ruby-talk

I want to restrict the result set returned from the tables([pattern]) function of the ODBC:Database class. What types of a "pattern" does this funcion accept?

1 message 2004/01/20

[#90280] ruby-dev summary 22574-22624 — Kazuo Saito <ksaito@...>

Hi all,

1 message 2004/01/20

[#90282] Numerical problems of mswin32 Ruby — "Javier Goizueta" <jgoizueta@...>

I've been doing some comparisons between two Windows ports of Ruby

1 message 2004/01/20

[#90286] Ruby/ODBC, Oracle 9.2, table(pattern) function — "Martin D. McLauchlan" <MartyMcL@...>

THIS IS NOT AN ATTACHMENT

1 message 2004/01/20

[#90287] DBI improvement — Ferenc Engard <ferenc@...>

Hello,

3 messages 2004/01/20

[#90289] Re: DBI improvement — "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@...> 2004/01/20

On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Ferenc Engard wrote:

[#90367] Re: DBI improvement — Ferenc Engard <ferenc@...> 2004/01/21

"Ara.T.Howard" wrote:

[#90288] Re: Numerical problems of mswin32 Ruby — "Berger, Daniel" <djberge@...>

> Javier Goizueta wrote:

1 message 2004/01/20

[#90290] Socket hang (was recursive call problem) — "Greg Brondo" <greg@...>

Ok..Here's the new code...might be a bug in net/ftp or the socket code. The

3 messages 2004/01/20

[#90335] Re: Socket hang (was recursive call problem) — ts <decoux@...> 2004/01/21

>>>>> "G" == Greg Brondo <greg@brondo.com> writes:

[#90826] Re: Socket hang (was recursive call problem) — "Greg Brondo" <greg@...> 2004/01/27

Thanks! That worked. One more questions though....

[#90291] question about blocks — Ferenc Engard <ferenc@...>

Hello,

8 messages 2004/01/20

[#90308] Re: question about blocks — nobu.nokada@... 2004/01/20

Hi,

[#90293] Re: question about blocks — Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...> 2004/01/20

On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 05:37:48 +0900, Ferenc Engard wrote:

[#90295] Re: question about blocks — Jamis Buck <jgb3@...> 2004/01/20

Simon Strandgaard wrote:

[#90310] Re: question about blocks — Charles Mills <boson@...> 2004/01/20

On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Simon Strandgaard wrote:

[#90312] Re: question about blocks — Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...> 2004/01/20

On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 08:03:33 +0900, Charles Mills wrote:

[#90313] Re: question about blocks — Charles Mills <boson@...> 2004/01/20

On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Simon Strandgaard wrote:

[#90369] Re: question about blocks — Ferenc Engard <ferenc@...> 2004/01/21

> > How can I return a value from a block? "return" immediately returns from

[#90299] enable debugflag in module — Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...>

To ease unittesting I have made a #debug keyword, which enables

3 messages 2004/01/20

[#90314] Re: enable debugflag in module — nobu.nokada@... 2004/01/20

Hi,

[#90346] Re: enable debugflag in module — Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...> 2004/01/21

On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 08:20:00 +0900, nobu.nokad wrote:

[#90301] Re: New to Python: my impression v. Perl/Ruby — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

1 message 2004/01/20

[#90309] Proposal for programming language of the year — Christian Szegedy <szegedy@...>

Pragmatic Programmers wrote, that every year a new language should be

8 messages 2004/01/20

[#90339] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2004/01/21

Christian Szegedy wrote:

[#90343] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — Martin DeMello <martindemello@...> 2004/01/21

Robert Feldt <feldt@ce.chalmers.se> wrote:

[#90398] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — wsdng@... (Sascha D?rdelmann) 2004/01/22

Christian Szegedy <szegedy@t-online.de> wrote in message news:<bukb6v$edh$07$1@news.t-online.com>...

[#90465] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — "Chris Pine" <cpine@...> 2004/01/23

Well, I don't think anyone has mentioned Icon yet, but it is a pretty cool

[#90492] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — jason r tibbetts <tibbetts@...> 2004/01/23

Chris,

[#90741] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — Frank Schmitt <invalid@...> 2004/01/27

wsdng@onlinehome.de (Sascha D?rdelmann) writes:

[#90749] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — GGarramuno@... (GGarramuno) 2004/01/27

Robert Feldt <feldt@ce.chalmers.se> wrote in message news:<400E67CA.1030301@ce.chalmers.se>...

[#90317] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — "Volkmann, Mark" <Mark.Volkmann@...>

I think one of the main points of learning a new language each year is that

18 messages 2004/01/21

[#90323] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — "Shashank Date" <sdate@...> 2004/01/21

[#90324] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — Joey Gibson <joey@...> 2004/01/21

On 1/20/2004 11:14 PM, Shashank Date wrote:

[#90326] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — Carsten Eckelmann <careck@...42.com> 2004/01/21

Joey Gibson wrote:

[#90340] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — Joey Gibson <joey@...> 2004/01/21

On 1/21/2004 1:05 AM, Carsten Eckelmann wrote:

[#90318] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — Carsten Eckelmann <careck@...42.com> 2004/01/21

Volkmann, Mark wrote:

[#90320] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — Christian Szegedy <szegedy@...> 2004/01/21

Volkmann, Mark wrote:

[#90325] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — "Shashank Date" <sdate@...> 2004/01/21

[#90328] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — Joe Mason <joe@...> 2004/01/21

In article <89539780CB9BD51182270002A5897DF605ED006B@hqempn04.agedwards.com>, Volkmann, Mark wrote:

[#90348] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — jason r tibbetts <tibbetts@...> 2004/01/21

Quoting Joe Mason <joe@notcharles.ca>:

[#90349] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — Jamis Buck <jgb3@...> 2004/01/21

jason r tibbetts wrote:

[#90352] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — Christian Szegedy <szegedy@...> 2004/01/21

Jamis Buck wrote:

[#90366] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — avi@...4.com (Avi Bryant) 2004/01/21

Carsten Eckelmann <careck@circle42.com> wrote in message news:<400E16B5.6070505@circle42.com>...

[#90406] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — Rasputin <rasputnik@...> 2004/01/22

Avi Bryant wrote:

[#90408] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — Joey Gibson <joey@...> 2004/01/22

On 1/22/2004 8:22 AM, Rasputin wrote:

[#90400] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — Joe Mason <joe@...> 2004/01/22

In article <1074695649.400e8de12ebc5@webmail.toadmail.com>, jason r tibbetts wrote:

[#90455] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — avi@...4.com (Avi Bryant) 2004/01/23

Rasputin <rasputnik@hellooperator.net> wrote in message news:<400FCE8C.30405@hellooperator.net>...

[#90459] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — Joey Gibson <joey@...> 2004/01/23

On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Avi Bryant wrote:

[#90319] Parsing periods of time: Code and questions — "Josef 'Jupp' SCHUGT" <jupp@...>

Hi!

4 messages 2004/01/21

[#90337] Re: Parsing periods of time: Code and questions — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/21

[#90363] Re: Parsing periods of time: Code and questions — sera@... (Francis Hwang) 2004/01/21

All sounds really interesting and useful. One question: Are you sure

[#90344] Re: Parsing periods of time: Code and questions — Carlos <angus@...> 2004/01/21

> 1. Should one require integral values or would it be better to allow

[#90345] Re: ldap - openldap — "Bennett, Patrick" <Patrick.Bennett@...>

Actually the MS ldap api is part of windows (the platform sdk) already

2 messages 2004/01/21

[#90347] Re: ldap - openldap — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2004/01/21

Quoteing Patrick.Bennett@inin.com, on Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 10:54:39PM +0900:

[#90350] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — "Volkmann, Mark" <Mark.Volkmann@...>

> -----Original Message-----

1 message 2004/01/21

[#90353] no timeslicing? — Rasputin <rasputnik@...>

5 messages 2004/01/21

[#90360] Re: no timeslicing? — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/21

[#90358] Re: no timeslicing? — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2004/01/21

> symbols = %w( = ^ V < > @ # ! )

[#90376] Re: no timeslicing? — Rasputin <rasputnik@...> 2004/01/21

Pit Capitain wrote:

[#90357] Re: no timeslicing? — Florian Gross <flgr@...> 2004/01/21

> But the scheduler doesnt seem to want to run any threads

[#90354] Modules as namespace — gm@... (George Moschovitis)

Hello everyone,

16 messages 2004/01/21

[#90359] Re: Modules as namespace — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/21

[#90718] Re: Modules as namespace — gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com> 2004/01/26

il Tue, 27 Jan 2004 07:30:12 +0900, Nikolai Weibull

[#90515] Re: Modules as namespace — gm@... (George Moschovitis) 2004/01/23

> First of all, you can only do this when the modules already

[#90541] Re: Modules as namespace — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/01/24

Hi,

[#90549] Re: Modules as namespace — "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@...> 2004/01/24

On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#90355] Re: Modules as namespace — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/01/21

George Moschovitis wrote:

[#90356] Re: Modules as namespace — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/01/21

Hi,

[#90361] Re: Modules as namespace — "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@...> 2004/01/21

On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#90362] Re: Modules as namespace — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...> 2004/01/21

On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 04:54:59 +0900

[#90391] Re: Modules as namespace — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/01/22

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#90578] Re: Modules as namespace — gm@... (George Moschovitis) 2004/01/24

> What do you mean by "flexible way to declare namespaces"?

[#90582] Re: Modules as namespace — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/01/24

Hi --

[#90583] Re: Modules as namespace — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/24

[#90716] Re: Modules as namespace — Nikolai Weibull <ruby-talk@...> 2004/01/26

* Robert Klemme <bob.news@gmx.net> [Jan, 24 2004 20:00]:

[#90692] Re: Modules as namespace — gm@... (George Moschovitis) 2004/01/26

> $ irb --prompt simple

[#90364] Initial Problem... — Safran von Twesla <me@...>

Hi group,

1 message 2004/01/21

[#90374] Re: Fighting Ruby's bad fame — "Weirich, James" <James.Weirich@...>

> That is, you can have something like:

1 message 2004/01/21

[#90375] gsub oddity? — Ralph Mason <ralph.mason@...>

What am I missing here. I am trying to replace a single quote with the

8 messages 2004/01/21

[#90404] Re: gsub oddity? — mike@... (Mike Stok) 2004/01/22

In article <buo0rc$j5ef5$1@ID-52924.news.uni-berlin.de>,

[#90430] Re: gsub oddity? — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/01/22

Mike Stok wrote:

[#90468] Re: gsub oddity? — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/23

[#90407] Re: gsub oddity? — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/22

[#90377] Re: gsub oddity? — "Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@...> 2004/01/21

On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 06:57:22AM +0900, Ralph Mason wrote:

[#90395] Re: gsub oddity? — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/22

[#90418] Re: gsub oddity? — "Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@...> 2004/01/22

On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:15:35AM +0100, Robert Klemme wrote:

[#90378] Boost Protein Expression by Codon Optimization — Sally Wang <service@...>

Dear Colleague,

6 messages 2004/01/21

[#90396] Re: Boost Protein Expression by Codon Optimization — Joe Mason <joe@...> 2004/01/22

In article <20040121235935.0F523445E60@helium.ruby-lang.org>, Sally Wang wrote:

[#90419] Re: Boost Protein Expression by Codon Optimization — jrb3@... 2004/01/22

Inadvertant(?) spammer saith:

[#90433] Re: Boost Protein Expression by Codon Optimization — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/01/22

jrb3@eidogen.com wrote:

[#90439] Re: Boost Protein Expression by Codon Optimization — "Josef 'Jupp' SCHUGT" <jupp@...> 2004/01/22

Hi!

[#90443] Re: Boost Protein Expression by Codon Optimization — intc_ctor@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/01/22

jrb3@eidogen.com wrote in message news:<41962.216.135.205.211.1074791313.squirrel@castle>...

[#90379] Trouble installing eRuby on MacOS X 10.3 — Gavin Kistner <gavin@...>

All day I have been trying to get mod_ruby and eRuby installed on MacOS

6 messages 2004/01/22

[#90383] Re: Trouble installing eRuby on MacOS X 10.3 — kevin_mcconnell@... (Kevin M) 2004/01/22

Gavin Kistner <gavin@refinery.com> wrote in message news:<GoEPb.118161$xy6.376643@attbi_s02>...

[#90385] Re: Trouble installing eRuby on MacOS X 10.3 — Gavin Kistner <gavin@...> 2004/01/22

Kevin M wrote:

[#90380] Re: Trouble installing eRuby on MacOS X 10.3 — Gennady <gfb@...> 2004/01/22

1. Run configure with option "--enable-shared" where appropriate.

[#90384] Re: Trouble installing eRuby on MacOS X 10.3 — Gavin Kistner <gavin@...> 2004/01/22

Gennady wrote:

[#90424] Re: Trouble installing eRuby on MacOS X 10.3 — kevin_mcconnell@... (Kevin M) 2004/01/22

> What does it do? And do I want it on both eRuby and mod_ruby, or only eRuby?

[#90393] How can I report a BigDecimal fix? — "Javier Goizueta" <jgoizueta@...>

Hello,

3 messages 2004/01/22

[#90403] Re: How can I report a BigDecimal fix? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/01/22

[#90412] Re: How can I report a BigDecimal fix? — "Shigeo Kobayashi" <shigeo@...> 2004/01/22

Hi Javier,

[#90401] Dir set different owner ? — Svend-Erik Madsen <sv-erik@..._stofanet.dk>

2 messages 2004/01/22

[#90421] Re: Dir set different owner ? Solved — Svend-Erik Madsen <sv-erik@..._stofanet.dk> 2004/01/22

[#90402] DRb error with Ruby 1.8.1 — Martin Hart <martin@...>

1 message 2004/01/22

[#90405] Very basic Ruby docs/books/tutorial? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hello,

12 messages 2004/01/22

[#90434] Re: Very basic Ruby docs/books/tutorial? — "MikkelFJ" <mikkel-removethis@...> 2004/01/22

[#90409] Re: Very basic Ruby docs/books/tutorial? — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2004/01/22

On Thursday, 22 January 2004 at 21:39:04 +0900, Robert Feldt wrote:

[#90410] Re: Very basic Ruby docs/books/tutorial? — Erik Terpstra <erik@...> 2004/01/22

Robert Feldt wrote:

[#90413] Re: Very basic Ruby docs/books/tutorial? — jason r tibbetts <tibbetts@...> 2004/01/22

Erik,

[#90416] Re: Very basic Ruby docs/books/tutorial? — gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com> 2004/01/22

il Thu, 22 Jan 2004 14:59:37 +0100, Erik Terpstra <erik@solidcode.net>

[#90445] Re: Very basic Ruby docs/books/tutorial? — Michael Vondung <mvondung@...> 2004/01/22

On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 21:39:04 +0900, Robert Feldt

[#90450] Re: Very basic Ruby docs/books/tutorial? — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/01/22

Michael Vondung wrote:

[#90464] Re: Very basic Ruby docs/books/tutorial? — "Chris Pine" <cpine@...> 2004/01/23

There's also my humble tutorial:

[#90490] Re: Very basic Ruby docs/books/tutorial? — Theodore Knab <tjk@...> 2004/01/23

I looked at your tutorial today.

[#90469] Re: Very basic Ruby docs/books/tutorial? — Carsten Eckelmann <careck@...42.com> 2004/01/23

Chris Pine wrote:

[#90489] Re: Very basic Ruby docs/books/tutorial? — "Chris Pine" <cpine@...> 2004/01/23

----- Original Message -----

[#90411] Marshal format filter? 1.6.8 to 1.8.1 — "Berger, Daniel" <djberge@...>

Hi all,

3 messages 2004/01/22

[#90414] Re: Marshal format filter? 1.6.8 to 1.8.1 — Kirk Haines <khaines@...> 2004/01/22

On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#90415] Re: Marshal format filter? 1.6.8 to 1.8.1 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/01/22

Hi,

[#90417] help with Win32API — David Garamond <lists@...6.isreserved.com>

I'm trying to do the equivalent of this C code:

4 messages 2004/01/22

[#90444] Re: help with Win32API — ggarramuno@... (GGarramuno) 2004/01/22

Without checking in detail, it seems you are on the right track.

