[#89088] More questions about =~ — GGarramuno@... (GGarramuno)

irb(main):006:1* class String

14 messages 2004/01/01

[#89119] Loop/Iterator questions — GGarramuno@... (GGarramuno)

1) Is there anything like Perl's continue block available? This is

15 messages 2004/01/02

[#89189] Best way to send mail in ruby — Bauduin Raphael <rb@...>

Hi,

11 messages 2004/01/03

[#89193] Simple Ruby DB apps/programs ... — Useko Netsumi <usenets@...>

I was wondering if there are some example of small Ruby(1.8.1) Database

14 messages 2004/01/03

[#89261] class Time doesn't pass year 2038? — Jean-Baptiste <temuphaey0@...>

15 messages 2004/01/05

[#89339] Compression (besides Huffman) and Ruby — "Josef 'Jupp' SCHUGT" <jupp@...>

Hi!

14 messages 2004/01/07

[#89367] Database applications and OOness — Tim Bates <tim@...>

People,

63 messages 2004/01/07
[#89455] Re: Database applications and OOness — "dhtapp" <dhtapp@...> 2004/01/08

I've been watching this thread with a great deal of interest. I'm

[#89456] block delimiting — Pete Yadlowsky <pmy@...> 2004/01/08

[#89465] Re: block delimiting — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/01/08

On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 04:33:15 +0900, Pete y wrote:

[#89453] ruby 1.8.1 windows installer — KONTRA Gergely <kgergely@...>

Hi!

26 messages 2004/01/08
[#89716] Re: ruby 1.8.1 windows installer — intc_ctor@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/01/12

>

[#89860] Re: ruby 1.8.1 windows installer — Alan Davies <NOSPAMcs96and@...> 2004/01/14

> Since the first edition of the Pickaxe book didn't exactly fly off the

[#89460] Re: block delimiting — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

21 messages 2004/01/08

[#89590] regex to NOT match? — Ruby Baby <ruby@...>

Sorry it seems like the smallest thing, but I'm stuck on this.

16 messages 2004/01/10

[#89611] Converting a string to an array of tokens — "John W. Long" <ws@...>

Is there a fast way to convert a string into a list of tokens?

17 messages 2004/01/11

[#89672] faster integer arithmetics & arbitrary precision floating number — David Garamond <lists@...6.isreserved.com>

1. Is there a way in Ruby to speed up 32bit integer arithmetics (only

43 messages 2004/01/12
[#89686] Re: faster integer arithmetics & arbitrary precision floating number — Ara.T.Howard@... 2004/01/12

On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, David Garamond wrote:

[#89709] Re: faster integer arithmetics & arbitrary precision floating number — Charles Mills <boson@...> 2004/01/12

What abouts Rubys design would make integer arithmetic slower than integer

[#89710] Re: faster integer arithmetics & arbitrary precision floating number — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/01/12

[#89711] Re: faster integer arithmetics & arbitrary precision floating number — Charles Mills <boson@...> 2004/01/12

On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#89718] Getting the tail of a list? — Carsten Eckelmann <careck@...42.com>

Hi everybody,

19 messages 2004/01/12

[#89796] Ruby OS mentioned on /. — intc_ctor@... (Phil Tomson)

http://developers.slashdot.org/developers/04/01/13/0123250.shtml?tid=185&tid=190

20 messages 2004/01/13
[#89805] Re: Ruby OS mentioned on /. — Paul William <maillist@...> 2004/01/13

./ normally does not have vaporware... are a bunch of ruby (a very high

[#89806] Re: Ruby OS mentioned on /. — "Zach Dennis" <zdennis@...> 2004/01/13

Somehow i have this strange feeling that not all ruby peeps are strictly

[#89975] drb, firewall, ssh tunneling, and yield — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>

14 messages 2004/01/16
[#89976] Re: drb, firewall, ssh tunneling, and yield — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...> 2004/01/16

On Jan 15, 2004, at 19:10, Joel VanderWerf wrote:

[#90013] Fighting Ruby's bad fame — gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com>

Hi gurus and nubys,

42 messages 2004/01/16
[#90097] Re: Fighting Ruby's bad fame — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/01/18

In article <af53b0ba.0401171921.7cf9b9b7@posting.google.com>,

[#90023] Installing a program Unix-like — Malte Milatz <malteDELETETHIS@...>

Users of Linux, FreeBSD etc. are used to downloading an archive,

13 messages 2004/01/16

[#90077] long expression syntax — rick.hu@... (Rick Hu)

why do I get a syntax error for

13 messages 2004/01/17

[#90086] is Ruby the right language for these projects? — Ruby Baby <ruby@...>

Please forgive my self-centered question. I've been learning all about Ruby

16 messages 2004/01/18

[#90139] segfaults on mandrake... — Ferenc Engard <ferenc@...>

Hello,

16 messages 2004/01/18

[#90200] regex help — Chris Morris <chrismo@...>

I need a re such that:

