[#26972] How to — HackerGene <hackergene@...>
Hi , I'm new to ruby programming language located in China.
[#26981] [Bug #2418] method_missing (assignment) returns args instead of return value — Dave B <redmine@...>
Bug #2418: method_missing (assignment) returns args instead of return value
[#27003] [Bug #2422] splat operator fails on array of 1 element — Raul Parolari <redmine@...>
Bug #2422: splat operator fails on array of 1 element
[#27014] possible bug in Method#source_location — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>
It appears that Method#source_location returns different values for
[#27025] [Backport #2431] StringIO#{gets,readlines} with "" (paragraph mode) trims last "\n" — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...>
Backport #2431: StringIO#{gets,readlines} with "" (paragraph mode) trims last "\n"
Issue #2431 has been updated by Vladimir Sizikov.
2009/12/7 Vladimir Sizikov <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
Hi,
Hi Vladimir,
[#27031] [Bug #2433] Ruby gem update --system /gem install [any_gem_name] ERROR — Sergueï Cambour <redmine@...>
Bug #2433: Ruby gem update --system /gem install [any_gem_name] ERROR
[#27036] Ruby causes nearly as much cpu wakeups as firefox — Christoph Kappel <unexist@...>
> =A020.5% (133.5) =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 firefox : hrtimer_start_range_ns (hr=
>> =A020.5% (133.5) =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 firefox : hrtimer_start_range_ns (h=
Hi,
[#27060] [Bug #2443] {Object,BasicObject}.clone — Shugo Maeda <redmine@...>
Bug #2443: {Object,BasicObject}.clone
[#27074] [Bug #2449] StringIO#ungetc behavior is contrary to its spec — Vladimir Sizikov <redmine@...>
Bug #2449: StringIO#ungetc behavior is contrary to its spec
Issue #2449 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
Hi,
[#27086] [Feature #2454] OpenSSL has no maintainer — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>
Feature #2454: OpenSSL has no maintainer
Issue #2454 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#27103] [Bug #2464] cross-compile Ruby patchlevel 376 fails — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>
Bug #2464: cross-compile Ruby patchlevel 376 fails
[#27120] #to_enum ignores block? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>
Is #to_enum ignoring its block expected?
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Roger Pack <rogerdpack@gmail.com> wrote:
> The whole purpose of to_enum is to return an Enumerator instance.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Roger Pack <rogerdpack@gmail.com> wrote:
[#27135] better GC? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>
Could I put in a small plea for a better GC?
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:07:16AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Excerpts from Paul Brannan's message of Thu Jan 07 21:53:34 +0200 2010:
Eero Saynatkari wrote:
> Rubinius is also compatible with existing extensions*
Excerpts from rogerdpack2's message of Fri Jan 08 18:41:18 +0200 2010:
>> I wonder if its GC could be merged into MRI :)
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Evan Phoenix <evan@fallingsnow.net> wrote=
Paul Brannan wrote:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 07:37:40AM +0900, Kurt Stephens wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Brent Roman <brent@mbari.org> wrote:
> Toshio Endo and Kenjiro Taura adapted the Boehm conservative GC
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 15:06, Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@gmail.com> wrote:
[#27142] Ruby's GC — Gon軋lo Silva <goncalossilva@...>
Hi there,
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wr=
[#27151] [Bug #2475] InstructionSequence#to_a fails for duparray — Paul Brannan <redmine@...>
Bug #2475: InstructionSequence#to_a fails for duparray
[#27169] [Feature #2480] request to add GC::Profiler.time method — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Feature #2480: request to add GC::Profiler.time method
[#27189] [ANN] openssl-nonblock 0.2.1: moving towards compatibility with Ruby 1.9.2 — Tony Arcieri <tony@...>
openssl-nonblock is a gem which enables non-blocking support in Ruby's
[#27198] [PATCH] fix CGI::escape to work with blocks, avoid dollar variables — Gaston Ramos <ramos.gaston@...>
Hi Ruby-Core, I attach a path that solve this problem:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Gaston Ramos <ramos.gaston@gmail.com>wrote:
El Thu, 17 de Dec de 2009, a las 11:20:32AM +0900, NARUSE, Yui dijo:
(2009/12/17 21:16), Gaston Ramos wrote:
[#27199] [Backport #2488] thread usage can result in bad HANDLE — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Backport #2488: thread usage can result in bad HANDLE
Issue #2488 has been updated by _ wanabe.