[#90523] Re: help with Win32API — sveit@... (Stephen Veit) 2004/01/23

David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com> wrote in message news:<400FF2F2.7080800@zara.6.isreserved.com>...

[#90569] Re: help with Win32API — David Garamond <lists@...6.isreserved.com> 2004/01/24

Stephen Veit wrote:

[#90420] BibTeX parser — Daniel Carrera <dcarrera@...>

Hi all,

5 messages 2004/01/22

[#90432] Re: BibTeX parser — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/01/22

On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 03:34:27AM +0900, Daniel Carrera wrote:

[#90436] Re: BibTeX parser — Daniel Carrera <dcarrera@...> 2004/01/22

On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 06:08:37AM +0900, Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:

[#90480] Re: BibTeX parser — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/01/23

On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 06:27:45AM +0900, Daniel Carrera wrote:

[#90471] Re: BibTeX parser — "Josef 'Jupp' SCHUGT" <jupp@...> 2004/01/23

Hi!

[#90422] Parse Date bug? — Guillaume Marcais <guslist@...>

Parse Date returns illegal values in a date. Ex:

6 messages 2004/01/22

[#90460] Re: Parse Date bug? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/01/23

Hi,

[#90580] Re: Parse Date bug? — Gavin Kistner <gavin@...> 2004/01/24

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#90584] Re: Parse Date bug? — "Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@...> 2004/01/24

On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 06:28:38PM +0000, Gavin Kistner wrote:

[#90585] Re: Parse Date bug? — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/01/24

On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 03:29:56 +0900, Gavin Kistner wrote:

[#90637] Re: Parse Date bug? — Aredridel <aredridel@...> 2004/01/25

On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 04:20:21AM +0900, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#90423] REXML and IOSource — kapheine@... (Zachary P. Landau)

[I posted this earlier but it never showed up. If this is a repeat, I apologize.]

1 message 2004/01/22

[#90425] Scala programming language — "MikkelFJ" <mikkel-removethis@...>

I just discovered the Scala programming language.

4 messages 2004/01/22

[#90435] Re: Scala programming language — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/01/22

On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 04:49:59AM +0900, MikkelFJ wrote:

[#90431] Re: Scala programming language — "MikkelFJ" <mikkel-removethis@...> 2004/01/22

[#90426] Re: Scala programming language — Gennady <gfb@...> 2004/01/22

MikkelFJ wrote:

[#90428] Socket.gethosbyname AgrumentError — Dalibor Sramek <dali@...>

Hi.

3 messages 2004/01/22

[#90453] Re: Socket.gethosbyname AgrumentError — Theodore Knab <tjk@...> 2004/01/23

Seems to work on Debian Sarge Linux.

[#90463] Re: Socket.gethosbyname AgrumentError — Neil Spring <nspring@...> 2004/01/23

On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 05:44:56AM +0900, Dalibor Sramek wrote:

[#90437] how to broadcast UDP packets — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>

10 messages 2004/01/22

[#90447] Re: how to broadcast UDP packets — Yan-Fa Li <yanfali@...> 2004/01/22

Have you tried binding to the network broadcast address rather than the

[#90446] Re: how to broadcast UDP packets — Florian Frank <flori@...> 2004/01/22

On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 22:38, Joel VanderWerf wrote:

[#90448] Re: how to broadcast UDP packets — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/01/22

Florian,

[#90452] Re: how to broadcast UDP packets — Florian Frank <flori@...> 2004/01/23

On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 00:37, Hal Fulton wrote:

[#90454] Re: how to broadcast UDP packets — "Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@...> 2004/01/23

On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 09:52:47AM +0900, Florian Frank wrote:

[#90467] Y-Combinator (was: how to broadcast UDP packets) — Jim Weirich <jweirich@...> 2004/01/23

Florian Frank wrote:

[#90633] Re: Y-Combinator (was: how to broadcast UDP packets) — Florian Frank <flori@...> 2004/01/25

[#90449] Re: how to broadcast UDP packets — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/01/22

Florian Frank wrote:

[#90536] Re: Y-Combinator (was: how to broadcast UDP packets) — "Shashank Date" <sdate@...> 2004/01/24

[#90440] scriptroute — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>

1 message 2004/01/22

[#90441] 1.8.1 build errors on Sun Sparc — Bil Kleb <Bil.Kleb@...>

I couldn't find anything at blade...

2 messages 2004/01/22

[#90590] Re: 1.8.1 build errors on Sun Sparc — Bil Kleb <Bil.Kleb@...> 2004/01/24

Bil Kleb wrote:

[#90442] Questions on Rite and embedding — Jeremy Henty <jeremy@...>

I read Matz's "How Ruby Sucks"

3 messages 2004/01/22

[#90466] Re: Questions on Rite and embedding — Jeremy Henty <jeremy@...> 2004/01/23

In article <6214648293.20040123011616@scriptolutions.com>, Lothar

[#90451] Re: Questions on Rite and embedding — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...> 2004/01/23

Hello Jeremy,

[#90456] Class.new and inspect — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...>

I'm curious as to how this little bit of magic works:

2 messages 2004/01/23

[#90457] Re: Class.new and inspect — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/01/23

Hi,

[#90458] Smarty template engine for Ruby - anyone interested? — Ruby Baby <ruby@...>

Here's an idea:

2 messages 2004/01/23

[#90478] Re: Smarty template engine for Ruby - anyone interested? — Ruby Baby <ruby@...> 2004/01/23

> Ruby Baby <ruby@hitmedia.com> writes:

[#90462] ruby-1.8.1 build failed on HP-UX 10 — Bil Kleb <Bil.Kleb@...>

I found a Japanese note about this in the developer list,

3 messages 2004/01/23

[#90897] Re: ruby-1.8.1 build failed on HP-UX 10 — Bil Kleb <Bil.Kleb@...> 2004/01/28

Bil Kleb wrote:

[#90926] Re: ruby-1.8.1 build failed on HP-UX 10 — nobu.nokada@... 2004/01/29

Hi,

[#90470] Re: Scala programming language — "Robert McGovern" <robertm@...>

> heh everybody's talking about Scala nowadays ;-)

1 message 2004/01/23

[#90472] Ruby/Extensions v0.3 released — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

A new version of Ruby/Extensions, a suite of useful methods added to

17 messages 2004/01/23

[#90516] Re: [ANN] Ruby/Extensions v0.3 released — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2004/01/23

On Friday 23 January 2004 02:06 pm, Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#90532] Re: [ANN] Ruby/Extensions v0.3 released — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/01/23

On Saturday, January 24, 2004, 5:07:40 AM, T. wrote:

[#90537] Re: [ANN] Ruby/Extensions v0.3 released — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2004/01/24

On Saturday 24 January 2004 12:58 am, Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#90539] Re: [ANN] Ruby/Extensions v0.3 released — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/01/24

On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 11:13:35 +0900, T. Onoma wrote:

[#90560] Re: [ANN] Ruby/Extensions v0.3 released — Mark <msparshatt@...> 2004/01/24

Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#90550] Re: [ANN] Ruby/Extensions v0.3 released — "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@...> 2004/01/24

On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#90555] Re: [ANN] Ruby/Extensions v0.3 released — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2004/01/24

On Saturday 24 January 2004 04:44 am, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#90502] Re: [ANN] Ruby/Extensions v0.3 released — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/01/23

Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#90533] Re: [ANN] Ruby/Extensions v0.3 released — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/01/24

On Saturday, January 24, 2004, 3:58:49 AM, Hal wrote:

[#90551] Re: [ANN] Ruby/Extensions v0.3 released — "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@...> 2004/01/24

On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#90563] Re: [ANN] Ruby/Extensions v0.3 released — Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...> 2004/01/24

On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 21:57:13 -0700, Ara.T.Howard wrote:

[#90658] Re: [ANN] Ruby/Extensions v0.3 released — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/01/26

On Saturday, January 24, 2004, 9:10:06 PM, Simon wrote:

[#90568] Re: [ANN] Ruby/Extensions v0.3 released — gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com> 2004/01/24

il Sat, 24 Jan 2004 09:02:10 +0900, Gavin Sinclair

[#90586] Re: [ANN] Ruby/Extensions v0.3 released — Gavin Kistner <gavin@...> 2004/01/24

Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#90587] Re: [ANN] Ruby/Extensions v0.3 released — Gavin Kistner <gavin@...> 2004/01/24

Gavin Kistner wrote:

[#90601] Re: [ANN] Ruby/Extensions v0.3 released — Florian Gross <flgr@...> 2004/01/25

Gavin Kistner wrote:

[#90473] Usage of 'super' — Michael Weller <michael@...>

Hi!

11 messages 2004/01/23

[#90477] Re: [BEGINNER] Usage of 'super' — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/23

[#90481] Re: [BEGINNER] Usage of 'super' — Michael Weller <michael@...> 2004/01/23

Robert Klemme schrieb:

[#90483] Re: [BEGINNER] Usage of 'super' — ts <decoux@...> 2004/01/23

>>>>> "M" == Michael Weller <michael@gutschi.de> writes:

[#90487] Re: [BEGINNER] Usage of 'super' — Michael Weller <michael@...> 2004/01/23

ts schrieb:

[#90484] Re: [BEGINNER] Usage of 'super' — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/23

[#90486] Re: [BEGINNER] Usage of 'super' — Michael Weller <michael@...> 2004/01/23

Robert Klemme schrieb:

[#90474] Re: [BEGINNER] Usage of 'super' — ts <decoux@...> 2004/01/23

>>>>> "M" == Michael Weller <michael@gutschi.de> writes:

[#90476] Re: [BEGINNER] Usage of 'super' — Michael Weller <michael@...> 2004/01/23

ts schrieb:

[#90479] Re: [BEGINNER] Usage of 'super' — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/01/23

Hi --

[#90482] Re: [BEGINNER] Usage of 'super' — Daniel Kelley <news-1074866593@...> 2004/01/23

[#90475] Formation of Atlanta Ruby User Group — Joey Gibson <joey@...>

I'm currently forming the Atlanta Ruby User Group (AtlRUG) and I wanted

1 message 2004/01/23

[#90485] they used to be the only ones. — "Ruby-math-ctl" <drivehushing@...>

The first worth substitute of all existing men`s remedies!

1 message 2004/01/23

[#90488] Problems with resolv.rb && Queue/Thread — "James F. Hranicky" <jfh@...>

Platform: Solaris 8

3 messages 2004/01/23

[#90496] Re: Problems with resolv.rb && Queue/Thread — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/23

[#90498] Re: Problems with resolv.rb && Queue/Thread — "James F. Hranicky" <jfh@...> 2004/01/23

On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 00:44:58 +0900

[#90491] FXRuby: adding child widgets after #run has started — Yuri Leikind <y.leikind@...>

Hello all,

5 messages 2004/01/23

[#90494] Re: FXRuby: adding child widgets after #run has started — Lyle Johnson <lyle@...> 2004/01/23

Yuri Leikind wrote:

[#90520] Re: FXRuby: adding child widgets after #run has started — Yuri Leikind <y.leikind@...> 2004/01/23

On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 00:29:58 +0900

[#90546] Re: FXRuby: adding child widgets after #run has started — Lyle Johnson <lyle@...> 2004/01/24

[#90662] Re: FXRuby: adding child widgets after #run has started — Yuri Leikind <y.leikind@...> 2004/01/26

On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 13:50:06 +0900

[#90493] puts(derived_from_array) — "Ara.T.Howard" <Ara.T.Howard@...>

1 message 2004/01/23

[#90495] Regular Expressions — Rove Monteux <rove.monteux@...>

Hi there,

10 messages 2004/01/23

[#90545] Re: Regular Expressions — Gavin Kistner <gavin@...> 2004/01/24

Rove Monteux wrote:

[#90572] Re: Regular Expressions — Michael campbell <michael_s_campbell@...> 2004/01/24

Gavin Kistner wrote:

[#90639] Status of qurl.org? (Was: Regular Expressions) — "Josef 'Jupp' SCHUGT" <jupp@...> 2004/01/25

Hi!

[#90645] Re: Status of qurl.org? (Was: Regular Expressions) — Michael campbell <michael_s_campbell@...> 2004/01/25

Josef 'Jupp' SCHUGT wrote:

[#90499] Re: Regular Expressions — "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@...> 2004/01/23

On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Rove Monteux wrote:

[#90503] Re: Regular Expressions — Nikolai Weibull <ruby-talk@...> 2004/01/23

* Ara.T.Howard <ahoward@fattire.ngdc.noaa.gov> [Jan, 23 2004 17:20]:

[#90501] Re: Regular Expressions — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2004/01/23

Quoteing ahoward@fattire.ngdc.noaa.gov, on Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 01:04:57AM +0900:

[#90506] Re: Regular Expressions — Rove Monteux <rove.monteux@...> 2004/01/23

Hi,

[#90497] Re: Regular Expressions — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/23

[#90500] $stdout vs. $defout what's the difference? — google@... (John W. Long)

In irb:

3 messages 2004/01/23

[#90660] Re: $stdout vs. $defout what's the difference? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/01/26

Hi,

[#90676] Re: $stdout vs. $defout what's the difference? — google@... (John W. Long) 2004/01/26

matz@ruby-lang.org (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote in message news:<1075105669.891034.1141.nullmailer@picachu.netlab.jp>...

[#90504] using open3.rb from a thread — Yuri Leikind <y.leikind@...>

Hello all,

2 messages 2004/01/23

[#90511] Re: using open3.rb from a thread — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/01/23

Yuri Leikind wrote:

[#90505] Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — Patrick Bennett <patrick.bennett@...>

I find it immensely useful when dealing with arrays to be able to

25 messages 2004/01/23

[#90507] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — Gennady <gfb@...> 2004/01/23

Patrick Bennett wrote:

[#90510] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — Patrick Bennett <patrick.bennett@...> 2004/01/23

Hmmm, thanks, but it's a bit 'non-obvious' to casual Ruby programmers

[#90512] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — Gennady <gfb@...> 2004/01/23

[#90521] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — Linus Sellberg <linse428@...> 2004/01/23

> I would not call "to_a" very obvious, as compared to, say, "to_array"

[#90522] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — Patrick Bennett <patrick.bennett@...> 2004/01/23

Linus Sellberg wrote:

[#90524] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2004/01/23

On Friday 23 January 2004 06:43 pm, Gennady wrote:

[#90526] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — Gennady <gfb@...> 2004/01/23

T. Onoma wrote:

[#90528] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2004/01/23

On Friday 23 January 2004 10:37 pm, Gennady wrote:

[#90542] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/01/24

Hi,

[#90543] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — Patrick Bennett <patrick.bennett@...> 2004/01/24

Ah, thanks! I see that it returns the object as-is if it's already an

[#90556] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/01/24

Hi,

[#90557] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — Patrick Bennett <patrick.bennett@...> 2004/01/24

[#90702] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2004/01/26

On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 04:15:12PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#90712] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/01/26

On Tuesday, January 27, 2004, 7:15:08 AM, Paul wrote:

[#90570] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — Dan Janowski <danj@3skel.com> 2004/01/24

On Jan 23, 2004, at 11:19 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#90571] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — Dan Janowski <danj@3skel.com> 2004/01/24

On Jan 23, 2004, at 11:19 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#90626] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/01/25

Hi,

[#90514] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/01/23

Gennady wrote:

[#90517] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — Gennady <gfb@...> 2004/01/23

Joel VanderWerf wrote:

[#90534] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — Michael Vondung <mvondung@...> 2004/01/24

On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 02:25:59 +0900, Patrick Bennett

[#90535] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — "Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@...> 2004/01/24

On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 01:17:20AM +0100, Michael Vondung wrote:

[#90552] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — "T. Onoma" <transami@...> 2004/01/24

On Saturday 24 January 2004 01:29 am, Mark J. Reed wrote:

[#90576] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2004/01/24

[#90581] Re: Why is to_a going to be obsolete? — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/01/24

daz wrote:

[#90513] detecting default parameters — Ian Macdonald <ian@...>

Hello,

6 messages 2004/01/23

[#90529] Re: detecting default parameters — intc_ctor@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/01/23

Ian Macdonald <ian@caliban.org> wrote in message news:<20040123174504.GY27623@caliban.org>...