18 messages 2004/01/19

[#90228] Re: New to Python: my impression v. Perl/Ruby — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson)

In article <mailman.493.1074484056.12720.python-list@python.org>,

36 messages 2004/01/20
[#90292] Re: New to Python: my impression v. Perl/Ruby — Ville Vainio <ville.spamstermeister.vainio@...> 2004/01/20

>>>>> "Phil" == Phil Tomson <ptkwt@aracnet.com> writes:

[#90294] Re: New to Python: my impression v. Perl/Ruby — "Zach Dennis" <zdennis@...> 2004/01/20

Ville>Though "sending messages" to int literals is a syntax error.

[#90332] Re: New to Python: my impression v. Perl/Ruby — GGarramuno@... (GGarramuno) 2004/01/21

"Zach Dennis" <zdennis@mktec.com> wrote in message news:<AKEKIKLMCFIHPEAHKAAICEOHHFAA.zdennis@mktec.com>...

[#90333] Re: New to Python: my impression v. Perl/Ruby — Gregory Millam <walker@...> 2004/01/21

Received: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 16:59:59 +0900

[#90317] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — "Volkmann, Mark" <Mark.Volkmann@...>

I think one of the main points of learning a new language each year is that

18 messages 2004/01/21

[#90354] Modules as namespace — gm@... (George Moschovitis)

Hello everyone,

16 messages 2004/01/21

[#90405] Very basic Ruby docs/books/tutorial? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hello,

12 messages 2004/01/22

[#90472] Ruby/Extensions v0.3 released — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

A new version of Ruby/Extensions, a suite of useful methods added to

17 messages 2004/01/23

[#90505] Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — Patrick Bennett <patrick.bennett@...>

I find it immensely useful when dealing with arrays to be able to

25 messages 2004/01/23
[#90507] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — Gennady <gfb@...> 2004/01/23

Patrick Bennett wrote:

[#90510] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — Patrick Bennett <patrick.bennett@...> 2004/01/23

Hmmm, thanks, but it's a bit 'non-obvious' to casual Ruby programmers

[#90512] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — Gennady <gfb@...> 2004/01/23

[#90524] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2004/01/23

On Friday 23 January 2004 06:43 pm, Gennady wrote:

[#90598] perl bug File::Basename and Perl's nature — xah@... (Xah Lee)

Just bumped into another irresponsibility in perl.

19 messages 2004/01/25

[#90667] ruby-math and "why is ** not abelian?" — vanjac12@... (Van Jacques)

I was reading the 1st thread in the ruby-math discussion at

11 messages 2004/01/26

[#90750] choosing ruby? — Piergiuliano Bossi <p_bossi_AGAINST_SPAM@...>

We are on the way to start a new project, a web application with a bunch

20 messages 2004/01/27

[#90756] Editor — Safran von Twesla <me@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2004/01/27

[#90770] newbee question about "missing" hash methods +, += and << — benny <linux@...>

Hi,

25 messages 2004/01/27

[#90913] vimrc for Ruby or rubytidy — Theodore Knab <tjk@...>

Does someone have a '.vimrc' file they will share

17 messages 2004/01/29
[#90914] Re: vimrc for Ruby or rubytidy — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/01/29

> Does someone have a '.vimrc' file they will share

[#90971] time comparison — tony summerfelt <snowzone5@...>

i want to parse and trim a log file. the date format log file looks like:

13 messages 2004/01/29

[#91005] Ruby and Perl Integration — "John W. Long" <ws@...>

All this talk about RJNI has gotten me thinking. Has anyone attempted to

17 messages 2004/01/30
[#91007] Re: Ruby and Perl Integration — Thomas Adam <thomas_adam16@...> 2004/01/30

--- "John W. Long" <ws@johnwlong.com> wrote:

[#91056] principle of most suprise — tony summerfelt <snowzone5@...>

gah, ruby is doing it to me again:

31 messages 2004/01/30

[#91071] Accesing to private attributes — "Imobach =?iso-8859-15?q?Gonz=E1lez_Sosa?=" <imodev@...>

Hi all,

14 messages 2004/01/30

[#91088] flip flop operator and assignment — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson)

I'm working on the pattern matching section for

25 messages 2004/01/31

[#91089] No difference between .. and ... flip/flop operators? — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson)

