From: Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...>
Date: 2004-01-12T06:21:37+09:00
Subject: Re: regex to NOT match?

On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 06:10:23 +0900, David Garamond wrote:

> Zach Dennis wrote:
>> The only
>> huge difference seems to be how the regex is implemented and that some
>> languages don't implement some metacharacters, character sets and options,
>> but the most basic of these are the same in Perl, Java, Ruby, etc..
> 
> Btw, I hear Oniguruma will be pretty kick-ass, no? :) From what I've 
> read it already supports many things that the current regexp engine 
> lacks, like look-behind, atomic group & possessive quantifiers, and 
> named captures.

Right.     


I am working on another regexp-engine, which both will support
perl5 + perl6 syntax. Mark Sparshatt are working on perl6.
http://raa.ruby-lang.org/list.rhtml?name=regexp
I don't know it this has anyones interest?

--
Simon Strandgaard