[#90527] Re: detecting default parameters — Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...> 2004/01/23

On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 02:45:07 +0900, Ian Macdonald wrote:

[#90548] Re: detecting default parameters — nobu.nokada@... 2004/01/24

Hi,

[#90554] Re: detecting default parameters — "Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@...> 2004/01/24

On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 02:03:52PM +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#90564] Re: detecting default parameters — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2004/01/24

On Sat 24 Jan 2004 at 14:03:52 +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#90519] turning a hash into an array — David Garamond <lists@...6.isreserved.com>

While reading the archives, I found out about this cool "idiom":

3 messages 2004/01/23

[#90553] Re: turning a hash into an array — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/01/24

In article <401169B2.7000503@zara.6.isreserved.com>,

[#90664] Re: turning a hash into an array — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/26

[#90525] Racc and JRuby — Daniel Carrera <dcarrera@...>

Hi all,

2 messages 2004/01/23

[#90558] Re: Racc and JRuby — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/01/24

On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 06:31:08AM +0900, Daniel Carrera wrote:

[#90530] Re: detecting default parameters — Daniel Doel <daniel.doel@...>

Ian Macdonald wrote:

2 messages 2004/01/23

[#90531] Re: detecting default parameters — Gennady <gfb@...> 2004/01/23

Daniel Doel wrote:

[#90559] RubyGems news? — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson)

After RubyConf2002 some people decided that a package

6 messages 2004/01/24

[#90579] Re: RubyGems news? — sera@... (Francis Hwang) 2004/01/24

You can see the RubyGems documentation at

[#90594] Re: RubyGems news? — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2004/01/25

(reply at the bottom)

[#90607] Re: RubyGems news? — sera@... (Francis Hwang) 2004/01/25

Chad Fowler <chad@chadfowler.com> wrote in message news:

[#90636] Re: RubyGems news? — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2004/01/25

Quoteing sera@fhwang.net, on Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 03:59:57PM +0900:

[#90573] Re: RubyGems news? — Dan Janowski <danj@3skel.com> 2004/01/24

[#90561] nuby: determine method passed and determine the receiver that rec eived the method — "Pe, Botp" <botp@...>

Hi Friends,

3 messages 2004/01/24

[#90562] Re: nuby: determine method passed and determine the receiver that rec eived the method — Dan Doel <djd15@...> 2004/01/24

Pe, Botp wrote:

[#90588] Re: determine method passed and determine the receiver that received the method — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/24

[#90565] Re: nuby: determine method passed and determine the receiver that rec eived the method — "Pe, Botp" <botp@...>

Dan Doel [mailto:djd15@po.cwru.edu] humbly replied/asked:

3 messages 2004/01/24

[#90566] Re: nuby: determine method passed and determine the receiver that rec eived the method — Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...> 2004/01/24

On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 19:47:20 +0900, Pe, Botp wrote:

[#90567] Re: nuby: determine method passed and determine the receiver that rec eived the method — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/01/24

On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 07:47:20PM +0900, "Pe, Botp" wrote:

[#90574] cgi.rb params initialize_query() — Dan Janowski <danj@3skel.com>

I assert that initialize_query is broken. CGI::parse should _always_ be

3 messages 2004/01/24

[#90575] Re: cgi.rb params initialize_query() — Aredridel <aredridel@...> 2004/01/24

On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 12:30:57AM +0900, Dan Janowski wrote:

[#90577] Re: cgi.rb params initialize_query() — Dan Janowski <danj@3skel.com> 2004/01/24

cgi params are always an array of values for a given key. A variety of

[#90589] Re: determine method passed and determine the receiver that received the method — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...>

9 messages 2004/01/24

[#90592] Re: determine method passed and determine the receiver that received the method — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/01/24

On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 05:04:58AM +0900, Robert Klemme wrote:

[#90665] Blocks as Block / Proc parameters — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/26

[#90671] Re: Blocks as Block / Proc parameters — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/01/26

[#90673] Re: Blocks as Block / Proc parameters — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/01/26

On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 07:55:00PM +0900, Robert Klemme wrote:

[#90674] Re: Blocks as Block / Proc parameters — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/26

[#90625] Re: determine method passed and determine the receiver that received the method — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/25

[#90629] Re: determine method passed and determine the receiver that received the method — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/01/25

On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 10:14:56PM +0900, Robert Klemme wrote:

[#90672] Re: Blocks as Block / Proc parameters — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/26

[#90591] dime - distributed monitoring environment — "Andre Nathan" <andre@...>

Hello

1 message 2004/01/24

[#90593] Fresh RDoc install can't find HTML template — Jim Menard <jimm@...>

When I run RDoc on any of my projects, I see the following error at the end of

2 messages 2004/01/25

[#90603] Re: Fresh RDoc install can't find HTML template — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/01/25

[#90595] OT: Haskell software? — Jamis Buck <jgb3@...>

This isn't really Ruby-oriented, but with the many times I've heard

5 messages 2004/01/25

[#92501] Re: OT: Haskell software? — ser@... (Sean Russell) 2004/02/09

Jamis Buck <jgb3@email.byu.edu> wrote in message news:<401322F4.1040301@email.byu.edu>...

[#90596] Re: OT: Haskell software? — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...> 2004/01/25

On Jan 24, 2004, at 21:02, Jamis Buck wrote:

[#90597] Re: OT: Haskell software? — Dan Doel <djd15@...> 2004/01/25

You might want to check around here:

[#90631] Re: OT: Haskell software? — Jamis Buck <jgb3@...> 2004/01/25

Dan Doel wrote:

[#90598] perl bug File::Basename and Perl's nature — xah@... (Xah Lee)

Just bumped into another irresponsibility in perl.

19 messages 2004/01/25

[#90599] Re: perl bug File::Basename and Perl's nature — Thomas Adam <thomas_adam16@...> 2004/01/25

--- Xah Lee <xah@xahlee.org> wrote:

[#90600] Re: perl bug File::Basename and Perl's nature — Tim Bates <tim@...> 2004/01/25

On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, [iso-8859-1] Thomas Adam wrote:

[#90605] Re: perl bug File::Basename and Perl's nature — Michael campbell <michael_s_campbell@...> 2004/01/25

Tim Bates wrote:

[#90611] Re: perl bug File::Basename and Perl's nature — michele.simionato@... (Michele Simionato) 2004/01/25

xah@xahlee.org (Xah Lee) wrote in message news:<7fe97cc4.0401242131.22acf485@posting.google.com>...

[#90624] Re: perl bug File::Basename and Perl's nature — "gnari" <gnari@...> 2004/01/25

"Xah Lee" <xah@xahlee.org> wrote in message

[#90627] Re: perl bug File::Basename and Perl's nature — Thomas Adam <thomas_adam16@...> 2004/01/25

--- gnari <gnari@simnet.is> wrote:

[#90638] Re: perl bug File::Basename and Perl's nature — Michele Dondi <bik.mido@...> 2004/01/25

On 24 Jan 2004 21:31:36 -0800, xah@xahlee.org (Xah Lee) wrote:

[#90652] Re: perl bug File::Basename and Perl's nature — Joe Mason <joe@...> 2004/01/26

In article <tmqa10d6a542ma6k1ao6tnupvj0gbtser7@4ax.com>, Michele Dondi wrote:

[#90739] Re: perl bug File::Basename and Perl's nature — "Tassilo v. Parseval" <tassilo.parseval@...> 2004/01/27

[ F'up set ]

[#90604] Re: perl bug File::Basename and Perl's nature — roberson@... (Walter Roberson) 2004/01/25

In article <7fe97cc4.0401242131.22acf485@posting.google.com>,

[#90696] Re: perl bug File::Basename and Perl's nature — "Josef 'Jupp' SCHUGT" <jupp@...> 2004/01/26

Hi!

[#90608] Re: perl bug File::Basename and Perl's nature — yf110@...1.victoria.tc.ca (Malcolm Dew-Jones) 2004/01/25

Xah Lee (xah@xahlee.org) wrote:

[#90654] Re: perl bug File::Basename and Perl's nature — "Matt Garrish" <matthew.garrish@...> 2004/01/26

[#90659] Re: perl bug File::Basename and Perl's nature — Michele Dondi <bik.mido@...> 2004/01/26

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 20:45:19 +0100, I wrote:

[#90685] Re: perl bug File::Basename and Perl's nature — xah@... (Xah Lee) 2004/01/26

just a few notes to wrap this thread up.

[#90698] Re: perl bug File::Basename and Perl's nature — Thomas Adam <thomas_adam16@...> 2004/01/26

--- Xah Lee <xah@xahlee.org> wrote:

[#90689] Re: perl bug File::Basename and Perl's nature — roberson@... (Walter Roberson) 2004/01/26

In article <7fe97cc4.0401260943.2442ba4e@posting.google.com>,

[#90732] Re: perl bug File::Basename and Perl's nature — xah@... (Xah Lee) 2004/01/27

a correction to my previous post.

[#90602] Keyword arguments in Ruby — grom_3@... (grom)

Is it possbile for Ruby to have keyword arguments added in like in

5 messages 2004/01/25

[#90609] Re: Keyword arguments in Ruby — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/01/25

On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 03:09:58PM +0900, grom wrote:

[#90632] Re: Keyword arguments in Ruby — Michael campbell <michael_s_campbell@...> 2004/01/25

Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:

[#90610] Re: Keyword arguments in Ruby — gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com> 2004/01/25

il 24 Jan 2004 22:09:53 -0800, grom_3@optusnet.com.au (grom) ha

[#90622] Re: Keyword arguments in Ruby — gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com> 2004/01/25

il 24 Jan 2004 22:09:53 -0800, grom_3@optusnet.com.au (grom) ha

[#90606] La chance de votre vie — "Marc" <Marc_X4@...>

Faite de l'argent facilement avec un commerce internet paliers multiples.

2 messages 2004/01/25

[#90694] SPAM (Was: La chance de votre vie) — "Josef 'Jupp' SCHUGT" <jupp@...> 2004/01/26

Hi!

[#90612] Constant inheritance — David Heinemeier Hansson <david@...>

Is there anyway to let a subclass overwrite a constant in the

10 messages 2004/01/25

[#90614] Re: Constant inheritance — Jim Driscoll <j@...> 2004/01/25

[#90616] Re: Constant inheritance — David Heinemeier Hansson <david@...> 2004/01/25

> You could just use a class variable (e.g. @@x) instead, the downside

[#90618] Re: Constant inheritance — Jim Driscoll <j@...> 2004/01/25

[#90620] Re: Constant inheritance — David Heinemeier Hansson <david@...> 2004/01/25

> Okay, try this then (referring explicitly to the current namespace):

[#90619] Re: Constant inheritance — Dan Doel <djd15@...> 2004/01/25

Actually, this is better accomplished with class instance variables:

[#90635] Re: Constant inheritance — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/01/25

David Heinemeier Hansson wrote:

[#90617] Re: Constant inheritance — Dan Doel <djd15@...> 2004/01/25

class A

[#90628] Re: Constant inheritance — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/25

[#90651] Re: Constant inheritance — Joe Mason <joe@...> 2004/01/26

In article <0AB1E374-4F2A-11D8-84B3-000A958E6254@loudthinking.com>, David Heinemeier Hansson wrote:

[#90613] Running a specific test in a suite from the command-line — David Heinemeier Hansson <david@...>

I remember being able to write "ruby my_test_suite.rb

3 messages 2004/01/25

[#90615] Re: Running a specific test in a suite from the command-line — David Heinemeier Hansson <david@...> 2004/01/25

> Was this taken out for a specific reason or am I missing something?

[#90634] Re: Running a specific test in a suite from the command-line — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...> 2004/01/25

On Jan 25, 2004, at 06:26, David Heinemeier Hansson wrote:

[#90621] attr_accessor/_reader/_writer and method_defined? — David Garamond <lists@...6.isreserved.com>

Why does a method defined using attr_accessor/_reader/_writer is not

2 messages 2004/01/25

[#90623] Re: attr_accessor/_reader/_writer and method_defined? — Dan Doel <djd15@...> 2004/01/25

My guess:

[#90630] Simple Tk Menu — Gioachino <developers@...>

Hi all!

2 messages 2004/01/25

[#90657] Re: Simple Tk Menu — Voltaire <volty_x@...> 2004/01/26

Gioachino wrote:

[#90640] Regurgitating the contents of a file — Philip Mak <pmak@...>

What's the shortest way to regurgitate the contents of a file? I mean

10 messages 2004/01/25

[#90647] Re: Regurgitating the contents of a file — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/01/26

Philip Mak wrote:

[#90695] Re: Regurgitating the contents of a file — "Josef 'Jupp' SCHUGT" <jupp@...> 2004/01/26

Hi!

[#90697] Re: Regurgitating the contents of a file — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/01/26

Josef 'Jupp' SCHUGT wrote:

[#90701] Re: Regurgitating the contents of a file — "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@...> 2004/01/26

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Joel VanderWerf wrote:

[#90642] Re: Regurgitating the contents of a file — Daniel Carrera <dcarrera@...> 2004/01/25

On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 08:07:46AM +0900, Philip Mak wrote:

[#90643] Re: Regurgitating the contents of a file — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2004/01/25

If you don't want the whole file in-memory, maybe look at copy_stream

[#90666] Re: Regurgitating the contents of a file — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/26

[#90682] Re: Regurgitating the contents of a file — gedb@... (Ged) 2004/01/26

Philip Mak <pmak@aaanime.net> wrote in message news:<20040125230811.GG5772@lina.aaanime.net>...

[#90686] Re: Regurgitating the contents of a file — intc_ctor@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/01/26

Philip Mak <pmak@aaanime.net> wrote in message news:<20040125230811.GG5772@lina.aaanime.net>...

[#90641] Problem with Ruby 1.8.1 on FreeBSD 3.2 — ppi@...

I installed Ruby 1.8.1 from source on FreeBSD 3.2.

3 messages 2004/01/25

[#90644] Re: Problem with Ruby 1.8.1 on FreeBSD 3.2 — Rasputin <rasputnik@...> 2004/01/25

ppi@amug.org wrote:

[#90648] Re: Problem with Ruby 1.8.1 on FreeBSD 3.2 — ppi@... 2004/01/26

On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 08:51:14AM +0900, Rasputin <rasputnik@hellooperator.net> wrote:

[#90646] Re: nuby: determine method passed and determine the receiver that rec eived the method — "Pe, Botp" <botp@...>

Simon Strandgaard [mailto:neoneye@adslhome.dk] advises:

2 messages 2004/01/25

[#90675] Re: nuby: determine method passed and determine the receiver that rec eived the method — Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...> 2004/01/26

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 08:55:15 +0900, Pe, Botp wrote:

[#90649] Ruby-GraphViz — "gregoire.lejeune" <gregoire.lejeune@...>

Hi all,

1 message 2004/01/26

[#90650] Ruby DBD MySQL seg faults under mod_ruby — "matthew c. mead" <mmead@...>

I have an rhtml website using mysql as a backend working

3 messages 2004/01/26

[#90653] Re: Ruby DBD MySQL seg faults under mod_ruby — "matthew c. mead" <mmead@...> 2004/01/26

I know. Bad form to respond to myself.

[#90656] Re: Ruby DBD MySQL seg faults under mod_ruby — "matthew c. mead" <mmead@...> 2004/01/26

For anyone going to take a look at this, I've found it fails

[#90655] Re: nuby: determine method passed and determine the receiver that rec eived the method — "Pe, Botp" <botp@...>

4 messages 2004/01/26

[#90661] Re: nuby: determine method passed and determine the receiver that rec eived the method — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/01/26

On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 12:02:11PM +0900, "Pe, Botp" wrote:

[#90740] Re: nuby: determine method passed and determine the receiver that rec eived the method — "Zachary P. Landau" <kapheine@...> 2004/01/27

> # keep this secret :P

[#90753] Re: nuby: determine method passed and determine the receiver that rec eived the method — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/01/27

On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 04:40:59PM +0900, Zachary P. Landau wrote:

[#90663] Re: nuby: determine method passed and determine the receiver that rec eived the method — "Pe, Botp" <botp@...>

Mauricio Fern疣dez [mailto:batsman.geo@yahoo.com] aka batsman humbly replied

1 message 2004/01/26

[#90667] ruby-math and "why is ** not abelian?" — vanjac12@... (Van Jacques)

I was reading the 1st thread in the ruby-math discussion at

11 messages 2004/01/26

[#90857] Re: ruby-math and "why is ** not abelian?" — vanjac12@... (Van Jacques) 2004/01/28

"Josef 'Jupp' SCHUGT" <jupp@gmx.de> wrote in message news:<20040126221508.GD3659@jupp%gmx.de>...

