

[#27025] [Backport #2431] StringIO#{gets,readlines} with "" (paragraph mode) trims last "\n" — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...>

Backport #2431: StringIO#{gets,readlines} with "" (paragraph mode) trims last "\n"

8 messages 2009/12/04

[#27086] [Feature #2454] OpenSSL has no maintainer — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

Feature #2454: OpenSSL has no maintainer

16 messages 2009/12/07

[#27120] #to_enum ignores block? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Is #to_enum ignoring its block expected?

11 messages 2009/12/09

[#27135] better GC? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Could I put in a small plea for a better GC?

56 messages 2009/12/10
[#27136] Re: better GC? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/12/11

Hi,

[#27476] Re: better GC? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2010/01/07

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:07:16AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#27477] Re: better GC? — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2010/01/07

Excerpts from Paul Brannan's message of Thu Jan 07 21:53:34 +0200 2010:

[#27563] Re: better GC? — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2010/01/12

[#27199] [Backport #2488] thread usage can result in bad HANDLE — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Backport #2488: thread usage can result in bad HANDLE

12 messages 2009/12/16

[#27286] [Bug #2515] Array#select! — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #2515: Array#select!

17 messages 2009/12/22

[#27327] [Bug #2531] Ruby 1.8.7-p248 fails to cross-compile same version — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #2531: Ruby 1.8.7-p248 fails to cross-compile same version

9 messages 2009/12/25

[#27360] [Feature #2542] URI lib should be updated to RFC 39886 — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

Feature #2542: URI lib should be updated to RFC 39886

15 messages 2009/12/31

[ruby-core:26969] [ANN] Ruby draft specification

From: Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>
Date: 2009-12-01 07:07:24 UTC
List: ruby-core #26969
Hello,

The first version of the draft specification of Ruby has been released
at the following site.

  http://ruby-std.netlab.jp/

The following is a messsage from Ikuo Nakata, who is the chairman of
the IPA Ruby Standardization WG.

----
Dear Sirs and Madams;

With its excellent descriptiveness, the Ruby language attracts many
programmers, especially in the Web application construction
area. However, the specification of Ruby language has not been
standardized yet.

For wider and more application of Ruby language, "Ruby Standardization
Working Group" has been established under Information-technology
Promotion Agency, Japan (IPA) to define the specification of Ruby
language on Oct. 2008. Since then the WG has been drafting the
specification of Ruby language.

As the first draft of Ruby language specification has just recently
completed, we'd like to request users and developers of Ruby
communities to review it.

By gathering review comments widely from you, we are going to improve
the draft of Ruby language specification further. Then we will propose
the improved draft to Japanese Industrial Standards Committee (JISC)
to be JIS. After JIS for Ruby has been published, we will propose it
to International Standardization Organization (ISO/IEC JTC1) to be
International Standard.

We are looking forward to obtaining many comments from you and to
having active discussion among you and ourselves.

Please send comments by January 12, 2010. We'd like to reflect them in
the draft specification as much as possible before applying
standardization process.

IPA Ruby Standardization WG
Chairman
Ikuo NAKATA
----

For further information, please visit http://ruby-std.netlab.jp/.
The site is provided by the Network Applied Communication Laboratory,
to which IPA has entrusted the drafting of the specification.

-- 
Shugo Maeda <shugo@netlab.jp>

In This Thread

Prev Next