[#539] A new discussion topic ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi all,
[#546] Question concerning modules (1) — clemens.hintze@...
[#548] Bug: concerning Modules! — clemens.hintze@...
[#564] Ruby 1.3.7 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Ruby 1.3.7 is out, check out:
[#567] New feature request! :-) — clemens.hintze@...
On 6 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On 6 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#590] Bug in Array#clone! — clemens.hintze@...
Hi,
Hi,
[#600] A `File' is not a `IO'????? — clemens.hintze@...
Hi,
On 10 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On 11 Aug, GOTO Kentaro wrote:
Hi,
On 11 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
[#607] How to pass by `new' method of superclass? — clemens.hintze@...
[#626] Next misbehavior (sorry :-) — clemens.hintze@...
Hi,
[#634] ANN: testsupp.rb 0.1 — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
[#637] Backtrace of SIGSEGV — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
Hi,
On 12 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On 12 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
[#655] Your wish is fulfilled (erhm, almost ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi Gotoken,
[#667] How do I use `callcc' — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
[#668] Way to intercept method calls? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
[#679] Documentation about RD? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
=begin
On 18 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
On 18 Aug, GOTO Kentaro wrote:
Hi,
On 19 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
On 19 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On 19 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi
Hi,
Hi,
Hi Tosh and all,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On 19 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On 20 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
On 21 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
On 21 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On 24 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
I thought people might be interested in this. Here's how I am plugging
On 31 Aug, Jonathan Aseltine wrote:
[#737] RD with multi charset — Minero Aoki <aamine@...>
Hi, I'm Minero Aoki. This is my first mail in this mailling list.
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On 28 Aug, Minero Aoki wrote:
Hi,
[ruby-talk:00638] Re: ANN: testsupp.rb 0.1
On 12 Aug, GOTO Kentaro wrote: > Hi, > > In message "[ruby-talk:00634] ANN: testsupp.rb 0.1" > on 99/08/11, Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@gmx.net> writes: > [...] > It is simple but very nice!! :-) :-) Thank you :-))) > May I requiest some features? Of course :-) > > 1. test_section such as > def test_section(what = "(No Title)") > check(what) > start_tests > yield > end_tests > end Hmmm :-/ What do you want to do? Do you want to use it for a whole file? Because normally one test script should test more than one section, like the second example in the comment header of `testsupp.rb'. If you would use your test_section, it would restart the section numbering with (1) every time you use it. Is it that, what you expect? > > 2. quiet option for all method What dou you mean with it? What would a `quiet' option do? Suppress the whole output? > 3. customizable output format How would you prefer it? The output is somewhat complex because I have tried to pay attention to the grammar numerus of the sentences. Because of the complexity, I think template handling would be too confusing. I could think about calling another user-defined method with the corresponding parameters. Let it decide how to format the text and how to handle the grammar. Would that be okay for you? > 4. Would you meke methods module_function? Of course! I have forgot it! :-( > > -- gotoken \cle PS: I have currently another test library under developement. It is much more sophisticated and would pay attention regarding prerequisite testcases. You easily can write a parser that is able to parse the test description. Three parsers (until yet) are already contained in that package. But I have to document it a little bit more... :)