[#90984] Re: ruby-math and "why is ** not abelian?" — "Josef 'Jupp' SCHUGT" <jupp@...> 2004/01/29

Hi!

[#90668] Re: ruby-math and "why is ** not abelian?" — Peter Hickman <peter@...> 2004/01/26

Van Jacques wrote:

[#90670] Re: ruby-math and "why is ** not abelian?" — Emmanuel Touzery <emmanuel.touzery@...> 2004/01/26

Peter Hickman wrote:

[#90669] Re: ruby-math and "why is ** not abelian?" — Emmanuel Touzery <emmanuel.touzery@...> 2004/01/26

Van Jacques wrote:

[#90725] Re: ruby-math and "why is ** not abelian?" — "Josef 'Jupp' SCHUGT" <jupp@...> 2004/01/27

Hi!

[#90726] OT: Re: ruby-math and "why is ** not abelian?" — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/01/27

Josef 'Jupp' SCHUGT wrote:

[#90710] Re: ruby-math and "why is ** not abelian?" — Stefan Schmiedl <s@...> 2004/01/26

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 21:06:51 +0900,

[#90864] Re: ruby-math and "why is ** not abelian?" — timsuth@... (Tim Sutherland) 2004/01/28

In article <70ae81fd.0401280234.cb1f380@posting.google.com>, Van Jacques wrote:

[#90858] Re: ruby-math and "why is ** not abelian?" — vanjac12@... (Van Jacques) 2004/01/28

BTW, I found that my link to the ruby-math site did not work for me. But

[#90679] Print empty values to a file? — qubert@... (Qubert)

I am in the middle of writing a wrapper to FORTRAN programs using

7 messages 2004/01/26

[#90687] Re: Print empty values to a file? — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/26

[#90902] Re: Print empty values to a file? — qubert@... (Qubert) 2004/01/28

Thank all of you very much. This group offers a wealth of

[#90680] Re: Print empty values to a file? — Lyle Johnson <lyle@...> 2004/01/26

Qubert wrote:

[#90681] Re: Print empty values to a file? — Steve Tuckner <STUCKNER@...> 2004/01/26

If you are just outputing numbers and strings and nil, then you can just put

[#90684] Re: Print empty values to a file? — "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@...> 2004/01/26

On 26 Jan 2004, Qubert wrote:

[#90688] Re: Print empty values to a file? — mike@... (Mike Stok) 2004/01/26

In article <ae5c96cb.0401260829.63d13a13@posting.google.com>,

[#90683] amrita-nuby question: generate "id=" — hvs1@... (Harry)

Hi,

3 messages 2004/01/26

[#90691] Re: amrita-nuby question: generate "id=" — "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@...> 2004/01/26

On 26 Jan 2004, Harry wrote:

[#90690] Re: amrita-nuby question: generate "id=" — Samuel Kvarnbrink <samuel@...> 2004/01/26

Since the "id" attribute has a special meaning for Amrita itself, you

[#90693] rdoc and hyperlinks — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>

For some reason, my rdoc installation isn't generating hyperlinks for

9 messages 2004/01/26

[#90911] Re: rdoc and hyperlinks — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2004/01/29

I thought "hyperlinks, rdoc can do that now? cool!" and updated to the latest

[#90912] Re: rdoc and hyperlinks — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2004/01/29

Ack, forget this.

[#90920] Re: rdoc and hyperlinks — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/01/29

Sam Roberts wrote:

[#90922] Re: rdoc and hyperlinks — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/01/29

Joel VanderWerf wrote:

[#90925] Re: rdoc and hyperlinks — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/01/29

[#90928] Re: rdoc and hyperlinks — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/01/29

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#90935] Re: rdoc and hyperlinks — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2004/01/29

Quoteing vjoel@PATH.Berkeley.EDU, on Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 03:01:45PM +0900:

[#90936] Re: rdoc and hyperlinks — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/01/29

[#90699] def foo[](x) — Gavin Kistner <gavin@...>

#Works

14 messages 2004/01/26

[#90704] Re: def foo[](x) — Jamis Buck <jgb3@...> 2004/01/26

Gavin Kistner wrote:

[#90703] Re: def foo[](x) — gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com> 2004/01/26

il Mon, 26 Jan 2004 19:50:26 GMT, Gavin Kistner <gavin@refinery.com>

[#90711] Re: def foo[](x) — Dan Doel <djd15@...> 2004/01/26

Acutally, this might be better:

[#90705] Re: def foo[](x) — David Heinemeier Hansson <david@...> 2004/01/26

> ....without having to create a new class for bar and define the []

[#90715] Re: def foo[](x) — Gavin Kistner <gavin@...> 2004/01/26

David Heinemeier Hansson wrote:

[#90717] Re: def foo[](x) — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/01/26

Gavin Kistner wrote:

[#90719] Re: def foo[](x) — Gavin Kistner <gavin@...> 2004/01/26

Joel VanderWerf wrote:

[#90721] Re: def foo[](x) — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/01/26

Gavin Kistner wrote:

[#90722] Re: def foo[](x) — Gavin Kistner <gavin@...> 2004/01/26

Gavin Kistner wrote:

[#90728] Re: def foo[](x) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/01/27

Hi,

[#90760] Re: def foo[](x) — Gavin Kistner <gavin@...> 2004/01/27

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#90775] Re: def foo[](x) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/01/27

Hi,

[#90744] Re: def foo[](x) — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/27

[#90700] compiling ruby-1.8.1 + official ruby installer for win? — KONTRA Gergely <kgergely@...>

Hi!

1 message 2004/01/26

[#90706] programming languages — KONTRA Gergely <kgergely@...>

Hi!

4 messages 2004/01/26

[#90708] Re: programming languages — gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com> 2004/01/26

il Tue, 27 Jan 2004 05:47:17 +0900, KONTRA Gergely

[#90720] Re: programming languages — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...> 2004/01/26

Hello gabriele,

[#90724] Re: programming languages — gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com> 2004/01/26

il Tue, 27 Jan 2004 08:25:30 +0900, Lothar Scholz

[#90707] Mail System Error - Returned Mail — Mail@...

This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason:

1 message 2004/01/26

[#90709] gd-Library & windows — Safran von Twesla <me@...>

Hi,

1 message 2004/01/26

[#90713] Output problem with accented characters — "Luis Paulo Oliveira" <lpoliveira@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2004/01/26

[#90729] Re: Output problem with accented characters — "Josef 'Jupp' SCHUGT" <jupp@...> 2004/01/27

Hi!

[#90714] Server Report — d-lewart@...

The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as a binary attachment.

1 message 2004/01/26

[#90727] Time is now a Bignum — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>

Another consequence of the passing of the middle of the epoch

2 messages 2004/01/27

[#90737] Re: Time is now a Bignum — "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@...> 2004/01/27

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Joel VanderWerf wrote:

[#90733] Ruby9i 0.2.1 released (finally!!) — Jim Cain <list@...>

I have finally revisited this project for the first time since last

1 message 2004/01/27

[#90734] Is there a way to control Windows Media Player with ruby? — <agemoagemo@...>

I *think* I've seen something that suggests it can be

2 messages 2004/01/27

[#90738] Re: Is there a way to control Windows Media Player with ruby? — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/01/27

In article <20040127041555.33468.qmail@web14010.mail.yahoo.com>,

[#90735] storing message in exception object — David Garamond <lists@...6.isreserved.com>

I found myself using exception object (instead of ) more and more. They

4 messages 2004/01/27

[#90747] Re: storing message in exception object — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/27

[#90883] Re: storing message in exception object — David Garamond <lists@...6.isreserved.com> 2004/01/28

Robert Klemme wrote:

[#90742] Re: storing message in exception object — David Garamond <lists@...6.isreserved.com> 2004/01/27

David Garamond wrote:

[#90736] mod_ruby and oracle — "Martin Stannard" <martins@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2004/01/27

[#92940] Re: mod_ruby and oracle — martins@... (Martin Stannard) 2004/02/16

"Martin Stannard" <martins@aardvark.net.au> wrote in message news:<53481.203.22.14.128.1075184243.squirrel@www.aardvark.net.au>...

[#90743] Re: perl bug File::Basename and Perl's nature — "Robert McGovern" <robertm@...>

1 message 2004/01/27

[#90746] nuby: can't get an image via http — Guido de Melo <guido.de-melo@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2004/01/27

[#90748] Re: nuby: can't get an image via http — Emmanuel Touzery <emmanuel.touzery@...> 2004/01/27

Guido de Melo wrote:

[#90750] choosing ruby? — Piergiuliano Bossi <p_bossi_AGAINST_SPAM@...>

We are on the way to start a new project, a web application with a bunch

20 messages 2004/01/27

[#90798] rjni — intc_ctor@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/01/27

Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<20040127135223.GB13801@student.ei.uni-stuttgart.de>...

[#90821] Re: rjni — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/01/27

On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 03:09:56AM +0900, Phil Tomson wrote:

[#90882] Re: rjni — intc_ctor@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/01/28

Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<20040127203721.GA1823@student.ei.uni-stuttgart.de>...

[#90888] Re: rjni — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/01/28

On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 02:59:54AM +0900, Phil Tomson wrote:

[#90779] Re: choosing ruby? — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/27

[#90811] Re: choosing ruby? — Don Dwoske <ddwoske@...> 2004/01/27

[#90873] Re: choosing ruby? — Piergiuliano Bossi <p_bossi_AGAINST_SPAM@...> 2004/01/28

Thanks to everybody for your valuable feedback.

[#90874] Not Supported Type Array? — Kirk Haines <khaines@...> 2004/01/28

I am trying to use the OCI8 driver for Oracle with dbi to do some very,

[#90752] Re: choosing ruby? — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/27

[#90755] Re: choosing ruby? — Don Dwoske <ddwoske@...> 2004/01/27

[#90754] Re: choosing ruby? — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/01/27

On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 10:29:56PM +0900, Robert Klemme wrote:

[#90839] Re: choosing ruby? — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/01/28

Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:

[#90959] rjni: using Java from Ruby through JNI (was Re: choosing ruby?) — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/01/29

On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 01:21:37PM +0900, Joel VanderWerf wrote:

[#90960] Re: [ANN] rjni: using Java from Ruby through JNI (was Re: choosing ruby?) — Tom Copeland <tom@...> 2004/01/29

On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 11:34, Mauricio Fern叩ndez wrote:

[#90964] Re: [ANN] rjni: using Java from Ruby through JNI (was Re: choosing ruby?) — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/01/29

On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 01:44:34AM +0900, Tom Copeland wrote:

[#90968] Re: [ANN] rjni: using Java from Ruby through JNI (was Re: choosing ruby?) — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/01/29

On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 02:15:34AM +0900, Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:

[#90840] Re: choosing ruby? — "Zach Dennis" <zdennis@...> 2004/01/28

Release the code!! If you don't have time others may. I may. =)

[#90810] Re: rjni — gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com> 2004/01/27

il 27 Jan 2004 10:07:13 -0800, intc_ctor@yahoo.com (Phil Tomson) ha

[#90906] Re: rjni — intc_ctor@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/01/29

Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<20040128183828.GA24920@student.ei.uni-stuttgart.de>...

[#90751] Re: Proposal for programming language of the year — "john%johnknight.com@..." <john%johnknight.com@...>

1 message 2004/01/27

[#90756] Editor — Safran von Twesla <me@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2004/01/27

[#90759] Re: Editor — E F van de Laar <emiel@...> 2004/01/27

* Safran von Twesla (me@privacy.net) wrote:

[#90761] Re: Editor — "nemo" <nemo@...> 2004/01/27

The windows installer comes with SciTE. I'm happy with it.

[#90762] Re: Editor — "Zach Dennis" <zdennis@...> 2004/01/27

SciTE is great until you find Crimson Editor. http://www.crimsoneditor.com

[#90764] Re: Editor — paul vudmaska <paul@...> 2004/01/27

http://jedit.org

[#90800] Re: Editor — Chris Morris <chrismo@...> 2004/01/27

paul vudmaska wrote:

[#90766] Re: Editor — Safran von Twesla <me@...> 2004/01/27

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:14:35 +0900, "Zach Dennis" <zdennis@mktec.com>

[#90867] Re: Editor — Jussi Jumppanen <jussij@...> 2004/01/28

Sam Roberts wrote:

[#90767] Re: Editor — "Zach Dennis" <zdennis@...> 2004/01/27

Check this link out for your syntax file:

[#90781] Re: Editor — "Curt Hibbs" <curt@...> 2004/01/27

I just downloaded and installed Crimson (v 3.6) and it included Ruby syntax

[#90769] Re: Editor — "nemo" <nemo@...> 2004/01/27

It looks nice, but it doesn't seem to support code folding, nor does it have

[#90777] Re: Editor — "Curt Hibbs" <curt@...> 2004/01/27

nemo wrote:

[#90772] Re: Editor — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2004/01/27

Crimson looks like a less-mature version of textpad (textpad.com).

[#90757] Re: Editor — Thomas Adam <thomas_adam16@...> 2004/01/27

--- Safran von Twesla <me@privacy.net> wrote: > Hi,

[#90771] Re: Editor — Stephan K舂per <Stephan.Kaemper@...> 2004/01/27

Safran von Twesla wrote:

[#90799] Re: Editor — Osuka Adartse <rocioestradacastaneda@...> 2004/01/27

Safran von Twesla wrote:

[#90807] Re: Editor — gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com> 2004/01/27

il Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:10:07 +0900, "nemo" <nemo@hellotree.com> ha

[#90822] Re: Editor — Phil Roberts <philrob@...> 2004/01/27

With total disregard for any kind of safety measures "nemo"

[#90825] Re: Editor — Safran von Twesla <me@...> 2004/01/27

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 03:13:51 +0900, Osuka Adartse

[#90832] Re: Editor — Osuka Adartse <rocioestradacastaneda@...> 2004/01/28

Safran von Twesla wrote:

[#90758] Re: Editor — "Woodhouse, Mike (ANTS)" <mike.woodhouse@...>

Did you look at the Scite editor that's part of the Windows distribution?

1 message 2004/01/27

[#90763] fltk build and doc access problems — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

4 messages 2004/01/27

[#90823] Re: fltk build and doc access problems — ggarramuno@... (GGarramuno) 2004/01/27

Check out the offending lines and surrounding.

[#90824] Re: fltk build and doc access problems — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2004/01/27

On Wednesday, 28 January 2004 at 6:24:57 +0900, GGarramuno wrote:

[#90829] Re: fltk build and doc access problems — ggarramuno@... (GGarramuno) 2004/01/28

Neither.

[#90765] Re: Editor — Michael Campbell <michael_s_campbell@...>

Safran von Twesla wrote:

1 message 2004/01/27

[#90768] checksum with ruby, how? — shasckaw <shasckaw@...>

Hello there, I need help.

7 messages 2004/01/27

[#90835] Re: checksum with ruby, how? — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2004/01/28

[#90837] Re: checksum with ruby, how? — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/01/28

[#90782] Re: checksum with ruby, how? — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/01/27

shasckaw wrote:

[#90784] Re: checksum with ruby, how? — mike@... (Mike Stok) 2004/01/27

In article <40168bd4$0$322$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be>,

[#90827] Re: checksum with ruby, how? — shasckaw <shasckaw@...> 2004/01/27

Mike Stok wrote:

[#90773] Re: checksum with ruby, how? — "Zach Dennis" <zdennis@...> 2004/01/27

On a *Nix machine use the 'md5sum' program to do this.

