[#600] A `File' is not a `IO'????? — clemens.hintze@...

17 messages 1999/08/10
[#602] Re: A `File' is not a `IO'????? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/08/10

Hi,

[#679] Documentation about RD? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>

Hi,

78 messages 1999/08/17
[#680] Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Documentation about RD?) — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/08/18

=begin

[#683] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Documenta tion about RD?) — clemens.hintze@... 1999/08/18

On 18 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:

[#686] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Documenta tion about RD?) — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/08/18

Hi,

[#687] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Docum enta tion about RD?) — clemens.hintze@... 1999/08/18

On 18 Aug, GOTO Kentaro wrote:

[#693] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Docum enta tion about RD?) — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/08/18

Hi,

[#695] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Docum enta tion about RD?) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/08/18

On 19 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:

[#697] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Docum enta tion about RD?) — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/08/19

Hi,

[#703] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Docum enta tion about RD?) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/08/19

On 19 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:

[#706] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Docum enta tion about RD?) — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/08/19

Hi,

[#681] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Documentation about RD?) — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/08/18

Hi,

[#682] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Documentation about RD?) — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/08/18

Hi,

[#684] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Documentation about RD?) — TAKAHASHI Masayoshi <maki@...> 1999/08/18

Hi Tosh and all,

[#685] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Documentation about RD?) — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/08/18

Hi,

[#689] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Documentation about RD?) — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/08/18

Hi,

[#694] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Documentation about RD?) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/08/18

Hi,

[#700] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Documentation about RD?) — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/08/19

Hi,

[#702] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Documentation about RD?) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/08/19

Hi,

[#704] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Docum entation about RD?) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/08/19

On 19 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#719] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Docum entation about RD?) — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/08/20

Hi,

[#720] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Docum entation about RD?) — clemens.hintze@... 1999/08/20

On 20 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:

[#721] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Docum entation about RD?) — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/08/20

Hi,

[#722] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Docum entation about RD?) — clemens.hintze@... 1999/08/20

On 21 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:

[#723] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Docum entation about RD?) — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/08/20

Hi,

[#737] RD with multi charset — Minero Aoki <aamine@...>

Hi, I'm Minero Aoki. This is my first mail in this mailling list.

26 messages 1999/08/22

[ruby-talk:00731] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Docum entation about RD?)

From: Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Date: 1999-08-21 08:32:15 UTC
List: ruby-talk #731
Hi,

On 21 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> [...]

[...]
 
> Oh! that's my fault! Excuse me, I often sum up my opinion excessively, maybe
> because I can't write well in English...

So here we are two! :-))

[...]

> 
> Well, please forget my example of HTML and about case of ItemList and
> EnumList too. This is about DescList again.
> 
> In [ruby-talk:00704], you proposed to define baseline of DescList according
> to indent of Term-part like this:
> 
> :    Term
>      |<-- baseline
>      First TextElement
>        Verbatim, because deeper
>      First TextElement too.
> 
> Is my understanding right?

Yep!

> 
> And my opinion is:
> I want to write DescList whose Term-part and Definition-part have different
> baselines like this:
> 
> :Ruby
>    Object-Oriented Scripting Language. More neat and simple than Perl, and
>    more easy and simple than Python.
> :Perl
>    Widely used Scripting Language. But sometimes people make script 
>    complicated when they write it in Perl.

You mean you want to structure for the RD doc too, yes? If so, than matz
proposal seems to be the best solution. With the restriction, of course,
that we cannot denote the `First TextElement' to be a verbose one.
Perhaps with using InlineElements? :-///

> 
> So, I suppose your proposal to define baseline of Definition-part 
> by Term-part might be restriction.
> (There is the reason  I write such DescList in [ruby-talk:00726])

I have not paid enought attention, how you have wrote the list in your
message; sorry :-}

> 
>> 
>> PS: I really should find time to learn Japanese, shouldn't I? ;-))))
> 
> Oh, it is me who have to learn English...
> 
> But, to learn Japanese is not bad idea because there are a lot of Ruby hacker
> in ruby-list, Japanese Ruby ML.

That would be the main-reason! :-))) BTW: How many Ruby-Hackers resp.
Ruby-User are there in Japan? And is Ruby used elsewhere in Asia too (I
mean more than in America or Europe)?

> 
> ---
> Tosh

\cle

In This Thread