50 messages 2004/01/31

[#91099] Ruby 1.8.1 REXML performance — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...>

I have a script that uses REXML to stream parse an XML file and load a

27 messages 2004/01/31

[#91104] graphics lib? — Alwin Blok <alwinblok@...>

Hello,

38 messages 2004/01/31
[#91262] Re: graphics lib? — Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...> 2004/02/02

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 16:18:50 -0600, Charles Comstock wrote:

[#91362] Re: graphics lib? — Charles Comstock <cc1@...> 2004/02/03

Simon Strandgaard wrote:

Re: perl bug File::Basename and Perl's nature

From: yf110@...1.victoria.tc.ca (Malcolm Dew-Jones)
Date: 2004-01-25 07:10:07 UTC
List: ruby-talk #90608
Xah Lee (xah@xahlee.org) wrote:
: Just bumped into another irresponsibility in perl.

: the crime in question this time is the module File::Basename.

: Reproduction:

: 1. create a directory containing a file of this name: "cdrom.html".
: 2. "use File::Basename;", with the line:
:    ($name,$path,$suffix) = fileparse($File::Find::name, ('.html',
: '.m'));
: 3. Notice that your cdrom.html will be parsed into "cdr" with suffix
: "om.html".

Well, that's what you asked for, isn't it.

: expletive Perl and Perl slinging morons.

: Now, if you peruse the "documentation" of "perldoc File::Basename",
: you'll see that it shouldn't be so. AND, the writting as usuall is
: fantastic incompetent. To illustrate, i quote:

: --begin quote

:  fileparse

:  The fileparse() routine divides a file
:  specification into three parts: a leading path, a
:  file name, and a suffix. The path contains
:  everything up to and including the last directory
:  separator in the input file specification. The
:  remainder of the input file specification is then
:  divided into name and suffix based on the
:  optional patterns you specify in
:  @suffixlist. Each element of this list can be a
:  qr-quoted pattern (or a string which is
:  interpreted as a regular expression), and is
:  matched against the end of name. If this
:  succeeds, the matching portion of name is removed
:  and prepended to suffix. By proper use of
:  @suffixlist, you can remove file types or
:  versions for examination.

: --end quote

Well it sounds to me like it says it will do what it did.

: Note the last sentence: "By proper use of @suffixlist, you can remove
: file types or versions for examination." Now, this is in sync with the
: usual verbiages of unix man pages, of mentioning irrevalent things.

How is it irrelevent to mention the purpose of the parameter?

: Why the fuck do i need to know what is version, or examination what??

If you don't need to know the version then don't ask the routine to parse
it off of the file name.

As for "or examination what", it takes some pretty obscure, poetical
parsing of english to make sense of this, so I will instead merely assume
you lacked the ability to understand what you read.


: Not every morons in this world is using unix with its morinic
: convention of appending things to file names as a versioning system,

Well that's right isn't it.  Some of us morons use other moronic systems,
such as VMS sometimes.  I must admit though, I rather find VMS's
"moronic", automatic, operating system supported _versioning_ of every
file is an extremely nice feature, allowing me (potentially) to examine,
recover, or reuse, any one of the versions of every file I ever touched
(since the last PURGE, anyway).

And you're right, one has no need to know the version number of a file for
any normal operation on VMS any more than a unix programmer normally needs
to know the inode number of a file, but on the other hand, when you do
certain file manipulations then you do need to know it, and since the
easiest way to access it is via the file name then it looks to me that in
that case the version number returned for my _examination_ by the above
mentioned module might be a good way to do that.

(You sure are rude by the way.)


: and not every moron in this world need to "exam" things. 

"exam" is a noun, and therefore this is also sort of true, but only
because it's a bit of a tautology to say that somene doesn't need to do
something nonsensical.


: The unix
: irrevalency, inprecision, driveling are paragoned above.


: Here is a better documentation for the fileparse subroutine.

:  fileparse

:  fileparse divides a file name into 3 parts:
:  directory string, file name, file name
:  suffix. fileparse($filename, @suffixes) returns a
:  array of 3 elements ($name, $dir_path,
:  $suffix). The concocted result of
:  "dir_path$name$suffix" is guaranteed to equal to
:  $filename. The @suffixes is a array of strings,
:  for example ('\.html', '\.txt', '\.png'). These
:  strings are interpreted to be regular
:  expressions, and is matched against the end of
:  $filename.

"concocted"?


: But NOOO, ... morons are too enamored with driveling

well well, what do we find at the end, sure enough, this also is true.

In This Thread