[#90770] newbee question about "missing" hash methods +, += and << — benny <linux@...>

Hi,

25 messages 2004/01/27

[#90776] Re: newbee question about "missing" hash methods +, += and << — ts <decoux@...> 2004/01/27

>>>>> "b" == benny <linux@marcrenearns.de> writes:

[#90778] Re: newbee question about "missing" hash methods +, += and << — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/01/27

ts wrote:

[#90792] Re: newbee question about "missing" hash methods +, += and << — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2004/01/27

Quoteing hal9000@hypermetrics.com, on Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 01:34:36AM +0900:

[#90780] Re: newbee question about "missing" hash methods +, += and << — ts <decoux@...> 2004/01/27

>>>>> "H" == Hal Fulton <hal9000@hypermetrics.com> writes:

[#90788] Re: newbee question about "missing" hash methods +, += and << — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/01/27

ts wrote:

[#90783] Re: newbee question about "missing" hash methods +, += and << — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/27

[#90786] Re: newbee question about "missing" hash methods +, += and << — benny <linux@...> 2004/01/27

> First of all, no class has a method "+=". Instead this is a syntactic

[#90801] Re: newbee question about "missing" hash methods +, += and << — benny <linux@...> 2004/01/27

[#90812] Re: newbee question about "missing" hash methods +, += and << — benny <linux@...> 2004/01/27

Am Wed, 28 Jan 2004 03:45:35 +0900

[#90815] Re: newbee question about "missing" hash methods +, += and << — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/01/27

benny wrote:

[#90820] Re: newbee question about "missing" hash methods +, += and << — Dan Doel <djd15@...> 2004/01/27

benny wrote:

[#90872] Re: newbee question about "missing" hash methods +, += and << — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/28

[#90787] Re: newbee question about "missing" hash methods +, += and << — benny <linux@...> 2004/01/27

Am Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:39:01 +0900

[#90790] Re: newbee question about "missing" hash methods +, += and << — ts <decoux@...> 2004/01/27

>>>>> "b" == benny <linux@marcrenearns.de> writes:

[#90795] Re: newbee question about "missing" hash methods +, += and << — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/27

[#90796] Re: newbee question about "missing" hash methods +, += and << — benny <linux@...> 2004/01/27

Am Wed, 28 Jan 2004 02:22:05 +0900

[#90797] Re: newbee question about "missing" hash methods +, += and << — ts <decoux@...> 2004/01/27

>>>>> "b" == benny <linux@marcrenearns.de> writes:

[#90802] Re: newbee question about "missing" hash methods +, += and << — benny <linux@...> 2004/01/27

X-Newsreader: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9)

[#90804] Re: newbee question about "missing" hash methods +, += and << — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/01/27

benny wrote:

[#90843] Re: newbee question about "missing" hash methods +, += and << — benny <linux@...> 2004/01/28

Am Wed, 28 Jan 2004 05:15:23 +0900

[#90846] Re: newbee question about "missing" hash methods +, += and << — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/28

[#90849] Re: newbee question about "missing" hash methods +, += and << — benny <linux@...> 2004/01/28

Am Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:27:35 +0100

[#90855] Re: newbee question about "missing" hash methods +, += and << — Dan Doel <djd15@...> 2004/01/28

benny wrote:

[#90863] Re: newbee question about "missing" hash methods +, += and << — benny <linux@...> 2004/01/28

> >

[#90774] ./configure problem — William Sundberg <william@...4trade.com>

uname -a

8 messages 2004/01/27

[#90818] Re: ./configure problem — benny <linux@...> 2004/01/27

[#90785] Re: ./configure problem — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/01/27

Hi,

[#90808] Re: ./configure problem — William Sundberg <william@...4trade.com> 2004/01/27

Thank you for your reply but how do you "try this patch"? Should I add

[#90814] Re: ./configure problem — benny <linux@...> 2004/01/27

Am Wed, 28 Jan 2004 04:02:16 +0900

[#90816] Re: ./configure problem — William Sundberg <william@...4trade.com> 2004/01/27

Thank you again, now I feel even more stupid. I tried with this. Cut out

[#90817] Re: ./configure problem — William Sundberg <william@...4trade.com> 2004/01/27

Sorry my fault, "patch" is a script/pgm I shuld have looked in the old

[#90836] Re: ./configure problem — Daniel Kelley <news-1075254050@...> 2004/01/28

matz@ruby-lang.org (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#90789] Re: choosing ruby? — "Volkmann, Mark" <Mark.Volkmann@...>

I'll second that recommendation for using Maverick.

1 message 2004/01/27

[#90791] Looking for Win32OLE sample code (Tables in Word) — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

2 messages 2004/01/27

[#90819] Re: Looking for Win32OLE sample code (Tables in Word) — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2004/01/27

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Jim Freeze wrote:

[#90793] Re: nuby: can't get an image via http — Emmanuel Touzery <emmanuel.touzery@...>

Hello,

5 messages 2004/01/27

[#91117] Re: nuby: can't get an image via http — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2004/01/31

In article <200401271823.35269.emmanuel.touzery@wanadoo.fr>,

[#91159] Re: nuby: can't get an image via http — Emmanuel Touzery <emmanuel.touzery@...> 2004/02/01

On Saturday 31 of January 2004 21:23, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#91160] Re: nuby: can't get an image via http — Emmanuel Touzery <emmanuel.touzery@...> 2004/02/01

On Sunday 01 of February 2004 11:05, Emmanuel Touzery wrote:

[#91252] Re: nuby: can't get an image via http — Emmanuel Touzery <emmanuel.touzery@...> 2004/02/02

Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#90794] accessing DLL help - Wintel platform — "LeRoy, Brian D." <brian.leroy@...>

I'm having trouble calling an external method from a particular DLL:

1 message 2004/01/27

[#90803] MiniRubyWiki in action? — phlip_cpp@... (Phlip)

Rubies:

5 messages 2004/01/27

[#90813] Re: MiniRubyWiki in action? — Don Dwoske <ddwoske@...> 2004/01/27

[#90830] Re: MiniRubyWiki in action? — "Phlip" <phlip_cpp@...> 2004/01/28

Don Dwoske wrote:

[#90831] Re: MiniRubyWiki in action? — Thomas Adam <thomas_adam16@...> 2004/01/28

--- Phlip <phlip_cpp@yahoo.com> wrote:

[#90850] Re: MiniRubyWiki in action? — mail@... (Rainer Volz) 2004/01/28

phlip_cpp@yahoo.com (Phlip) wrote in message news:<63604d2.0401271042.114d89ff@posting.google.com>...

[#90828] Virus Alert — vcheck-service@...

A virus (WORM_MIMAIL.R in readme.zip) detected in the message you (ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org) sent to sato@rcep.dpri.kyoto-u.ac.jp. The message was forwarded to sato@rcep.dpri.kyoto-u.ac.jp with an action "quarantined".

1 message 2004/01/28

[#90833] RubyForge scheduled maintenance tonight... — Richard Kilmer <rich@...>

RubyForge will be offline from 2100 to 2130 27 Jan EST (0200-0230 28

1 message 2004/01/28

[#90834] Re: nuby: determine method passed and determine the receiver that rec eived the method — "Pe, Botp" <botp@...>

> > # keep this secret :P

2 messages 2004/01/28

[#90851] Re: nuby: determine method passed and determine the receiver that received the method — Dan Doel <djd15@...> 2004/01/28

Pe, Botp wrote:

[#90838] little client & server apps in Ruby for downloading authorized files — Ruby Baby <ruby@...>

I'm about to try a little test project in Ruby, but want to make sure

2 messages 2004/01/28

[#90853] Re: little client & server apps in Ruby for downloading authorized files — Andreas Schwarz <usenet@...> 2004/01/28

Ruby Baby wrote:

[#90841] Virus found in a message you sent — Symantec_AntiVirus_for_SMTP_Gateways@...

A virus was found in a message sent by this

1 message 2004/01/28

[#90842] packing booleans — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>

3 messages 2004/01/28

[#90847] Re: packing booleans — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/28

[#90903] Re: packing booleans — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/01/28

Robert Klemme wrote:

[#90844] ruby-dev summary 22625-22687 — "K.Sasada" <ko1@...>

2 messages 2004/01/28

[#90856] Re: ruby-dev summary 22625-22687 — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2004/01/28

Hi,

[#90845] float types — elathan@...

Hello!

6 messages 2004/01/28

[#90848] Re: float types — ts <decoux@...> 2004/01/28

>>>>> "e" == elathan <elathan@phys.uoa.gr> writes:

[#90852] Re: float types — elathan@... 2004/01/28

Quoting ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr>:

[#90869] Re: float types — Lyle Johnson <lyle@...> 2004/01/28

elathan@phys.uoa.gr wrote:

[#90871] Re: float types — nobu.nokada@... 2004/01/28

Hi,

[#90870] Re: float types — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/01/28

Hi,

[#90854] Re: Looking for Win32OLE sample code (Tables in Word) — "Robert McGovern" <robertm@...>

> require 'win32ole'

2 messages 2004/01/28

[#90868] Re: Looking for Win32OLE sample code (Tables in Word) — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2004/01/28

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Robert McGovern wrote:

[#90859] Does a function like pythons dir() excist for ruby ? — Asbjn Reglund Thorsen <asbjoert@...>

I am using interactive Ruby for quick testing my swigged c++ module. In

3 messages 2004/01/28

[#90861] Re: Does a function like pythons dir() excist for ruby ? — nobu.nokada@... 2004/01/28

Hi,

[#90877] Re: Does a function like pythons dir() excist for ruby ? — gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com> 2004/01/28

il Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:52:35 +0100, Asbjn Reglund Thorsen

[#90862] Your message has been received. — "Sen.Hansen" <Sen.Hansen@...>

Thank you for your recent email.

1 message 2004/01/28

[#90875] Ruby & gd — Safran von Twesla <me@...>

Hi,

10 messages 2004/01/28

[#90901] Re: Ruby & gd — Martin Weber <Ephaeton@...> 2004/01/28

On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 01:54:53AM +0900, Safran von Twesla wrote:

[#90956] Re: Ruby & gd — Rasputin <rasputnik@...> 2004/01/29

Martin Weber wrote:

[#90961] Extensions & rpath [was: Re: Ruby & gd] — Martin Weber <Ephaeton@...> 2004/01/29

On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 01:17:21AM +0900, Rasputin wrote:

[#90878] Re: Ruby & gd — Rasputin <rasputnik@...> 2004/01/28

[#90885] Re: Ruby & gd — Safran von Twesla <me@...> 2004/01/28

On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 02:15:31 +0900, Rasputin

[#90890] Re: Ruby & gd — "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@...> 2004/01/28

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Safran von Twesla wrote:

[#90889] Re: Ruby & gd — mike@... (Mike Stok) 2004/01/28

In article <s1vf10h982mqbthdlmc0eai6frf85flprk@4ax.com>,

[#90898] Re: Ruby & gd — Safran von Twesla <me@...> 2004/01/28

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 18:42:10 GMT, mike@stok.co.uk (Mike Stok) wrote:

[#90904] Re: Ruby & gd — nobu.nokada@... 2004/01/28

Hi,

[#90876] Why does DBI insist on using it's own date/time classes? — David Heinemeier Hansson <david@...>

I can't seem to figure out why DBI uses its own set of date/time

5 messages 2004/01/28

[#90880] Re: Why does DBI insist on using it's own date/time classes? — "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@...> 2004/01/28

On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, David Heinemeier Hansson wrote:

[#90881] Re: Why does DBI insist on using it's own date/time classes? — Nikolai Weibull <ruby-talk@...> 2004/01/28

* Ara.T.Howard <ahoward@fattire.ngdc.noaa.gov> [Jan, 28 2004 18:40]:

[#90905] Re: Why does DBI insist on using it's own date/time classes? — nobu.nokada@... 2004/01/28

Hi,

[#90942] Re: Why does DBI insist on using it's own date/time classes? — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2004/01/29

On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 01:57:43AM +0900, David Heinemeier Hansson wrote:

[#90879] hostname -> www.codeforpeople.com — "Ara.T.Howard" <Ara.T.Howard@...>

2 messages 2004/01/28

[#90887] Re: hostname -> www.codeforpeople.com — "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@...> 2004/01/28

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Ara.T.Howard wrote:

[#90884] Undeliverable message returned to sender —

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

1 message 2004/01/28

[#90886] Re: Ruby & gd — "Christophe Broult" <cbroult@...>

1 message 2004/01/28

[#90891] PK Forum (Pakistani Community) Launched — "Webmaster" <noreply@...>

Dear Sir/Madam

1 message 2004/01/28

[#90892] Type — Noixe@... (Noixe)

Hello,

5 messages 2004/01/28

[#90894] Re: Type — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2004/01/28

On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Noixe wrote:

[#90896] Re: Type — Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...> 2004/01/28

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:35:45 -0800, Noixe wrote:

[#90895] Re: Type — mike@... (Mike Stok) 2004/01/28

In article <cee6b908.0401281235.5d7f1ea8@posting.google.com>,

[#90899] Re: Type — Lyle Johnson <lyle@...> 2004/01/28

Noixe wrote:

[#90893] Re: Type — "Gavri Savio Fernandez" <Gavri_F@...>

> From: Noixe [mailto:Noixe@email.it]

1 message 2004/01/28

[#90900] Re: Type — "Gavri Savio Fernandez" <Gavri_F@...>

> From: Lyle Johnson [mailto:lyle@users.sourceforge.net]

1 message 2004/01/28

[#90907] Redirecting stdout from within a Ruby script. — "David Douthitt" <DDouthitt@...>

I have a script which has been running just fine, and uses stdout to print its data.

2 messages 2004/01/29

[#90908] Re: Redirecting stdout from within a Ruby script. — nobu.nokada@... 2004/01/29

Hi,

[#90910] naif question: ruby and mysql — Mark Probert <probertm@...>

3 messages 2004/01/29

[#91029] Re: naif question: ruby and mysql — timsuth@... (Tim Sutherland) 2004/01/30

In article <Xns947ED3BE6ECA8probertmnospamacmorg@206.172.150.14>, Mark Probert

[#90933] Re: naif question: ruby and mysql — Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...> 2004/01/29

On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 01:48:55 +0000, Mark Probert wrote:

[#90913] vimrc for Ruby or rubytidy — Theodore Knab <tjk@...>

Does someone have a '.vimrc' file they will share

17 messages 2004/01/29

[#90914] Re: vimrc for Ruby or rubytidy — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/01/29

> Does someone have a '.vimrc' file they will share

[#90916] Project: in Ruby, Perl? — "Zach Dennis" <zdennis@...> 2004/01/29

Hi,

[#90946] Re: Project: in Ruby, Perl? — Florian Gross <flgr@...> 2004/01/29

Zach Dennis wrote:

[#90924] Re: Project: in Ruby, Perl? — Theodore Knab <tjk@...> 2004/01/29

Readability and re-usability will be better with Ruby.

[#90927] Re: Project: in Ruby, Perl? — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/01/29

In article <LLENJLJKHAOFKOLPKLAFGEKBCAAA.zdennis@mktec.com>,

[#90938] Re: Project: in Ruby, Perl? — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...> 2004/01/29

Hello Phil,

[#90939] Re: Project: in Ruby, Perl? — Peter Hickman <peter@...> 2004/01/29

Phil Tomson wrote:

[#90930] Re: Project: in Ruby, Perl? — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/29

[#90931] Re: Project: in Ruby, Perl? — Louis M <louis@..._THISmalenica.id.au> 2004/01/29

Zach Dennis wrote:

[#90951] Re: Project: in Ruby, Perl? — "Zach Dennis" <zdennis@...> 2004/01/29

[#90957] Re: Project: in Ruby, Perl? — Rasputin <rasputnik@...> 2004/01/29

Louis M wrote:

[#90932] Re: Project: in Ruby, Perl? — Kirk Haines <khaines@...> 2004/01/29

On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Zach Dennis wrote:

[#90953] Re: Project: in Ruby, Perl? — aero6dof@... (Alan Chen) 2004/01/29

"Zach Dennis" <zdennis@mktec.com> wrote in message news:<LLENJLJKHAOFKOLPKLAFGEKBCAAA.zdennis@mktec.com>...

