[#600] A `File' is not a `IO'????? — clemens.hintze@...

17 messages 1999/08/10
[#602] Re: A `File' is not a `IO'????? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/08/10

Hi,

[#679] Documentation about RD? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>

Hi,

78 messages 1999/08/17
[#680] Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Documentation about RD?) — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/08/18

=begin

[#683] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Documenta tion about RD?) — clemens.hintze@... 1999/08/18

On 18 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:

[#686] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Documenta tion about RD?) — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/08/18

Hi,

[#687] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Docum enta tion about RD?) — clemens.hintze@... 1999/08/18

On 18 Aug, GOTO Kentaro wrote:

[#693] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Docum enta tion about RD?) — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/08/18

Hi,

[#695] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Docum enta tion about RD?) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/08/18

On 19 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:

[#697] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Docum enta tion about RD?) — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/08/19

Hi,

[#703] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Docum enta tion about RD?) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/08/19

On 19 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:

[#706] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Docum enta tion about RD?) — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/08/19

Hi,

[#681] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Documentation about RD?) — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/08/18

Hi,

[#682] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Documentation about RD?) — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/08/18

Hi,

[#684] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Documentation about RD?) — TAKAHASHI Masayoshi <maki@...> 1999/08/18

Hi Tosh and all,

[#685] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Documentation about RD?) — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 1999/08/18

Hi,

[#689] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Documentation about RD?) — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/08/18

Hi,

[#694] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Documentation about RD?) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/08/18

Hi,

[#700] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Documentation about RD?) — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/08/19

Hi,

[#702] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Documentation about RD?) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 1999/08/19

Hi,

[#704] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Docum entation about RD?) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 1999/08/19

On 19 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#719] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Docum entation about RD?) — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/08/20

Hi,

[#720] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Docum entation about RD?) — clemens.hintze@... 1999/08/20

On 20 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:

[#721] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Docum entation about RD?) — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/08/20

Hi,

[#722] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Docum entation about RD?) — clemens.hintze@... 1999/08/20

On 21 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:

[#723] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Docum entation about RD?) — Toshiro Kuwabara <toshirok@...3.so-net.ne.jp> 1999/08/20

Hi,

[#737] RD with multi charset — Minero Aoki <aamine@...>

Hi, I'm Minero Aoki. This is my first mail in this mailling list.

26 messages 1999/08/22

[ruby-talk:00634] ANN: testsupp.rb 0.1

From: Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Date: 1999-08-11 18:08:58 UTC
List: ruby-talk #634
Hi,

I want to announce my testsupp.rb library to the public. The lib is
not tested enough to be bullet-proof, but seems simple enough to be
relative error free (means, it works for me ;-).

But however, if you find any error, or if you have any improvement
proposal, please let me know:

	mailto: c.hintze@gmx.net

I have put the files `testsupp.rb' and `testsupp.README' into the
`incoming' incoming directory of the FTP server right now. But it will
take its time until matz has moved them into the `contrib' directory.
Then you will find them there.

Following I have included the README, which is only the commented part
of the source.

Happy testing,
\cle

########
# testsupp.rb by C.Hintze 11.08.1999               (mailto: c.hintze@gmx.net)
#
# $Id: testsupp.rb,v 1.6 1999/08/11 17:54:16 cle Exp $
# $Release Version: 0.1$
#
# The methods of that module are derived directly from the ones contained
# in the file `sample/test.rb' contained in the Ruby delivery. I don't know
# who has originally written them, but I assume it was Yukihiro Matsumoto
# <matz@netlab.co.jp>. I have done not much more, than to put them together
# into this module, and modify theirs output. But, however, if you find an
# error within, it is certain that it was me, who has introduced it ;-)
#
# The methods are thought to help you to write very simple scripts supporting
# you to test a class, module or extension.
#
# Example of usage without categories:
#
#   require "testsupp"; include TestSupp
#
#   start_tests
#
#   s1 = "hello world"      # Create a string
#   s2 = String.new s1      # Create another one, with same contents as s1
#   ok s1 == s2             # Both should be equal
#   s1[1] = ?a              # Change "hello" -> "hallo" in s1
#   ok s1 != s2             # Now they should be different :-)
#
#   end_tests
#
# Example with categories:
#
#   require "testsupp"; include TestSupp
#
#   start_tests
#
#   check "String concatenation"
#   s1 = "hello"
#   s2 = "world"
#   ok((s1+" "+s2) == "hello world")
#   ok((s1<<" "<<s2) == "hello world")
#   ok s1 == "hello world"
#
#   check "String slicing"
#   ok s1[1..2] == "el"
#   ok s1[-8..-7] == "lo"
#
#   check "String replacement"
#   s1 = "hello"
#   s2 = "world"
#   s3 = s1
#   s1[1] = ?a
#   s2[1..-1] = "elt"
#   ok s1 == s3
#   ok (s1+" "+s2) == "hallo welt"
#
#   end_tests
#
########
#                               LICENSE:
#                         SAME LICENSE AS RUBY.
#############################################################################
#        I really hate it to say, but nevertheless here comes...            #
#                                                                           #
#                             THE WARRANTY:                                 #
# I DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE, INCLUDING ALL     #
# IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS, IN NO EVENT SHALL I BE #
# LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES  #
# WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN     #
# ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF   #
# OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.            #
#############################################################################

In This Thread

Prev Next