From: David Garamond <lists@...6.isreserved.com>
Date: 2004-01-12T06:10:23+09:00
Subject: Re: regex to NOT match?

Zach Dennis wrote:
> The only
> huge difference seems to be how the regex is implemented and that some
> languages don't implement some metacharacters, character sets and options,
> but the most basic of these are the same in Perl, Java, Ruby, etc..

Btw, I hear Oniguruma will be pretty kick-ass, no? :) From what I've 
read it already supports many things that the current regexp engine 
lacks, like look-behind, atomic group & possessive quantifiers, and 
named captures.

-- 
dave