[#90958] Re: Project: in Ruby, Perl? — Peter Hickman <peter@...> 2004/01/29

Alan Chen wrote:

[#90919] Re: vimrc for Ruby or rubytidy — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/01/29

[#90937] Re: vimrc for Ruby or rubytidy — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2004/01/29

Quoteing gsinclair@soyabean.com.au, on Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 12:05:00PM +0900:

[#90915] I'm... confused — Michael campbell <michael_s_campbell@...>

Given:

3 messages 2004/01/29

[#90918] Re: I'm... confused — nobu.nokada@... 2004/01/29

Hi,

[#90921] Re: I'm... confused — "Zach Dennis" <zdennis@...> 2004/01/29

Michael you are using hash syntax. Hence the =>. If you supply => Ruby

[#90917] Re: I'm... confused — David Naseby <david.naseby@...>

>-----Original Message-----

2 messages 2004/01/29

[#90923] Re: I'm... confused — Michael campbell <michael_s_campbell@...> 2004/01/29

David Naseby wrote:

[#90934] Bignums and return — Andre Nathan <andre@...>

Hello

12 messages 2004/01/29

[#91027] Re: Bignums and return — Jason Hutchens <jason.hutchens@...> 2004/01/30

On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 22:41:42 +0900, Andre Nathan <andre@digirati.com.br>

[#91030] Re: Bignums and return — Andre Nathan <andre@...> 2004/01/30

On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 05:20, Jason Hutchens wrote:

[#91031] Re: Bignums and return — ts <decoux@...> 2004/01/30

>>>>> "A" == Andre Nathan <andre@digirati.com.br> writes:

[#91045] Re: Bignums and return — "Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@...> 2004/01/30

On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 08:05:03PM +0900, ts wrote:

[#91091] Re: Bignums and return — ts <decoux@...> 2004/01/31

>>>>> "M" == Mark J Reed <markjreed@mail.com> writes:

[#91100] Re: Bignums and return — "Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@...> 2004/01/31

On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 10:26:46PM +0900, ts wrote:

[#91270] peephole optimization (Re: Bignums and return) — nobu.nokada@... 2004/02/02

Hi,

[#91356] Re: peephole optimization (Re: Bignums and return) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/02/02

HI,

[#90947] Re: Bignums and return — ts <decoux@...> 2004/01/29

>>>>> "A" == Andre Nathan <andre@digirati.com.br> writes:

[#90962] Re: Bignums and return — Andre Nathan <andre@...> 2004/01/29

On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 12:38, ts wrote:

[#90965] Re: Bignums and return — ts <decoux@...> 2004/01/29

>>>>> "A" == Andre Nathan <andre@digirati.com.br> writes:

[#90940] Virus Alert — Mailscanner@...

The mail message (file: doc.scr) you sent to dsn@srasys.co.in contains a virus. (on the network)

1 message 2004/01/29

[#90941] ruby for wince — ropebu@... (rolf peter)

hi people,

2 messages 2004/01/29

[#90945] Re: ruby for wince — Joey Gibson <joey@...> 2004/01/29

On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, rolf peter wrote:

[#90943] Re: Project: in Ruby, Perl? — Michael Campbell <michael_s_campbell@...>

Theodore Knab wrote:

1 message 2004/01/29

[#90944] Undeliverable message returned to sender —

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

1 message 2004/01/29

[#90948] why won't ruby chomp for me? — Emmanuel Touzery <emmanuel.touzery@...>

Hello,

10 messages 2004/01/29

[#90949] Re: why won't ruby chomp for me? — ts <decoux@...> 2004/01/29

>>>>> "E" == Emmanuel Touzery <emmanuel.touzery@wanadoo.fr> writes:

[#90952] Re: why won't ruby chomp for me? — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...> 2004/01/29

ts wrote:

[#90954] Re: why won't ruby chomp for me? — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2004/01/29

Quoteing steven.jenkins@ieee.org, on Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 12:47:49AM +0900:

[#90950] Re: why won't ruby chomp for me? — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2004/01/29

Quoteing emmanuel.touzery@wanadoo.fr, on Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 12:04:30AM +0900:

[#90970] Re: why won't ruby chomp for me? — Emmanuel Touzery <emmanuel.touzery@...> 2004/01/29

Hello,

[#90955] Re: why won't ruby chomp for me? — mike@... (Mike Stok) 2004/01/29

In article <200401291519.i0TFJ8d15618@moulon.inra.fr>,

[#91001] Re: why won't ruby chomp for me? — Dion Mendel <nsb034@...> 2004/01/30

On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 12:04:30AM +0900, Emmanuel Touzery wrote:

[#91003] Re: why won't ruby chomp for me? — nobu.nokada@... 2004/01/30

Hi,

[#91014] Re: why won't ruby chomp for me? — "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@...> 2004/01/30

On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Dion Mendel wrote:

[#90963] Read-Only Array Access — Gavin Kistner <gavin@...>

While I understand the (very valid) reasons that my RCR [see:

3 messages 2004/01/29

[#90967] Re: Read-Only Array Access — "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@...> 2004/01/29

On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Gavin Kistner wrote:

[#90966] Re: Read-Only Array Access — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/29

[#90969] Re: Redirecting stdout from within a Ruby script. — "David Douthitt" <ddouthitt@...>

Thanks! Yet another reason to love Ruby ;-)

1 message 2004/01/29

[#90971] time comparison — tony summerfelt <snowzone5@...>

i want to parse and trim a log file. the date format log file looks like:

13 messages 2004/01/29

[#90972] Re: time comparison — Guillaume Marcais <guslist@...> 2004/01/29

t3 = t2 - 24 * 2600 * x # - for Time work on the seconds

[#90973] Re: time comparison — Guillaume Marcais <guslist@...> 2004/01/29

With 3600 seconds in an hour, it even works better!

[#90975] Re: time comparison — "Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@...> 2004/01/29

On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 03:51:31AM +0900, Guillaume Marcais wrote:

[#90980] Re: time comparison — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/01/29

Mark J. Reed wrote:

[#90989] Re: time comparison — Guillaume Marcais <guslist@...> 2004/01/29

On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 15:14, Hal Fulton wrote:

[#90974] Re: time comparison — "Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@...> 2004/01/29

[#90990] Re: time comparison — tony summerfelt <snowzone5@...> 2004/01/29

On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 at 18:51 GMT, Guillaume Marcais <guslist@free.fr> wrote:

[#91035] Re: time comparison — YANAGAWA Kazuhisa <kjana@...4lab.to> 2004/01/30

In Message-Id: <TigSb.551$_62.308@read1.cgocable.net>

[#91036] Learning Curve Development Time Question — "Zach Dennis" <zdennis@...> 2004/01/30

I am curious what others have found with a learning and development curve

[#91037] Re: Learning Curve Development Time Question — Rove Monteux <rove.monteux@...> 2004/01/30

Not sure if its inside the topic at all, nor if it will help, posting

[#91038] Re: Learning Curve Development Time Question — Peter Hickman <peter@...> 2004/01/30

Zach Dennis wrote:

[#91039] Re: Learning Curve Development Time Question — "Jim Weirich" <jim@...> 2004/01/30

[#90976] Why is def foo? legal but @foo? illegal? — Gavin Kistner <gavin@...>

Can someone tell me why you can define a method with a question mark in

4 messages 2004/01/29

[#90978] Re: Why is def foo? legal but @foo? illegal? — Chris Morris <chrismo@...> 2004/01/29

Gavin Kistner wrote:

[#90979] Re: Why is def foo? legal but @foo? illegal? — "Zachary P. Landau" <kapheine@...> 2004/01/29

> >....but you can't name an instance variable with one:

[#90993] Re: Why is def foo? legal but @foo? illegal? — Gavin Kistner <gavin@...> 2004/01/29

Chris Morris wrote:

[#90977] Emacs comments — Guillaume Marcais <guillaume.marcais@...>

Given the following piece of code:

3 messages 2004/01/29

[#90991] Re: Emacs comments — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/01/29

Hi,

[#90994] Re: Emacs comments — Guillaume Marcais <guslist@...> 2004/01/29

Works great. Thanks for your quick response.

[#90981] Checking the parameters "type" — "Imobach =?iso-8859-15?q?Gonz=E1lez_Sosa?=" <imodev@...>

Hi all,

4 messages 2004/01/29

[#91000] Re: Checking the parameters "type" — "Josef 'Jupp' SCHUGT" <jupp@...> 2004/01/30

Hi!

[#90987] Re: Checking the parameters "type" — gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com> 2004/01/29

il Fri, 30 Jan 2004 05:44:26 +0900, "Imobach Gonz疝ez Sosa"

[#91069] Re: Checking the parameters "type" — "Imobach Gonz疝ez Sosa" <imodev@...> 2004/01/30

El Jueves, 29 de Enero de 2004 22:44, gabriele renzi escribi

[#90982] Tracery - a ruby interface to ptrace syscall on linux — "Basile Starynkevitch [news]" <basile-news@...>

Dear All,

1 message 2004/01/29

[#90983] wierd cgi behaviour in PP Ruby 1.8.0 — Damphyr <damphyr@...>

Well it's the short calm period before the storm of an upcoming product

3 messages 2004/01/29

[#90985] Re: wierd cgi behaviour in PP Ruby 1.8.0 — walter@... 2004/01/29

> Well it's the short calm period before the storm of an upcoming

[#90986] Re: wierd cgi behaviour in PP Ruby 1.8.0 — Damphyr <damphyr@...> 2004/01/29

walter@mwsewall.com wrote:

[#90988] fallbacks using contiuations — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>

11 messages 2004/01/29

[#91023] Re: fallbacks using contiuations — "Jim Weirich" <jim@...> 2004/01/30

[#91033] Re: fallbacks using contiuations — Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...> 2004/01/30

On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:04:17 +0900, Jim Weirich wrote:

[#91075] Re: fallbacks using contiuations — avi@...4.com (Avi Bryant) 2004/01/31

"Jim Weirich" <jim@weirichhouse.org> wrote in message news:<33737.216.23.36.251.1075442652.squirrel@jimweirich.umlcoop.net>...

[#91080] Re: fallbacks using contiuations — "Jim Weirich" <jim@...> 2004/01/31

[#91081] regex bug? — "Zach Dennis" <zdennis@...> 2004/01/31

key = "file"

[#91083] Re: regex bug? — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/01/31

Zach Dennis wrote:

[#91084] Re: regex bug? — "Zach Dennis" <zdennis@...> 2004/01/31

Thank you much Hal! It's working now.

[#91085] Re: regex bug? — "John W. Long" <ng@...> 2004/01/31

-----"Zach Dennis" wrote:-----

[#91086] Re: regex bug? — "Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@...> 2004/01/31

On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 01:07:42PM +0900, Zach Dennis wrote:

[#91126] Re: regex bug? — mike@... (Mike Stok) 2004/01/31

In article <20040131052700.GA5270@mulan.thereeds.org>,

[#90992] rescue *[] — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>

8 messages 2004/01/29

[#90995] Re: rescue *[] — nobu.nokada@... 2004/01/30

Hi,

[#90997] Re: rescue *[] — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/01/30

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#91002] Re: rescue *[] — nobu.nokada@... 2004/01/30

Hi,

[#91004] Re: rescue *[] — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/01/30

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#91008] Re: rescue *[] — nobu.nokada@... 2004/01/30

Hi,

[#91006] Re: rescue *[] — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/01/30

Hi,

[#91009] Re: rescue *[] — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/01/30

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#90996] amrita and checkboxes — Michael campbell <michael_s_campbell@...>

How does one control whether or not a checkbox is "checked" using amrita? I'm familiar with using the a(:attr => value) form for modifying an attribute WITHIN a tag, but this attribute is either present or absent, it doesn't have a value as such.

2 messages 2004/01/30

[#90999] Re: amrita and checkboxes - solved — Michael campbell <michael_s_campbell@...> 2004/01/30

Michael campbell wrote:

[#90998] Virus Alert — Mailscanner@...

The mail message (file: readme.zip) you sent to stefania@luckynewsletter.com contains a virus. (on the network)

1 message 2004/01/30

[#91005] Ruby and Perl Integration — "John W. Long" <ws@...>

All this talk about RJNI has gotten me thinking. Has anyone attempted to

17 messages 2004/01/30

[#91007] Re: Ruby and Perl Integration — Thomas Adam <thomas_adam16@...> 2004/01/30

--- "John W. Long" <ws@johnwlong.com> wrote:

[#91015] Re: Ruby and Perl Integration — "John W. Long" <ng@...> 2004/01/30

----Lothar Scholz wrote:----

[#91016] Re: Ruby and Perl Integration — Thomas Adam <thomas_adam16@...> 2004/01/30

--- "John W. Long" <ng@johnwlong.com> wrote:

[#91017] Re: Ruby and Perl Integration — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/01/30

In article <4019C0B9.6090207@qiqsolutions.com>,

[#91020] Re: Ruby and Perl Integration — Harry Ohlsen <harryo@...> 2004/01/30

Phil Tomson wrote:

[#91021] Re: Ruby and Perl Integration — Harry Ohlsen <harryo@...> 2004/01/30

By the way, on that page there's a broken link to something called perllib. I did a quick Google and found the following page:

[#91022] Ruby perllib — Harry Ohlsen <harryo@...> 2004/01/30

I found the main web page for perllib here ...

[#91018] Re: Ruby and Perl Integration — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/01/30

In article <010c01c3e6e4$dac1c5d0$6601a8c0@jwldesktop>,

[#91025] Re: Ruby and Perl Integration — gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com> 2004/01/30

il Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:26:06 +0900, Harry Ohlsen

[#91034] Re: Ruby and Perl Integration — sera@... (Francis Hwang) 2004/01/30

Well, it would be one more option, wouldn't it? Right now you have two

[#91048] Re: Ruby and Perl Integration — intc_ctor@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/01/30

sera@fhwang.net (Francis Hwang) wrote in message news:<7b561b93.0401300435.e529572@posting.google.com>...

[#91010] Re: Ruby and Perl Integration — "John W. Long" <ng@...> 2004/01/30

----Thomas Adam wrote:----

[#91012] Re: Ruby and Perl Integration — Harry Ohlsen <harryo@...> 2004/01/30

John W. Long wrote:

[#91013] Re: Ruby and Perl Integration — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...> 2004/01/30

Hello John,

[#91011] Re: Ruby and Perl Integration — "Zach Dennis" <zdennis@...> 2004/01/30

John,

[#91026] Re: Ruby perllib — gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com> 2004/01/30

il Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:39:44 +0900, Harry Ohlsen

[#91019] Net::http.get has a 50K limit? — "Meihua Liang" <mliang@...>

I'm trying to write a screenscraper and am getting a 50K limit on the data

6 messages 2004/01/30

[#91046] Re: Net::http.get has a 50K limit? — "Meihua Liang" <mliang@...> 2004/01/30

Yes the server completes the document. Browser serves it nicely, and I also

[#91060] Re: Net::http.get has a 50K limit? — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/01/30

[#91062] Re: Net::http.get has a 50K limit? — "Meihua Liang" <mliang@...> 2004/01/30

I tried your suggestion (ie. using a block and putting it to a file: see

[#91024] Re: Net::http.get has a 50K limit? — Vivek Nallur <nvivek@...> 2004/01/30

Just a small change required.

[#91076] Re: Net::http.get has a 50K limit? — Daniel Lichtenberger <daniel_usenet@...> 2004/01/31

Hi!

[#91028] Ruby Book — "Useko Netsumi" <usenets_remote_this@...>

Hi, I was wondering if there are any new Ruby book based on Ruby 1.8.x ?

6 messages 2004/01/30

[#91043] Re: Ruby Book — "Useko Netsumi" <usenets_remote_this@...> 2004/01/30

The book that are available now are excellent - easy to follow, have good

[#91032] Re: Ruby Book — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/01/30

Hi,

[#91050] Re: Ruby Book — Gavin Kistner <gavin@...> 2004/01/30

Useko Netsumi wrote:

[#91052] Re: Ruby Book — Gavin Kistner <gavin@...> 2004/01/30

Gavin Kistner wrote:

[#91057] Re: Ruby Book — Lyle Johnson <lyle@...> 2004/01/30

Gavin Kistner wrote:

[#91040] OSCON call for papers — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Last year's O'Reilly Open Source Convention was the first to have a

3 messages 2004/01/30

[#91049] Re: OSCON call for papers — Lyle Johnson <lyle@...> 2004/01/30

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#91095] Re: OSCON call for papers — djberg96@... (Daniel Berger) 2004/01/31

Lyle Johnson <lyle@users.sourceforge.net> wrote in message news:<101ldjts7inka57@corp.supernews.com>...

