[#539] A new discussion topic ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi all,
[#546] Question concerning modules (1) — clemens.hintze@...
[#548] Bug: concerning Modules! — clemens.hintze@...
[#564] Ruby 1.3.7 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Ruby 1.3.7 is out, check out:
[#567] New feature request! :-) — clemens.hintze@...
On 6 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On 6 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#590] Bug in Array#clone! — clemens.hintze@...
Hi,
Hi,
[#600] A `File' is not a `IO'????? — clemens.hintze@...
Hi,
On 10 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On 11 Aug, GOTO Kentaro wrote:
Hi,
On 11 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
[#607] How to pass by `new' method of superclass? — clemens.hintze@...
[#626] Next misbehavior (sorry :-) — clemens.hintze@...
Hi,
[#634] ANN: testsupp.rb 0.1 — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
[#637] Backtrace of SIGSEGV — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
Hi,
On 12 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On 12 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
[#655] Your wish is fulfilled (erhm, almost ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi Gotoken,
[#667] How do I use `callcc' — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
[#668] Way to intercept method calls? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
[#679] Documentation about RD? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
=begin
On 18 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
On 18 Aug, GOTO Kentaro wrote:
Hi,
On 19 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
On 19 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On 19 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi
Hi,
Hi,
Hi Tosh and all,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On 19 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On 20 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
On 21 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
On 21 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On 24 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
I thought people might be interested in this. Here's how I am plugging
On 31 Aug, Jonathan Aseltine wrote:
[#737] RD with multi charset — Minero Aoki <aamine@...>
Hi, I'm Minero Aoki. This is my first mail in this mailling list.
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On 28 Aug, Minero Aoki wrote:
Hi,
[ruby-talk:00700] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Documentation about RD?)
Hi,
[...]
> My old rd2html.rb detect (well, tryed to detect, at least) them by
> indentation levels. That is:
>
> |: term
> | Text of first TextElement in definition part.
> | This is verbatim, because it's indented.
> | Text of FIRST TextElement, because it on the same indentation
> | level. Yes, we need indent level stack to implement this.
> |
> | Text of FIRST TextElement, too
How do we write Verbatim next to List. Like this?
: Term
First TextElement
Verbatim in List
First TextElement too.
Verbatim outside List?
> Empty lines are ignored for indentation (as in Python :-).
>
> |Another one: ( use "_" as white-space.)
> |
> |: Term
> |__Text of First TextElement.
> |__
> |__Text of Second TextElement.
> |
> |This is like Verbatim. but this may cause trouble under such condition.
> |
> |: Term
> |__Text of First TextElement
> | : Term of sub list
> |____Text of First TextElement of Sub list
> |__
> |____Which list have this TextElement?
> |
> |I think that is not good either.
>
> According to my scheme, this should be:
>
> |: Term
> |__Text of First TextElement
> | : Term of sub list
> |____Text of First TextElement of Sub list
> |____Following line is ignored as a blank line.
> |__
> |____This is continuing First TextElement of Sub list,
> |____because of its indent level.
> |
> |__Text of First TextElement.
> |__Terminates sub list automagically.
>
> What do you think?
This idea regards line of white-spaces as only indicating List
continuing...
I think it is good idea. But how can we write Verbatim in List?
---
Tosh