From: Michael campbell Date: 2004-02-01T08:47:29+09:00 Subject: Re: Save the flip/flop op! Nathaniel Talbott wrote: > It feels like to me that there's a simple, clear and brilliant approach > hiding under this need, but I sure can't see it at this point. If you > can, please chime in :-) Yes, it's the ".." operator... >=)