[#91041] Windows 1.8.1 installer ready — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

rubyinstaller.sourceforge.net now has the latest installer, built for

8 messages 2004/01/30

[#91042] Re: Windows 1.8.1 installer ready — Richard Kilmer <rich@...> 2004/01/30

gee...this should be a RubyForge project ;-)

[#91047] Re: Windows 1.8.1 installer ready — "Useko Netsumi" <usenets_remote_this@...> 2004/01/30

Great! Andrew.

[#91051] Re: Windows 1.8.1 installer ready — Joey Gibson <joey@...> 2004/01/30

On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Andrew Hunt wrote:

[#91054] Re: Windows 1.8.1 installer ready — "Curt Hibbs" <curt@...> 2004/01/30

Joey Gibson wrote:

[#91120] Re: Windows 1.8.1 installer ready — Joey Gibson <joey@...> 2004/01/31

On 1/30/2004 3:41 PM, Curt Hibbs wrote:

[#91077] Re: Windows 1.8.1 installer ready — "John W. Kennedy" <jwkenne@...> 2004/01/31

Andrew Hunt wrote:

[#91082] Re: Windows 1.8.1 installer ready — "Curt Hibbs" <curt@...> 2004/01/31

John W. Kennedy wrote:

[#91044] Webrick URIs to autosearch extension sequence (eg. html, htm, pdf) Howto? — Ralph Amissah <ralph@...>

Question: how to configure webrick to autoload various file extensions where

1 message 2004/01/30

[#91053] Changes to "Programming Ruby" book for 1.8.x — intc_ctor@... (Phil Tomson)

Since the text to Dave & Andy's "Programming Ruby" book is freely

6 messages 2004/01/30

[#91087] Re: Changes to "Programming Ruby" book for 1.8.x — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/01/31

In article <1691601598837.20040131124436@soyabean.com.au>,

[#91092] Re: Changes to "Programming Ruby" book for 1.8.x — Damphyr <damphyr@...> 2004/01/31

Phil Tomson wrote:

[#91055] Re: Changes to "Programming Ruby" book for 1.8.x — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/01/30

[#91078] Re: Changes to "Programming Ruby" book for 1.8.x — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/01/31

On Saturday, January 31, 2004, 7:43:57 AM, Dave wrote:

[#91066] Re: Changes to "Programming Ruby" book for 1.8.x — "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@...> 2004/01/30

On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#91056] principle of most suprise — tony summerfelt <snowzone5@...>

gah, ruby is doing it to me again:

31 messages 2004/01/30

[#92007] Re: principle of most suprise — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/02/08

[#92331] Re: principle of most suprise — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/02/09

[#92413] Re: principle of most suprise — tony summerfelt <snowzone5@...> 2004/02/09

On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 at 09:13 GMT, Robert Klemme <bob.news@gmx.net> wrote:

[#91063] Re: principle of most suprise — Maik Schmidt <contact@...> 2004/01/30

tony summerfelt wrote:

[#91065] Re: principle of most suprise — Dave Lee <davel@...> 2004/01/30

[#91070] Re: principle of most suprise — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/01/30

Dave Lee wrote:

[#91630] Re: principle of most suprise — gedb@... (Ged) 2004/02/05

Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@PATH.Berkeley.EDU> wrote in message news:<401ADCE4.2000209@path.berkeley.edu>...

[#91944] Re: principle of most suprise — gedb@... (Ged) 2004/02/08

Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@PATH.Berkeley.EDU> wrote in message news:<401ADCE4.2000209@path.berkeley.edu>...

[#92133] Re: principle of most suprise — gedb@... (Ged) 2004/02/09

Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@PATH.Berkeley.EDU> wrote in message news:<401ADCE4.2000209@path.berkeley.edu>...

[#92329] Re: principle of most suprise — gedb@... (Ged) 2004/02/09

Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@PATH.Berkeley.EDU> wrote in message news:<401ADCE4.2000209@path.berkeley.edu>...

[#91059] Re: principle of most suprise — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/01/30

tony summerfelt wrote:

[#91058] Re: principle of most suprise — Gennady <gfb@...> 2004/01/30

tony summerfelt wrote:

[#91061] Re: principle of most suprise — "Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@...> 2004/01/30

On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 08:25:08PM +0000, tony summerfelt wrote:

[#91223] Re: principle of most suprise — tony summerfelt <snowzone5@...> 2004/02/01

On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 at 21:24 GMT, Maik Schmidt <contact@maik-schmidt.de> wrote:

[#91254] Re: principle of most suprise — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/02/02

[#91348] Re: principle of most suprise — tony summerfelt <snowzone5@...> 2004/02/02

On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 at 09:13 GMT, Robert Klemme <bob.news@gmx.net> wrote:

[#91605] Re: principle of most suprise — Frank Schmitt <invalid@...> 2004/02/05

tony summerfelt <snowzone5@hotmail.com> writes:

[#91631] Re: principle of most suprise — gedb@... (Ged) 2004/02/05

tony summerfelt <snowzone5@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<E4zSb.719$_62.294@read1.cgocable.net>...

[#91806] Re: principle of most suprise — tony summerfelt <snowzone5@...> 2004/02/08

On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 at 21:24 GMT, Maik Schmidt <contact@maik-schmidt.de> wrote:

[#91817] Re: principle of most suprise — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/02/08

[#91856] Re: principle of most suprise — tony summerfelt <snowzone5@...> 2004/02/08

On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 at 09:13 GMT, Robert Klemme <bob.news@gmx.net> wrote:

[#91935] Re: principle of most suprise — Frank Schmitt <invalid@...> 2004/02/08

tony summerfelt <snowzone5@hotmail.com> writes:

[#91943] Re: principle of most suprise — gedb@... (Ged) 2004/02/08

tony summerfelt <snowzone5@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<E4zSb.719$_62.294@read1.cgocable.net>...

[#92046] Re: principle of most suprise — tony summerfelt <snowzone5@...> 2004/02/08

On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 at 09:13 GMT, Robert Klemme <bob.news@gmx.net> wrote:

[#92125] Re: principle of most suprise — Frank Schmitt <invalid@...> 2004/02/09

tony summerfelt <snowzone5@hotmail.com> writes:

[#92134] Re: principle of most suprise — gedb@... (Ged) 2004/02/09

tony summerfelt <snowzone5@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<E4zSb.719$_62.294@read1.cgocable.net>...

[#92181] Re: principle of most suprise — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/02/09

[#92236] Re: principle of most suprise — tony summerfelt <snowzone5@...> 2004/02/09

On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 at 09:13 GMT, Robert Klemme <bob.news@gmx.net> wrote:

[#92330] Re: principle of most suprise — gedb@... (Ged) 2004/02/09

tony summerfelt <snowzone5@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<E4zSb.719$_62.294@read1.cgocable.net>...

[#92315] Re: principle of most suprise — Frank Schmitt <invalid@...> 2004/02/09

tony summerfelt <snowzone5@hotmail.com> writes:

[#91064] open-uri and proxies — intc_ctor@... (Phil Tomson)

I was trying to play with open-uri as shown on Whytheluckystiff's

3 messages 2004/01/30

[#91068] Re: open-uri and proxies — "Bermejo, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.bermejo@...> 2004/01/30

Phil:

[#91074] Re: open-uri and proxies — intc_ctor@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/01/30

intc_ctor@yahoo.com (Phil Tomson) wrote in message news:<c68ca8f2.0401300938.22c699b9@posting.google.com>...

[#91071] Accesing to private attributes — "Imobach =?iso-8859-15?q?Gonz=E1lez_Sosa?=" <imodev@...>

Hi all,

14 messages 2004/01/30

[#91836] Re: Accesing to private attributes — gedb@... (Ged) 2004/02/08

Dan Doel <djd15@po.cwru.edu> wrote in message news:<401AE1AC.6090201@po.cwru.edu>...

[#92365] Re: Accesing to private attributes — gedb@... (Ged) 2004/02/09

Dan Doel <djd15@po.cwru.edu> wrote in message news:<401AE1AC.6090201@po.cwru.edu>...

[#91072] Re: Accesing to private attributes — "David Naseby" <david.naseby@...> 2004/01/30

> -----Original Message-----

[#91073] Re: Accesing to private attributes — Dan Doel <djd15@...> 2004/01/30

You can do it.

[#91256] Re: Accesing to private attributes — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/02/02

[#91292] Re: Accesing to private attributes — gedb@... (Ged) 2004/02/02

Dan Doel <djd15@po.cwru.edu> wrote in message news:<401AE1AC.6090201@po.cwru.edu>...

[#91303] Re: Accesing to private attributes — Dan Doel <djd15@...> 2004/02/02

Ged wrote:

[#91819] Re: Accesing to private attributes — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/02/08

[#92009] Re: Accesing to private attributes — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/02/08

[#92026] Re: Accesing to private attributes — gedb@... (Ged) 2004/02/08

Dan Doel <djd15@po.cwru.edu> wrote in message news:<401AE1AC.6090201@po.cwru.edu>...

[#92185] Re: Accesing to private attributes — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/02/09

[#92215] Re: Accesing to private attributes — gedb@... (Ged) 2004/02/09

Dan Doel <djd15@po.cwru.edu> wrote in message news:<401AE1AC.6090201@po.cwru.edu>...

[#92336] Re: Accesing to private attributes — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/02/09

[#91079] question about install.rb — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>

1 message 2004/01/31

[#91088] flip flop operator and assignment — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson)

I'm working on the pattern matching section for

25 messages 2004/01/31

[#91501] Re: flip flop operator proposal (from condition to condition do ) — intc_ctor@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/02/03

Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@PATH.Berkeley.EDU> wrote in message news:<401FFA2D.40608@path.berkeley.edu>...

[#91902] Re: flip flop operator proposal (from condition to condition do ) — intc_ctor@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/02/08

Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@PATH.Berkeley.EDU> wrote in message news:<401FFA2D.40608@path.berkeley.edu>...

[#92092] Re: flip flop operator proposal (from condition to condition do ) — intc_ctor@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/02/08

Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@PATH.Berkeley.EDU> wrote in message news:<401FFA2D.40608@path.berkeley.edu>...

[#91889] Re: flip flop operator proposal (from condition to condition do ) — intc_ctor@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/02/08

Jamis Buck <jgb3@email.byu.edu> wrote in message news:<401F1E82.1080008@email.byu.edu>...

[#91908] Re: flip flop operator proposal (from condition to condition do ) — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/02/08

In article <40203AC3.4010207@email.byu.edu>,

[#92079] Re: flip flop operator proposal (from condition to condition do ) — intc_ctor@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/02/08

Jamis Buck <jgb3@email.byu.edu> wrote in message news:<401F1E82.1080008@email.byu.edu>...

[#92098] Re: flip flop operator proposal (from condition to condition do ) — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/02/09

In article <40203AC3.4010207@email.byu.edu>,

[#92288] Re: flip flop operator proposal (from condition to condition do ) — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/02/09

In article <40203AC3.4010207@email.byu.edu>,

[#91093] Re: flip flop operator and assignment — ts <decoux@...> 2004/01/31

>>>>> "P" == Phil Tomson <ptkwt@aracnet.com> writes:

[#91118] Re: flip flop operator and assignment — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/01/31

In article <200401311343.i0VDh2Z00793@moulon.inra.fr>,

[#91163] Re: flip flop operator and assignment — ts <decoux@...> 2004/02/01

>>>>> "P" == Phil Tomson <ptkwt@aracnet.com> writes:

[#91389] Re: flip flop operator and assignment — Jamis Buck <jgb3@...> 2004/02/03

ts wrote:

[#91394] Re: flip flop operator and assignment — nobu.nokada@... 2004/02/03

Hi,

[#91406] Re: flip flop operator and assignment — Jamis Buck <jgb3@...> 2004/02/03

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#91454] Re: flip flop operator proposal (from condition to condition do ) — intc_ctor@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/02/03

Jamis Buck <jgb3@email.byu.edu> wrote in message news:<401F1E82.1080008@email.byu.edu>...

[#91508] Re: flip flop operator proposal (from condition to condition do ) — Jamis Buck <jgb3@...> 2004/02/04

Phil Tomson wrote:

[#91513] Re: flip flop operator proposal (from condition to condition do ) — nobu.nokada@... 2004/02/04

Hi,

[#91521] Re: flip flop operator proposal (from condition to condition do ) — Jamis Buck <jgb3@...> 2004/02/04

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#91522] Re: flip flop operator proposal (from condition to condition do ) — nobu.nokada@... 2004/02/04

Hi,

[#91574] Re: flip flop operator proposal (from condition to condition do ) — Jamis Buck <jgb3@...> 2004/02/04

nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#91465] Re: flip flop operator proposal (from condition to condition do ) — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/02/03

Phil Tomson wrote:

[#91520] Re: flip flop operator proposal (from condition to condition do ) — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/02/04

In article <40203AC3.4010207@email.byu.edu>,

[#92269] Re: flip flop operator proposal (from condition to condition do ) — intc_ctor@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/02/09

Jamis Buck <jgb3@email.byu.edu> wrote in message news:<401F1E82.1080008@email.byu.edu>...

[#92282] Re: flip flop operator proposal (from condition to condition do ) — intc_ctor@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/02/09

Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@PATH.Berkeley.EDU> wrote in message news:<401FFA2D.40608@path.berkeley.edu>...

[#91089] No difference between .. and ... flip/flop operators? — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson)

50 messages 2004/01/31

[#91145] Re: Save the flip/flop op! — avi@...4.com (Avi Bryant) 2004/02/01

ptkwt@aracnet.com (Phil Tomson) wrote:

[#91181] Re: Save the flip/flop op! — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/02/01

[#91767] Re: Save the flip/flop op! — Ian Hobson <NewGroups@...> 2004/02/08

In message <401C910E.80308@yahoo.com>, Michael campbell

[#91869] Re: Save the flip/flop op! — sabbyxtabby@... (Sabby and Tabby) 2004/02/08

This one short-circuits, evaluating the left operand when the

[#91988] Re: Save the flip/flop op! — Ian Hobson <NewGroups@...> 2004/02/08

In message <401C910E.80308@yahoo.com>, Michael campbell

[#92059] Re: Save the flip/flop op! — sabbyxtabby@... (Sabby and Tabby) 2004/02/08

This one short-circuits, evaluating the left operand when the

[#92416] Re: Save the flip/flop op! — Ian Hobson <NewGroups@...> 2004/02/09

In message <401C910E.80308@yahoo.com>, Michael campbell

[#91123] Re: Save the flip/flop op! — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/01/31

In article <401C0A45.3000504@hypermetrics.com>,

[#91090] Re: No difference between .. and ... flip/flop operators? — Dan Doel <djd15@...> 2004/01/31

When constructing ranges of values (such as Fixnums), ... excludes the

[#91096] Re: No difference between .. and ... flip/flop operators? — Michael campbell <michael_s_campbell@...> 2004/01/31

Dan Doel wrote:

[#91097] Re: No difference between .. and ... flip/flop operators? — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...> 2004/01/31

On Jan 31, 2004, at 09:38, Michael campbell wrote:

[#91098] Re: No difference between .. and ... flip/flop operators? — Michael campbell <michael_s_campbell@...> 2004/01/31

Nathaniel Talbott wrote:

[#91103] Re: No difference between .. and ... flip/flop operators? — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...> 2004/01/31

On Jan 31, 2004, at 10:58, Michael campbell wrote:

[#91105] Re: No difference between .. and ... flip/flop operators? — Michael campbell <michael_s_campbell@...> 2004/01/31

Nathaniel Talbott wrote:

[#91107] Re: No difference between .. and ... flip/flop operators? — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...> 2004/01/31

On Jan 31, 2004, at 12:37, Michael campbell wrote:

[#91111] Re: No difference between .. and ... flip/flop operators? — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/01/31

In article <45F0D15E-5404-11D8-83F8-000A95CD7A8E@talbott.ws>,

[#91112] Re: No difference between .. and ... flip/flop operators? — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/01/31

In article <401B6792.10204@po.cwru.edu>, Dan Doel <djd15@po.cwru.edu> wrote:

[#91125] Re: No difference between .. and ... flip/flop operators? — Dan Doel <djd15@...> 2004/01/31

Phil Tomson wrote:

[#91127] Re: No difference between .. and ... flip/flop operators? — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/01/31

Dan Doel wrote:

[#91129] Re: No difference between .. and ... flip/flop operators? — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...> 2004/01/31

On Jan 31, 2004, at 16:51, Dan Doel wrote:

[#91133] Re: No difference between .. and ... flip/flop operators? — Dan Doel <djd15@...> 2004/01/31

Ah, I see.