[#27205] unable to send signal "EXIT" — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>
Is this expected? (all versions of ruby...)
Hello,
[#27223] [Bug #2495] Matrix: Vector#each2 should check its argument — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>
Bug #2495: Matrix: Vector#each2 should check its argument
[#27224] [Bug #2496] Delegate: #methods and #public_methods should return delegated methods too — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>
Bug #2496: Delegate: #methods and #public_methods should return delegated methods too
Issue #2496 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#27230] [Bug #2502] strange behavior of anonymous class inside a proc — caleb clausen <redmine@...>
Bug #2502: strange behavior of anonymous class inside a proc
[#27238] Why doesn't Array include Comparable? — Martin DeMello <martindemello@...>
Array already defines <=>, why not include Comparable as well?
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Martin DeMello <martindemello@gmail.com>wrote:
[#27242] select! — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>
Forwarded from ruby-talk:
Hi,
[#27244] [Bug #2505] Threads behave inconsistently across platforms. — Christian Höltje <redmine@...>
Bug #2505: Threads behave inconsistently across platforms.
[#27256] [Feature #2509] Recursive freezing? — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>
Feature #2509: Recursive freezing?
[#27270] rb_eql, rb_equal — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>
would it be more efficient to add an extra == in there for these
[#27275] [Bug #2511] irb exits unexpectedly windows — Vlad Why <redmine@...>
Bug #2511: irb exits unexpectedly windows
[#27286] [Bug #2515] Array#select! — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Bug #2515: Array#select!
Issue #2515 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#27304] Ruby 1.8: Improved Rational performance by 10% — Kurt Stephens <ks@...>
http://kurtstephens.com/node/105
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Kurt Stephens <ks@kurtstephens.com> wrote:
[#27324] [Bug #2530] Future timestamps in 1.8.7-p248 generate recursive compilation process — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>
Bug #2530: Future timestamps in 1.8.7-p248 generate recursive compilation process
[#27360] [Feature #2542] URI lib should be updated to RFC 39886 — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>
Feature #2542: URI lib should be updated to RFC 39886
Issue #2542 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[ruby-core:26966] Re: Caching #to_s for immutables (and a possible future for constant-folding) [with patch]
What causes this following error?: NotImplementedError: method `method_missing' called on hidden T_STRING object (0x9aed298 flags=0x900805 klass=0x0) What is a "hidden" object? Kurt Stephens wrote: > I just ran rubyspec against it; ~ 5% time improvement. > > WITH PATCH: > > > time mspec -t /home/kurt/local/ruby/kstephens/bin/ruby > > 2849 files, 13035 examples, 186461 expectations, 231 failures, 441 errors > > real 4m18.626s > user 0m23.349s > sys 0m8.685s > > WITHOUT PATCH: > > > time mspec -t /home/kurt/local/ruby/trunk/bin/ruby > 2849 files, 13035 examples, 187339 expectations, 246 failures, 318 errors > > real 4m30.655s > user 0m28.386s > sys 0m9.857s > > Note the difference in failures/errors. I don't know yet if these are > errors due to the intended semantic difference or actual bugs. What > might be the best way to see the differences in object allocations and GCs? > > > Roger Pack wrote: >>> Yes. The MRI test suite runs at 45 sec with these changes and at 53 sec >>> without. The MRI tests pass with no issues. There is a naive test >>> in the >>> attached patch that demonstrates the improvements. >> >> Wow that's a pretty good improvement. I like it. >> >> What's the speed difference for make test-all? >> > Didn't know about test-all. Right now test-all has some failures > related to frozen String. So there is still more work to be done. :( > > 6836 tests, 1826745 assertions, 56 failures, 248 errors, 0 skips > make: *** [yes-test-all] Error 1 > > real 4m23.824s > user 1m45.195s > sys 0m27.594s > >>>> Does it break rails? >>> I don't know yet. I need to setup a proper Rails test environment. >> >> Yeah that would be nice, as well as comparing speeds for the test runs >> to see if it's useful. >> >>> There maybe some native thread issues with the cache hash tables, but >>> I did >>> start adding a mutex to each one. I have not tested on 64-bit or >>> anything >>> other that Ubunutu 9.10. >> >> Would there be thread issues if each thread runs under the GLI? >> >> Thanks. >> -r >> > >