[#539] A new discussion topic ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi all,
[#546] Question concerning modules (1) — clemens.hintze@...
[#548] Bug: concerning Modules! — clemens.hintze@...
[#564] Ruby 1.3.7 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Ruby 1.3.7 is out, check out:
[#567] New feature request! :-) — clemens.hintze@...
On 6 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On 6 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#590] Bug in Array#clone! — clemens.hintze@...
Hi,
Hi,
[#600] A `File' is not a `IO'????? — clemens.hintze@...
Hi,
On 10 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On 11 Aug, GOTO Kentaro wrote:
Hi,
On 11 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
[#607] How to pass by `new' method of superclass? — clemens.hintze@...
[#626] Next misbehavior (sorry :-) — clemens.hintze@...
Hi,
[#634] ANN: testsupp.rb 0.1 — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
[#637] Backtrace of SIGSEGV — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
Hi,
On 12 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On 12 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
[#655] Your wish is fulfilled (erhm, almost ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi Gotoken,
[#667] How do I use `callcc' — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
[#668] Way to intercept method calls? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
[#679] Documentation about RD? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
=begin
On 18 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
On 18 Aug, GOTO Kentaro wrote:
Hi,
On 19 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
On 19 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On 19 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi
Hi,
Hi,
Hi Tosh and all,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On 19 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On 20 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
On 21 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
On 21 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On 24 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
I thought people might be interested in this. Here's how I am plugging
On 31 Aug, Jonathan Aseltine wrote:
[#737] RD with multi charset — Minero Aoki <aamine@...>
Hi, I'm Minero Aoki. This is my first mail in this mailling list.
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On 28 Aug, Minero Aoki wrote:
Hi,
[ruby-talk:00707] Re: Summary of discussion about RD (Re: Docum enta tion about RD?)
On 19 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote: > Hi, > [...] >> Furthermore I think that references like (2) are other beasts as used >> in (1) and (2). >> >> Opinions? > > Well... I suppose "((<...>))" has too much feature in gotoken's idea. > It is good idea that we use different brace for reference to Element of Doc > and resource of Internet. > And do we need reference to bibliography?? I don't think so... Perhaps we wouldn岐 need it. But I have no special wishes here. :-) [...] > Oh.... > I assumed that your proposal include to require ANY formatter of RD to > have a feature like "-use" and "-notuse" of [ruby-talk:687]. But it is > my misunderstanding. I understand that we use "=begin <something>" for > multiline comment and proper extension of RD formatters in your porposal. > I suppose it is nice.:-) > Do that mean, you like it? :-) [...] >> >> What `rd2xxx' doesn't know, should be ignored. So we are free for >> extension not coming from the `rdtool' direction. >> >> Opinions? > > Sorry, my explanation wasn't enough. > In Goto's proposal, we should write "<something>" not only after "=begin" > but also after "=end" to make sure and to show that text between > "=begin <something>" and "=end <something>" is NOT RD. > This is proposal not for semantics but for grammar. I don't think, we should have to use that `=end <something>' construct. `=begin <something>' should be enough, IMHO. If `=begin <something>' would be enough, anybody could write `=end <something>' if he like it. Because the whole `=end' line should ignored in any case! I would find it very... hmm... strange, if the following would be translated by rdtool... =begin ignoreit This section should be ignored because the =begin and =end line will have the same text behind it? =end ignorit See the mispelling for `ignor(e)it'? So I think, my proposal would be simpler and easier to handle. :-) Hmm! To clean-up my proposal, I wish to sum it up, ok? Please consider the following excerpt: =begin This is a section that should be considered by ((rdtool)). =end =begin blarb whereas that would one, that should be ignored; doesn't matter how the last line ends. =end =begin ァ$)(/$)/ This section should also be ignored! =end lkrelrjlwelrtkltn =begin . Like that last section too (Have you seen the dot after the =begin? ;-) =end . Any understandings removed? ;-))) > > --- > Tosh \cle