[#91132] Re: No difference between .. and ... flip/flop operators? — Michael campbell <michael_s_campbell@...> 2004/01/31

> http://sean.chittenden.org/programming/ruby/programming_ruby/

[#91114] Save the flip/flop op! — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/01/31

In article <E15487A8-540F-11D8-83F8-000A95CD7A8E@talbott.ws>,

[#91115] Re: Save the flip/flop op! — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/01/31

Phil Tomson wrote:

[#91122] Re: Save the flip/flop op! — Michael campbell <michael_s_campbell@...> 2004/01/31

Hal Fulton wrote:

[#91124] Re: Save the flip/flop op! — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/01/31

Michael campbell wrote:

[#91130] Re: Save the flip/flop op! — Michael campbell <michael_s_campbell@...> 2004/01/31

Hal Fulton wrote:

[#91135] Re: Save the flip/flop op! — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...> 2004/01/31

On Jan 31, 2004, at 17:10, Michael campbell wrote:

[#91136] Re: Save the flip/flop op! — Michael campbell <michael_s_campbell@...> 2004/01/31

Nathaniel Talbott wrote:

[#91147] Re: Save the flip/flop op! — "John W. Kennedy" <jwkenne@...> 2004/02/01

Hal Fulton wrote:

[#91149] Re: Save the flip/flop op! — Michael campbell <michael_s_campbell@...> 2004/02/01

John W. Kennedy wrote:

[#91116] Re: No difference between .. and ... flip/flop operators? — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/01/31

In article <7434BCFA-541B-11D8-83F8-000A95CD7A8E@talbott.ws>,

[#91141] Re: Save the flip/flop op! — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/02/01

In article <6e869a6b.0401311614.1334a5fc@posting.google.com>,

[#91142] Re: Save the flip/flop op! — Michael campbell <michael_s_campbell@...> 2004/02/01

Phil Tomson wrote:

[#91139] Re: Save the flip/flop op! — avi@...4.com (Avi Bryant) 2004/02/01

ptkwt@aracnet.com (Phil Tomson) wrote in message news:<bvgv9u2mb1@enews1.newsguy.com>...

[#91140] Re: Save the flip/flop op! — avi@...4.com (Avi Bryant) 2004/02/01

I wrote:

[#91137] Re: No difference between .. and ... flip/flop operators? — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/01/31

In article <2F46EE5C-543A-11D8-99FF-000A95CD7A8E@talbott.ws>,

[#91143] Re: Save the flip/flop op! — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson) 2004/02/01

In article <401C50D5.601@yahoo.com>,

[#91144] Question on the flip/flop op — "Zach Dennis" <zdennis@...> 2004/02/01

With the following code where 'f' is an file handle:

[#91165] Re: Question on the flip/flop op — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/02/01

[#91196] Re: Question on the flip/flop op — "Zach Dennis" <zdennis@...> 2004/02/01

Sorry for the misposted code, I meant:

[#91188] Re: Question on the flip/flop op — Michael campbell <michael_s_campbell@...> 2004/02/01

Robert Klemme wrote:

[#91195] Re: Question on the flip/flop op — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/02/01

[#91171] Re: Save the flip/flop op! — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/02/01

[#91176] Re: Save the flip/flop op! — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/01

On Sunday, February 1, 2004, 11:29:50 PM, Robert wrote:

[#91384] Re: Save the flip/flop op! — sabbyxtabby@... (Sabby and Tabby) 2004/02/03

This one short-circuits, evaluating the left operand when the

[#92189] Re: Save the flip/flop op! — Ian Hobson <NewGroups@...> 2004/02/09

In message <401C910E.80308@yahoo.com>, Michael campbell

[#92249] Re: Save the flip/flop op! — sabbyxtabby@... (Sabby and Tabby) 2004/02/09

This one short-circuits, evaluating the left operand when the

[#92439] Re: Save the flip/flop op! — sabbyxtabby@... (Sabby and Tabby) 2004/02/09

This one short-circuits, evaluating the left operand when the

[#91094] ruby-fcgi on FreeBSD 5.1 — Carsten Eckelmann <careck@...42.com>

Hi,

2 messages 2004/01/31

[#91108] Re: ruby-fcgi on FreeBSD 5.1 — Shu-yu Guo <shu@...> 2004/01/31

On Saturday January 31 2004 14:03, Carsten Eckelmann wrote:

[#91099] Ruby 1.8.1 REXML performance — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...>

I have a script that uses REXML to stream parse an XML file and load a

27 messages 2004/01/31

[#91106] Re: Ruby 1.8.1 REXML performance — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...> 2004/01/31

Here's a little more data. I've stripped the application down to a

[#91224] (OT) Open Source != Do it yourself (was: Re: Ruby 1.8.1 REXML performance) — "Rich" <rich@...> 2004/02/01

Open source == Learn it yourself by trying and get it right if you can,

[#91227] Re: (OT) Open Source != Do it yourself (was: Re: Ruby 1.8.1 REXML performance) — "Zach Dennis" <zdennis@...> 2004/02/01

[#91231] Re: (OT) Open Source != Do it yourself (was: Re: Ruby 1.8.1 REXML performance) — "Rich" <rich@...> 2004/02/01

Lol...

[#91230] Re: (OT) Open Source != Do it yourself (was: Re: Ruby 1.8.1 REXML performance) — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/02/01

Zach Dennis wrote:

[#92852] Re: Ruby 1.8.1 REXML performance — ser@... (Sean Russell) 2004/02/14

Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@ieee.org> wrote in message news:<402B8EFE.6000202@ieee.org>...

[#91128] Re: Ruby 1.8.1 REXML performance — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...> 2004/01/31

Quick update--I'll post numbers later. It appears that the REXML stream

[#91146] Re: Ruby 1.8.1 REXML performance — djberg96@... (Daniel Berger) 2004/02/01

Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@ieee.org> wrote in message news:<401C268F.80805@ieee.org>...

[#91150] Re: Ruby 1.8.1 REXML performance — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...> 2004/02/01

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#91193] Re: Ruby 1.8.1 REXML performance — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...> 2004/02/01

I've repeated all the tests with Ruby 1.8.0 and it sure looks like

[#91202] Re: Ruby 1.8.1 REXML performance — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...> 2004/02/01

Hello Steven,

[#91204] Re: Ruby 1.8.1 REXML performance — Martin Weber <Ephaeton@...> 2004/02/01

On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 04:01:09AM +0900, Lothar Scholz wrote:

[#91207] Re: Ruby 1.8.1 REXML performance — paul vudmaska <paul@...> 2004/02/01

Lothar Scholz wrote:

[#91208] Re: Ruby 1.8.1 REXML performance — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...> 2004/02/01

Lothar Scholz wrote:

[#91216] Re: Ruby 1.8.1 REXML performance — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/02/01

On Monday, February 2, 2004, 6:29:30 AM, Steven wrote:

[#91212] Re: Ruby 1.8.1 REXML performance — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...> 2004/02/01

For the record, here's a workaround:

[#91228] Re: (OT) the Ruby community (was (OT) Open Source != Do it yourself — Tim Hunter <cyclists@...> 2004/02/01

On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 07:12:26 +0900, Rich wrote:

[#91416] Re: Ruby 1.8.1 REXML performance — Michael Vondung <mvondung@...> 2004/02/03

On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 04:01:09 +0900, Lothar Scholz

[#91426] Re: Ruby 1.8.1 REXML performance — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2004/02/03

Quoteing mvondung@gmx.net, on Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 12:35:02AM +0900:

[#91427] Re: Ruby 1.8.1 REXML performance — Dick Davies <rasputnik@...> 2004/02/03

* Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com> [0228 16:28]:

[#91879] Re: Ruby 1.8.1 REXML performance — Michael Vondung <mvondung@...> 2004/02/08

On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 04:01:09 +0900, Lothar Scholz

[#91808] Re: (OT) the Ruby community (was (OT) Open Source != Do it yourself — Tim Hunter <cyclists@...> 2004/02/08

On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 07:12:26 +0900, Rich wrote:

[#92069] Re: Ruby 1.8.1 REXML performance — Michael Vondung <mvondung@...> 2004/02/08

On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 04:01:09 +0900, Lothar Scholz

[#92259] Re: Ruby 1.8.1 REXML performance — Michael Vondung <mvondung@...> 2004/02/09

On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 04:01:09 +0900, Lothar Scholz

[#92502] Re: Ruby 1.8.1 REXML performance — ser@... (Sean Russell) 2004/02/09

Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@ieee.org> wrote in message news:<401D5E09.9030401@ieee.org>...

[#92698] Re: Ruby 1.8.1 REXML performance — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...> 2004/02/12

Sean Russell wrote:

[#91101] credit card processing — Armin Roehrl <armin@...>

Hi,

5 messages 2004/01/31

[#91102] Re: credit card processing — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/01/31

[#91138] Re: credit card processing — Ruby Baby <ruby@...> 2004/01/31

someone asked:

[#135536] Re: credit card processing — "Lucas Carlson" <cardmagic@...> 2005/03/28

I have actually been working on this for a while:

[#91113] Re: credit card processing — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...> 2004/01/31

Hello Armin,

[#91104] graphics lib? — Alwin Blok <alwinblok@...>

Hello,

38 messages 2004/01/31

[#91259] Re: graphics lib? — dmertz@... (denis) 2004/02/02

Alwin Blok <alwinblok@fakevirus.net> wrote in message news:<279FDE5D-5410-11D8-9F89-003065C833A2@fakevirus.net>...

[#91823] Re: graphics lib? — Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...> 2004/02/08

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 16:18:50 -0600, Charles Comstock wrote:

[#92012] Re: graphics lib? — dmertz@... (denis) 2004/02/08

Alwin Blok <alwinblok@fakevirus.net> wrote in message news:<279FDE5D-5410-11D8-9F89-003065C833A2@fakevirus.net>...

[#92013] Re: graphics lib? — Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...> 2004/02/08

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 16:18:50 -0600, Charles Comstock wrote:

[#91179] Re: graphics lib? — Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...> 2004/02/01

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 02:12:43 +0900, Alwin Blok wrote:

[#91807] Re: graphics lib? — Charles Comstock <cc1@...> 2004/02/08

Simon Strandgaard wrote:

[#91226] Re: graphics lib? — Charles Comstock <cc1@...> 2004/02/01

Simon Strandgaard wrote:

[#91403] Re: graphics lib? — Dick Davies <rasputnik@...> 2004/02/03

* Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@adslhome.dk> [0255 13:55]:

[#91262] Re: graphics lib? — Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...> 2004/02/02

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 16:18:50 -0600, Charles Comstock wrote:

[#91362] Re: graphics lib? — Charles Comstock <cc1@...> 2004/02/03

Simon Strandgaard wrote:

[#91363] Re: graphics lib? — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2004/02/03

Charles Comstock wrote:

[#92058] Re: graphics lib? — "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@...> 2004/02/08

On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Charles Comstock wrote:

[#92248] Re: graphics lib? — "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@...> 2004/02/09

On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Charles Comstock wrote:

[#91382] Re: graphics lib? — "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@...> 2004/02/03

On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Charles Comstock wrote:

[#91391] Re: graphics lib? — Charles Comstock <cc1@...> 2004/02/03

Ara.T.Howard wrote:

[#91418] Re: graphics lib? — "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@...> 2004/02/03

On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Charles Comstock wrote:

[#91880] Re: graphics lib? — "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@...> 2004/02/08

On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Charles Comstock wrote:

[#92070] Re: graphics lib? — "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@...> 2004/02/08

On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Charles Comstock wrote:

[#92260] Re: graphics lib? — "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@...> 2004/02/09

On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Charles Comstock wrote:

[#92250] Re: graphics lib? — Charles Comstock <cc1@...> 2004/02/09

Ara.T.Howard wrote:

[#91870] Re: graphics lib? — Charles Comstock <cc1@...> 2004/02/08

Ara.T.Howard wrote:

[#92060] Re: graphics lib? — Charles Comstock <cc1@...> 2004/02/08

Ara.T.Howard wrote:

[#91868] Re: graphics lib? — "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@...> 2004/02/08

On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Charles Comstock wrote:

[#92438] Re: graphics lib? — "Ara.T.Howard" <ahoward@...> 2004/02/09

On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Charles Comstock wrote:

[#91860] Re: graphics lib? — Charles Comstock <cc1@...> 2004/02/08

Simon Strandgaard wrote:

[#92240] Re: graphics lib? — Charles Comstock <cc1@...> 2004/02/09

Simon Strandgaard wrote:

[#92050] Re: graphics lib? — Charles Comstock <cc1@...> 2004/02/08

Simon Strandgaard wrote:

[#92421] Re: graphics lib? — Charles Comstock <cc1@...> 2004/02/09

Simon Strandgaard wrote:

[#91400] Re: graphics lib? — Tim Hunter <cyclists@...> 2004/02/03

On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 09:33:01 +0900, Hal Fulton wrote:

[#91821] Re: graphics lib? — dmertz@... (denis) 2004/02/08

Alwin Blok <alwinblok@fakevirus.net> wrote in message news:<279FDE5D-5410-11D8-9F89-003065C833A2@fakevirus.net>...

[#91874] Re: graphics lib? — Tim Hunter <cyclists@...> 2004/02/08

On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 09:33:01 +0900, Hal Fulton wrote:

[#92064] Re: graphics lib? — Tim Hunter <cyclists@...> 2004/02/08

On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 09:33:01 +0900, Hal Fulton wrote:

[#92188] Re: graphics lib? — dmertz@... (denis) 2004/02/09

Alwin Blok <alwinblok@fakevirus.net> wrote in message news:<279FDE5D-5410-11D8-9F89-003065C833A2@fakevirus.net>...

[#92192] Re: graphics lib? — Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...> 2004/02/09

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 16:18:50 -0600, Charles Comstock wrote:

[#92254] Re: graphics lib? — Tim Hunter <cyclists@...> 2004/02/09

On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 09:33:01 +0900, Hal Fulton wrote:

[#92338] Re: graphics lib? — dmertz@... (denis) 2004/02/09

Alwin Blok <alwinblok@fakevirus.net> wrote in message news:<279FDE5D-5410-11D8-9F89-003065C833A2@fakevirus.net>...

[#92342] Re: graphics lib? — Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...> 2004/02/09

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 16:18:50 -0600, Charles Comstock wrote:

[#91109] cascading message sends — paulmg@... (Paul MG)

In Smalltalk, which Ruby is much like in some ways, you can 'cascade'

7 messages 2004/01/31

[#91110] Re: cascading message sends — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/01/31

Paul MG wrote:

[#91119] Re: cascading message sends — Dan Doel <djd15@...> 2004/01/31

Joel VanderWerf wrote:

[#91121] Re: cascading message sends — "Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@...> 2004/01/31

On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 11:16:50AM -0800, Paul MG wrote:

[#91131] Re: cascading message sends — Guillaume Marcais <guslist@...> 2004/01/31

What about this:

[#91134] Re: cascading message sends — Gennady <bystr@...> 2004/01/31

[#91198] Re: cascading message sends — paulmg@... (Paul MG) 2004/02/01

"Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@mail.com> wrote in message news:<20040131211520.GA15084@mulan.thereeds.org>...

Re: Nested scopes and the Singleton pattern

From: "Christoph" <swap@... (news_chr)>

Date: 2004-01-15 22:46:39 UTC

List: ruby-talk #89967

nobu wrote
...
> > > Just using Thread.critical.  And seems close to your idea
> > > excepting for it uses "instance" method rather than "new".
>
> Not accurate, it uses 3-state; before, during and after
> creation, but I feel it should use mutex or something.

You probably always need a 3-state if you want a self
modifying first instance call (at least in some implicit way).

Here is a mutexy version of singleton.rb I wrote some time
ago - it is probably more robust then the current code but equally
obscure - sorry ...

/Christoph


begin 666 singleton.diff
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A4VEN9VQE=&]N.DUO9'5L90T**V5N9 T**PT**V5N9 T*
`
end

Thread

Prev Next

In This Thread

Prev Next