[#539] A new discussion topic ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi all,
[#546] Question concerning modules (1) — clemens.hintze@...
[#548] Bug: concerning Modules! — clemens.hintze@...
[#564] Ruby 1.3.7 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Ruby 1.3.7 is out, check out:
[#567] New feature request! :-) — clemens.hintze@...
On 6 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On 6 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#590] Bug in Array#clone! — clemens.hintze@...
Hi,
Hi,
[#600] A `File' is not a `IO'????? — clemens.hintze@...
Hi,
On 10 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On 11 Aug, GOTO Kentaro wrote:
Hi,
On 11 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
[#607] How to pass by `new' method of superclass? — clemens.hintze@...
[#626] Next misbehavior (sorry :-) — clemens.hintze@...
Hi,
[#634] ANN: testsupp.rb 0.1 — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
[#637] Backtrace of SIGSEGV — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
Hi,
On 12 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On 12 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
[#655] Your wish is fulfilled (erhm, almost ;-) — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi Gotoken,
[#667] How do I use `callcc' — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
[#668] Way to intercept method calls? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
[#679] Documentation about RD? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
=begin
On 18 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
On 18 Aug, GOTO Kentaro wrote:
Hi,
On 19 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
On 19 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On 19 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi
Hi,
Hi,
Hi Tosh and all,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On 19 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On 20 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
On 21 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
On 21 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On 24 Aug, Toshiro Kuwabara wrote:
Hi,
I thought people might be interested in this. Here's how I am plugging
On 31 Aug, Jonathan Aseltine wrote:
[#737] RD with multi charset — Minero Aoki <aamine@...>
Hi, I'm Minero Aoki. This is my first mail in this mailling list.
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On 28 Aug, Minero Aoki wrote:
Hi,
[ruby-talk:00586] Re: lisence (Re: Re: New feature request! :- ))
On 7 Aug, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote: > Hi, > > In message "[ruby-talk:00580] Re: lisence (Re: Re: New feature request! :-))" > on 99/08/06, clemens.hintze@alcatel.de <clemens.hintze@alcatel.de> writes: > [...] > |Which source? My extension? Ruby? regex.[ch]? > > Ruby, including regex.[ch], but not necessarily your code. > That's fine. With that I can live, I think! :-)))))) [...] > | > |But it let look the source ugly sometimes! I find it very nice to write: > | > | $copyright = "This software blah blah blah blah blah blah"\ > | "blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah"\ > | "blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah"\ > | "blah blah blah blah blah blah..." > > Hmm, I prefer > > $copyright = <<EOS > This software blah blah blah blah blah blah > blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah > blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah > blah blah blah blah blah blah... > EOS But that is not the same! :-)))))))))) Your string would have some whitespaces in front of every new line, wouldn't it? Except, of course, you would not indent the lines. But that makes ugly clusters in your normally perfectly indented code :-( > > But I can't force you to feel like me. I cannot believe that you think large portions of dedented text blocks are pretty! Perhaps they don't bother you.... but pretty? :-) > > |> Only if I find the way; it's too early to appreciate. ;-) > | > |Ey! "Only if I find a way; ..."???? You are the creator of Ruby! :-) > > OK, I mean 'Only if I find a BEST way'. > I'm not sure yet Python way is the best way. Okay! ;-) > > matz. \cle